Vivaldi browser’s tab stacks are a lovely solution that I want on Chrome and Safari


While most Chromium-based browsers treat tab management as an afterthought, Vivaldi takes a smarter approach. Its latest iOS update doubles down on one of its best ideas: two-level tab stacks. It’s not a new feature, but it’s one of the few that actually makes juggling dozens of tabs on a phone feel manageable.

A small but genuinely useful feature

Instead of hiding grouped tabs in a menu or forcing you to switch to a different page, Vivaldi keeps everything accessible, letting you switch between related tabs quickly and intuitively. The browser displays your main tabs in a row at the top and surfaces a second row underneath when you’re inside a stack.

For anyone who’s constantly bouncing between research, work, and random reading, this makes a huge difference. Imagine planning a trip while comparing flights, hotels, and reviews across multiple sites. Vivaldi’s implementation lets you easily group all those tabs and switch between them instantly without breaking your flow.

The solution also makes sense for power users who rely on their phones for work. Whether you’re cross-referencing sources, tracking multiple stories, or managing research-heavy tasks, being able to keep related tabs grouped and visible can save a surprising amount of time.

To use this feature, you can long-press the New Tab button and select the “New Tab Stack” option. The browser offers two styles of tab stacking, Two-level and Accordion, and you can switch between them by navigating to Settings > Tabs > Tab Stacking Style.

Chrome gets the job done, but it’s not as intuitive

Google Chrome on mobile does have tab groups, but they live inside its grid-style tab switcher. Once you group tabs, the group appears as a single tab in the main tab switcher and can easily get lost among all the other open tabs. Accessing them means opening the tab switcher and scrolling through the open tabs or jumping into the dedicated group view, which adds extra steps.

Google’s approach works, but it’s not seamless. Switching between tabs in a group isn’t seamless either. You have to tap the Tab button in the bottom bar to return to the group view and then select another tab, which adds up if you’re jumping back and forth frequently.

Safari prioritizes simplicity over convenience

Safari on iPhones goes in the opposite direction. Its tab groups are clean and simple, but they behave more like folders than active browsing spaces. Swiping on the bottom bar to quickly move from one tab group to another is quite intuitive, but the same can’t be said for switching between different tabs within a group.

You open a group, pick a tab, and then have to return to the tab switcher to choose another. There’s no quick way to move between tabs within a group. You have to tap the three-dot menu button and select All Tabs to go to the tab group grid view to pick a different tab every time.

There’s an obvious trade-off to Vivaldi’s approach

Vivaldi’s two-level tab stacks make switching between tabs more seamless, but this implementation has a downside. Showing stacked tabs in a second row takes up extra screen space, so you don’t see as much page content as you would with a single row.

Vivaldi’s accordion-style stacking reduces this by grouping tabs into a single line, but it’s not as fluid as the two-level view. However, since the second row only appears when you’re using a stack, it doesn’t permanently clutter the interface. If you regularly juggle between a lot of tabs, the added visibility feels like a fair trade-off for losing a little bit of screen space occasionally.

A more practical approach to tab management

Vivaldi’s implementation isn’t perfect, but it highlights how much room there is to improve tab management on mobile. Instead of hiding tab groups away, the browser makes them easier to work with.

That’s what makes it stand out. And it also makes it harder to ignore how limited tab management still feels on Chrome and Safari. I hope Google and Apple catch on and implement something similar in their respective browsers soon.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link