Strava was logging my home address without asking—here’s the open-source app I switched to


The running season is in full swing across the Northern Hemisphere. The mild spring weather right before the summer heat has brought a lot of runners back outside for the first time in months, or in my case, years. Unsurprisingly, fitness apps that track your workouts have risen in popularity as well. Strava, in particular, has taken social media by storm, with many people sharing their personal records on Instagram.

While everyone is busy logging their runs on Strava, I quickly realized that the app was logging and sharing far more data than I was comfortable with, which is why I’ve switched to a free, open-source alternative.

I didn’t mind Strava’s clutter until I started thinking about what my running data actually reveals

Running outdoors shouldn’t come at the cost of privacy

One of the biggest issues with Strava is how it handles privacy and data out of the box. The app is built around its social features, so when you create an account, your profile and activities are set to be visible to everyone by default. On top of that, it’s cluttered with a range of privacy options that can be confusing to navigate, with some requiring you to opt out manually, making it easy to accidentally share more than you intended.

A fresh account can have profile visibility, activity feeds, group activities, heatmaps, and other personal information set to public. The Flyby feature in particular made headlines a few years ago because it could map out strangers who crossed paths during workouts.

A more recent example is how starting a run at home is handled. The starting point isn’t hidden by default, so if you begin tracking your workout before leaving your house, anyone using the app can effectively infer where you live if you haven’t configured your privacy settings. You might think this could never happen to you, but it’s surprisingly easy to miss.

This kind of self-doxing becomes especially problematic if you’ve linked Strava to another app connected to your fitness tracker and have it set up to automatically start tracking workouts when it detects activity. This is how my friend ended up sharing the location of his house with everyone through his Samsung Galaxy Watch.

samsung galaxy watch8

Brand

Samsung

Operating System

Wear OS

Now thinner and more comfortable, the Galaxy Watch 8 adds new health-tracking features like sleep apnea detection and antioxidant readings. Just be mindful about privacy settings when connecting it to third-party apps like Strava!


Want another example? There have been several reported instances of military personnel accidentally exposing sensitive locations.

Another gripe I personally have with Strava is how the app feels to use. It’s messy, confusing, and cluttered, much like its privacy menus. It took me a while just to figure out where my runs were saved, because the app is filled with distractions that constantly push free users toward a premium subscription with repeated prompts to start a trial.

But I don’t want this article to just be me poking holes in Strava and how it handles personal data. I also want to talk about the much better, privacy-focused alternative I’ve found.

FitoTrack gives me everything Strava does, but without the baggage

All the same basic data, just stripped down

Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Credit: Joe Fedewa / How-To Geek

FitoTrack is an incredibly simple app, and I mean that in the best way possible. It’s a free, open-source, completely ad-free fitness tracker that covers all the basics while keeping your data private and offline.

There’s no account, no cloud, or anything like that. It doesn’t have any of Strava’s social features, but if we’re being honest, most of us only use Strava to generate nice-looking GPS routes and key activity stats to collect brownie points (or “aura,” as the youngsters call it) on Instagram.

With FitoTrack, you can achieve pretty much the same result, but the key difference is that your data is logged only on your phone. This also means you need to make frequent backups if you don’t want to lose your data, but it’s a worthwhile trade-off.

Using the app to track your runs is incredibly simple, and there are still a fair number of things you can configure about its behavior. One of the coolest features is the ability to start and stop workouts by scanning an NFC tag.

There’s also a voice announcement feature that gives you automatic auditory updates on a schedule, along with pace warnings if you’re going too slow or too fast. This makes it easy to keep track of your current performance without relying on wearables or having to interrupt your run to check your phone.

Another aspect where FitoTrack surprised me is just how much data it’s able to track. Despite its apparent simplicity, the app covers 99.9% of the nerdy running stats anyone could wish for. You’ve got all the basics like start and end time, duration, pace, average and top speed, estimated calories burned, split times, and more. The icing on the cake is the detailed and accurate GPS route powered by OpenStreetMap.

I’ve used the app to track my run today, and I’m honestly hard-pressed to find a single major flaw. It’s pretty much just like Strava without the social aspect and privacy concerns.

Self-hosting a fitness dashboard on my home server ties it all together

A unified view that’s under my control

Endurain running on a computer, showing fitness data. Credit: Ismar Hrnjicevic / How-To Geek

One of the coolest things I like about FitoTrack is just how easy it is to export my activity data as a GPX file. It didn’t take me long to figure out a way to take advantage of that, which ended up being a fitness dashboard I can self-host on my home server: Endurain.

Endurain’s mobile app is still a work in progress, but it works well with other fitness tracking apps. If you’ve used multiple fitness apps over the years and are concerned about losing your data, Endurain gives you an easy way to unify it all under one roof. This is how I was able to merge my new FitoTrack data with my old Strava runs.

The cool thing about Endurain is that it’s actually designed to serve as a self-hosted drop-in replacement for Strava. You can create profiles and share your activity publicly, but you have full control over who is allowed to connect to your home server. I keep my Endurain strictly on my LAN; in other words, it acts like a mini Strava server for just my household.


