Your Leadership Style Will Shape Your Organizational Culture


Organizational culture is the collection of values, beliefs, and attitudes that shape the way a firm operates, that is, how its people think, feel, and act (Gutterman, 2025). Organizational culture can evolve, but it is not accidental. It is shaped and sustained by its leadership (Jaiyeola et al., 2025). The way leaders of an organization make decisions, communicate, lead, assign priorities, and personally act sends signals to everyone in the organization about the way things are done. Whether intended or not, leadership actions influence employee morale and commitment, creativity and innovation, customer service, productivity, profitability, and the organization’s long-term survival (Khassawneh et al., 2022). To appreciate the influence of leadership on organizational culture, we need to examine how leaders communicate ways things should be done, model and reinforce the way. That is the focus of this article.

Leadership Influences Organizational Culture

The Leader as the Cultural Architect

Culture ultimately starts with the leader. The way things are done is mostly influenced by how leaders act and communicate. In times of uncertainty, employees look at their leaders to understand how things should be done. Leaders set the organization’s culture by establishing priorities and defining its mission. For instance, if a leader consistently directs that candid communication is a priority and consistently makes decisions openly and truthfully, a culture which values candid communication will be promoted. If a leader consistently makes decisions hierarchically and does not communicate frankly, the culture that emerges is that the way to get things done is through hierarchy and secrecy. The creation of culture begins with a leader’s intent. Leaders who intentionally establish cultural goals through establishing mission statements, visioning, setting goals, and behavioral expectations establish a culture that employees can understand and adapt to. Leaders who do not establish priorities create a culture that is confusing, fragmented, or conflicted because employees are left to their own devices to determine the priorities.

Modeling the Way

Perhaps the most important way leaders influence culture is through their actions. Employees focus more on how leaders act than on what they say. For example, if a leader talks about the significance of work-life balance but consistently works long hours, sends late-night emails and texts, or rewards people who do, a culture that supports burnout will be fostered. If a leader models empathy, active listening, and equity, those values will become part of the organization’s culture. Leaders’ actions have been referred to as the shadow of the leader (Judge, 1999) (Hudson, 2021). The shadow of the leader means that leaders throw a long influence over the organization through their actions (Judge, 1999). The way a leader reacts to a crisis, responds to success, handles failure, and gives feedback all impact how employees do their work. Leaders who model accountability establish a culture of accountability. Leaders who model humility establish a culture of humility. Through their actions, leaders establish the way things are done.

How Communication Shapes Culture

The way leaders communicate is a powerful influence on an organization’s culture. Leaders who consistently communicate in a clear, respectful, and open way establish a climate of trust and respect. Employees are appreciated and informed, they trust the leader more, and they establish a culture that trusts others. Communicating clearly and consistently about expectations, changes, challenges, and successes helps employees understand the way things are done. Lack of communication or poor communication by a leader creates confusion, mistrust, conflict, and poor morale. For instance, in a human service organization where employees need to establish trusting relationships with clients to achieve results, leaders who do not communicate clearly and consistently establish a culture of mistrust and suspicion. Employees feel disconnected and unsupported. Communication does not involve only the message conveyed but also the manner and tone. For example, is the communication method participative or authoritative? Is the attitude encouraging and supportive, dictatorial or punitive? The way a leader communicates influences the way employees feel about themselves and their organization. It influences whether employees feel connected to the organization.

Decision-Making and Priorities as Cultural Drivers

What leaders value and prioritize greatly influences an organization’s culture. What a leader decides to reward or not establishes the priorities of an organization. For example, if a leader consistently rewards teamwork and joint effort but ignores individual contributions, a culture which values teamwork and joint effort will be established. If a leader consistently focuses on speed and output while ignoring the need for planning and process, a culture that favors speed and output over planning and process will be established. The way a leader makes decisions also influences the culture. For example, leaders who consistently make participative decisions establish a culture of participation and involvement. Employees feel empowered and valued. Leaders who consistently make autocratic decisions establish a culture of control and mistrust. Employees feel disconnected and unsupported.

People, Practices, and Cultural Support

People-related practices – such as hiring, promotion, reward, and recognition – influence an organization’s culture (Acheampong, 2025). Leaders who establish hiring practices that ensure people who share the organization’s values are hired create a culture that supports those values. Leaders who promote people not only based on what they know and can do, but also on how they do it, establish a culture that supports the values of the organization. Leaders who reward and recognize employees who consistently act in line with the organization’s values establish a culture that supports those values. For example, if an organization’s values are respect for clients, respect for each other, and teamwork, and a leader rewards employees who consistently demonstrate those values, a culture that supports them will be established. On the other hand, if a leader ignores poor behavior and rewards results no matter how they are achieved, a culture that ignores values will be established.

Emotional Intelligence and Its Cultural Effect

A leader’s emotional intelligence strongly influences an organization’s culture (Mishra et al., 2024). Leaders with high emotional intelligence foster cultures that promote psychological safety, trust, and equity. Employees feel safe to take risks, they feel trusted to make decisions, and they feel the organization is fair and just. Leaders with high emotional intelligence are aware of their own emotions and those of others and consistently act in ways that support the health of everyone. They establish a climate of trust and respect. For example, a leader who consistently provides timely, honest feedback establishes a climate of trust and respect. A leader who consistently reacts badly when an employee makes a mistake establishes a culture of mistrust and suspicion.

