The Galaxy S26 Ultra is a stunner, but it’s two-year old sibling is still kicking it just fine for me


It’s been just over a month since Samsung unveiled the Galaxy S26 series. As someone who has followed and used Samsung phones for years, this launch felt…familiar. Not bad, just not particularly exciting either. Sure, the Galaxy S26 Ultra brings a few upgrades. The much-talked-about privacy display looks impressive, the battery has seen a slight bump, and the redesigned camera module is definitely easier on the eyes. But beyond these changes, there isn’t much that feels new. Meanwhile, my two-year-old Galaxy S24 Ultra is still holding up perfectly well. It does everything I need without any real compromises. And honestly, there are quite a few reasons why I don’t feel the urge to upgrade just yet.

Not much has changed in how it looks or feels

The Galaxy S24 Ultra just nails the basics. The slightly curved frame makes it ridiculously comfortable to hold, to the point where I keep picking it up without a second thought. It’s one of those phones that just feels right in your hand, and that matters more than most upgrades brands love to talk about. Now, yes, the Galaxy S26 Ultra is comfortable too, but it doesn’t quite have that same effortless grip. It’s good, just not as good, and that’s exactly why the S24 Ultra still wins me over. At the end of the day, if a phone isn’t a joy to hold, what are we even doing here?

In terms of design, there’s barely anything new to write home about. The S26 Ultra gets a pill-shaped camera island, which looks cleaner, sure, but that’s pretty much it. Even the display size difference is almost laughable at 0.1 inches. You’re not noticing that unless you’re trying very hard. And yes, the Privacy Display on the S26 Ultra is seriously good. I’d take it on my S24 Ultra in a heartbeat. But upgrading an entire phone just for that one shiny trick? That’s a big ask, and Samsung knows it.

The upgrade that refuses to show off

On paper, the Galaxy S26 Ultra is the clear upgrade. It gets the latest Qualcomm chip, more power, and better thermal management. But once you actually start using it, the difference isn’t as dramatic as you’d expect. I had both phones side by side, and for everyday stuff like multitasking, scrolling through Instagram, replying to texts, or watching Netflix, they felt almost identical. Everything was smooth, fast, and responsive. Neither phone even got warm, which made the “upgrade” feel a bit less exciting.

Even with heavier tasks like gaming or editing videos on CapCut, both handled things really well. If you push them for longer sessions, the S26 Ultra does a better job of managing heat, and that’s where the newer chip quietly shows its advantage. But for everything most people actually do daily, the Galaxy S24 Ultra is still more than enough. It’s fast, reliable, and just gets things done without making a fuss.

The ultra-wide gets ambitious

On paper, the camera story feels like a familiar sequel. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra doesn’t reinvent the wheel; it just sharpens one spoke. The ultra-wide gets a serious bump from the 12MP sensor on the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra to a 50MP shooter, and yes, that’s the kind of upgrade that sounds impressive. In practice, though, it’s a little more situational. Ultra-wide shots aren’t exactly an everyday habit for everyone, and in that context, the S24 Ultra holds its ground rather confidently. It’s reliable, consistent, and rarely leaves you wishing for more unless you’re actively looking for that extra detail.

Where the S26 Ultra does quietly pull ahead is in its color science. There’s a subtle but noticeable refinement in how it handles tones and contrast. Photos look a touch more balanced and polished, without trying too hard. It’s not a night-and-day transformation, but it’s the kind of difference you start appreciating the more you pay attention.

More of the same, and that’s the problem

To put things into perspective, the battery life on the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has been really impressive. On a recent trip, it went from a full charge in the morning to well past 1AM, and it still had enough juice left to keep going. For a two-year-old phone, that’s excellent. 

Now, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra technically walks in with the same 5,000mAh battery. So, there’s no dramatic leap here, or an extra cushion that suddenly changes how you use your phone. If anything, it just reinforces how well the S24 Ultra has aged. Which, oddly enough, makes the newer Ultra a harder sell. When your current phone is already going the distance without complaints, “more of the same” doesn’t quite feel like a reason to upgrade. It feels like a reminder that you don’t really need to.

Why fix what’s already winning?

There’s something about Samsung phones that settles into your life and then refuses to leave. Coming from years inside the Apple ecosystem, that shift is hard to ignore. The Android side, especially on a Samsung, feels more open, more fluid, and oddly in sync with how things actually get done. It’s the little things that add up — the way everything glides on that display, the comfort of holding it through long days, and features like Galaxy AI that feel useful. All of that makes the decision simple.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra might be newer, faster, and technically better in some ways, but it doesn’t quite offer a compelling reason to move on. The S24 Ultra still feels complete, still keeps up, and still fits right into everyday life without friction. For now, the upgrade can wait. Two years in, and it still doesn’t feel like it’s running out of steam anytime soon. With almost five years of updates still ahead, it’s now more about waiting for something that truly feels like one.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link