You don’t need Strava when there are plenty of privacy-focused alternatives

If you think FitoTrack looks and feels a bit outdated, or you notice it’s missing a feature you love about Strava, but you still want a privacy-first fitness tracking app, I’m happy to report that FitoTrack is far from the only option. Plenty of other privacy-oriented alternatives offer similar levels of functionality but promise to keep your information private, such as RunnerUp, Trackbook, and OpenTracks.


A woman after a run looking at her smartwatch with the Google Fit logo in the center.


Google Fit is shutting down, and you need to migrate to a new Health app—here’s how

The Fitbit app is becoming “Google Health.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Modern displays are amazing when it comes to detail, brightness, color, and all the ingredients that make for an impressive picture—except motion clarity.

CRT screens are still the king of motion clarity, but plasma flat-panel screens hold a respectable second place, and in many ways I still miss my old 720p 51-inch plasma TV and the crisp motion I gave up by switching to a 4K LCD.

Plasma solved motion the “right” way

Plasma displays didn’t just show an image—they flashed it.

While they operate on different principles, CRTs and plasma TVs have a few things in common. First, the phosphors used by CRTs and plasma displays are the same. Second, because these phosphors fade quickly, they need to be continuously refreshed.

In a CRT, the electron beam scanning from the top to the bottom of the screen achieves this, and in a plasma, a high-speed electric pulse does the same. Because of this rapid pulse-and-fade, these screen technologies have crisp perceptual motion, since our brains tend to interpret moving images that don’t pulse as “smearing” across our retinas.

The pulsing nature of plasma technology isn’t the only reason for its better motion reproduction. These screens also have very low latency and very fast pixel response times. Combined, it’s not quite as good as CRT motion handling, but it’s significantly better than LCD and OLED technology, even today.

Modern TVs rely on sample-and-hold—and that’s the problem

Stand and deliver blurry images

Blur Busters UFO Test

Modern LCD and OLED televisions are “sample and hold” technologies. They can hold each frame of video perfectly for the entire duration of that frame without deviating in brightness and then instantly snap to the next frame without any dipping to black in-between.

On paper, this sounds like a good thing, but your eyes don’t stay still when tracking motion. As they follow a moving object, the image being held on screen effectively drags across your retina, creating the perception of blur. Even if the panel itself is perfectly sharp.

You might not even realize how blurry motion is on modern displays if all you’ve ever seen with the naked eye is an LCD or plasma. However, if you see a CRT or plasma in person, the difference is quite striking.

The sample and hold issue means that no matter how much you increase the refresh rate, that type of blur persists. It’s why my 85Hz CRT monitor is clearly less blurry in motion than my 240Hz LCD monitor. It’s especially apparent when you’re playing 2D games that scroll the entire screen, with LCDs or OLEDs smearing the image in a way that gives me a bit of a headache if I’m being honest.

Playing Diablo 2 on a CRT. Credit: Sydney Louw Butler/Shutterstock.com

It creates this weird situation where a modern TV can be incredibly sharp in a freeze frame but somehow look softer than a lower-resolution display that isn’t sample and hold as soon as you press play.

Motion interpolation is a workaround, not a solution

It’s an abomination, that’s what it is

One of the “fixes” that TV makers came up with to reduce unwanted motion blur is a technology known as frame interpolation, or more commonly “motion smoothing.” Here an algorithm creates fake frames that guess at what the middle step of motion would look like if it were captured. This creates a high frame-rate video output, which we see as smoother and more crisp.

While this doesn’t take away sample-and-hold blur, it does improve motion clarity. Unfortunately, it also destroys the intended frame rate that shows and movies were meant to be seen at. It’s also useless for video games, because it introduces an enormous amount of input lag. NVIDIA’s DLSS technology is also frame interpolation, but it works for games because of several mitigations NVIDIA put into the technology. These measures don’t exist on TVs.

While some people think motion smoothing isn’t all bad, TV makers are no longer activating it by default as much anymore, and my advice is to always turn it off because the trade-offs are just not worth it.

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 9.21.03 AM

7/10

Brand

TCL

Display Size

85-inches

The 2025 model TCL QM6K Google TV delivers a stunningly clear and bright picture with a new Mini-LED panel, improved local dimming zones, Dolby Vision IQ, and a neat new Halo Control system for improved visuals. Get this TV and elevate your living room. 


Black frame insertion tries to recreate plasma—but comes with trade-offs

Who turned out the lights?

The other trick sample-and-hold screens have to mimic what CRTs and plasma TVs do naturally is called BFI, or Black Frame Insertion. As the name suggests, the display inserts a full black frame between every original frame. This provides an instant and dramatic increase in motion clarity. However, it also has a big impact on brightness. As much as half of the light is now gone, so the image is much dimmer. Pushing overall brightness to compensate makes things hotter and more energy-hungry.

Some BFI implementations cause visible flicker, for which I personally have no tolerance at all, but the biggest problem here is that BFI doesn’t have the smooth pulsing roll off of the phosphors used in CRTs and plasma.


The future might circle back—but we’re not there yet

That might be changing, however, because a new generation of LCDs can leverage the power of multi-zone backlight technology to strobe the backlight across the screen in a way that mimics a CRT scanline.

NVIDIA’s G-SYNC Pulsar has received rave reviews from the biggest motion blur haters, and I sincerely hope that a similar technology becomes standard in TVs going ahead, so we can go back to enjoying the crisp motion we used to have without all the compromises.



Source link