Leadership and Culture Change

Culture change is perhaps the most difficult thing leaders can do (Muls et al., 2015, pp. 633-638). Many leaders fail to change their organizations’ cultures because it is a long-term process that demands sustained effort and commitment. Many leaders lack the patience and persistence to see the process through. Furthermore, many leaders do not model the way, thereby failing to gain trust and confidence with employees. Leaders who consistently model the way establish a culture that trusts and has confidence in them. When such leaders establish a new way of doing things, employees are more likely to follow. Employees trust the process and the leader and consistently support it. When a leader consistently and persistently communicates a new vision and way of doing things and models that way, employees begin to see a different way and establish a new one. Employees begin to consistently support the new way because they trust and have confidence in the leader and the process. For example, when leaders consistently communicate the need for employees to support each other consistently and persistently to establish a new service, employees begin to see that the way to establish the new service is to support each other in the same way. Employees begin to establish a culture of teamwork and cooperation to establish a new service. When employees consistently support each other in establishing new services, a culture of cooperation and teamwork is fostered.

Leadership Style and Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity

A leader’s leadership style strongly affects whether an organization supports and promotes inclusion, diversity, and equity (Tsai, 2024). When a leader consistently models inclusion and honors diversity, a culture that supports inclusion, diversity, and equity is established. Employees feel included, valued, and supported to contribute. When a leader consistently ignores diversity, equity, and inclusion, a culture that does the same is established. Employees do not feel included, valued, or supported in contributing. For example, when a leader consistently makes sure that all employees’ voices are heard, values variety of thought and approach, and consistently challenges discrimination and inequity, a culture that supports inclusion, diversity, and equity is established. When a leader consistently ignores employees’ voices, variety of thoughts and approach, and discrimination and inequity, a culture that ignores inclusion, diversity, and equity is established.

Long-Term Corporate Impact of Leadership

The long-term impact of leadership on an organization’s success is perhaps the most important influence leaders have (Zakliki & Christodoulou, 1996, pp. 30-47). An organization’s success is long-term because it is consistently influenced by how things are done. The way things are done consistently influences whether an organization consistently establishes and supports a positive, productive, and performance-oriented culture. When leaders consistently establish and support a positive, productive, and performance-oriented culture, employees are consistently positive, productive, and performance-oriented. The culture consistently attracts and retains talented employees who consistently support a positive, productive, and performance-oriented culture. Employees consistently support innovation, risk-taking, inclusion, diversity, and equity. Employees consistently support and establish quality and distinction and consistently strive to improve and excel. Employees consistently feel positive about what they do and how they do it and consistently feel that what they do is important and makes a difference. Employees consistently feel that they matter and are valued, and that they can consistently contribute to the best of their ability.

Conclusion

In conclusion, leadership style strongly influences an organization’s culture. It influences the way employees consistently feel about what they do and how they do it. It influences whether the organization consistently achieves positive results and makes a difference in clients’ lives or consistently achieves negative results and does not. It influences whether the organization consistently flourishes and prospers or consistently does not. Leaders who consistently model the way and establish a positive, productive, and performance-oriented culture consistently achieve positive results and make a difference in the lives of clients. Leaders who consistently do not model the way and consistently do not establish a positive, productive, and performance-oriented culture consistently achieve negative results and do not make a difference in the lives of clients. Leaders either consistently flourish and prosper, or consistently do not, depending on how they consistently influence their organization’s culture.

Dr. Isaac Mawuko Adusu, DHA, MSNPM is a Policy Advocate, Assistant Vice President of Adult Services at Seven Hills Foundation, Rhode Island and an internationally recognized nonprofit leader in intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and behavioral health, specializing in workforce transformation, community-based care, and organizational innovation. He can be contacted at [email protected] or [email protected].

References

Acheampong, S. (2025). Effect of rewards and recognition on labor productivity in the private sector of the Ghanaian economy. A moderating effect of organizational values. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.905000466

Gutterman, A. S. (2025) Organizational culture: What it is and why it counts SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5519618

Hudson, D. (2021). Shadow of the leader – Impactful leadership. https://impactfulleadership.com/shadow-of-the-leader/

Jaiyeola, O. O., Blessing, K., Ayuba, M. S., Jaiyeola, A. A. & Roland, E. (2025). The impact of leadership on organizational culture and employee well-being. Advances in Social Sciences and Management 3(5). https://doi.org/10.63002/assm.305.1166

Judge, W. Q. (1999). The leader’s shadow. SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/the-leaders-shadow/book9291

Khassawneh, O., Mohammad, T. & Ben-Abdallah, R. (2022). The impact of leadership on boosting employee creativity: The role of knowledge sharing as a mediator. Adm. Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040175

Mishra, N., Singh, P. & Chaturvedi, S. (2024). Emotional intelligence in leadership: A cross-cultural analysis of employee engagement and retention. Journal of Informatics Education and Research 4(3). https://jier.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1773

Muls, A., Dougherty, L., Doyle, N., Shaw, C., Soanes, L. & Stevens, A. (2015). Influencing organizational culture: A leadership challenge. British Journal of Nursing 24(12), pp. 633-638. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2015.24.12.633

Tsai, C.-H. (2024). The relationship between leadership styles and organizational commitment: Exploring the mediating effect of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices. Global Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(6), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.37745/gjhrm.2013

Zakliki, M. & Christodoulou, C. (1996). The impact of CEO role behavior on firm performance. Journal of Management & Organization 2(2), pp. 30-47. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.1996.2.2.30



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link