South Korea is in talks with Samsung and SK Hynix over a second chip cluster


A presidential adviser says AI demand could pull forward the next phase of fab construction by more than a decade, and that the country needs somewhere to put it.

South Korea’s government is in talks with Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix about the next phase of large-scale investment in chip manufacturing, a presidential adviser said on Wednesday, adding that an announcement on a new chip cluster would follow soon.

The remarks, from presidential policy adviser Kim Yong-beom, framed the conversation less as a negotiation than as a logistics problem the country has not yet solved.

The pressure, Kim told a discussion panel, comes from demand. “Exponential and explosive” growth in orders driven by the AI industry could require the two companies to speed up construction of new facilities by more than 10 years, bringing forward to 2034 or 2035 capacity that had been planned for later. The schedule is being rewritten by how fast the chips are selling.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

That creates a question Kim was candid about. “Looking ahead to the next stage after seven or eight years, we are faced with the challenge of finding a massive new site for a second cluster,” he said.

The first cluster, the dense concentration of fabrication plants south of Seoul, is the spine of Korean memory production. A second one of comparable scale needs land, power, and water on a scale that does not assemble itself quickly.

Beyond the timeline and the search for a site, the specifics remain thin. Kim did not attach a won or dollar figure to the discussions, and the talks were described as ongoing rather than concluded.

Korean outlets have reported that Samsung and SK Hynix are weighing major investments in the country’s south-western region, with figures potentially running into the hundreds of trillions of won, though those reports go further than the presidential office has confirmed and should be read as expectation rather than commitment.

The political backdrop is President Lee Jae-myung’s emphasis on balanced regional development, which has made the location of new industrial investment a matter of national policy rather than corporate preference.

Steering a second chip cluster toward a region outside the existing Seoul-area corridor would serve that goal, which is part of why the government is in the room at all.

The numbers underneath the conversation explain its urgency. Korea is on course for double-digit nominal growth for the first time in more than two decades, a pace driven almost entirely by the soaring profits of its chipmakers.

The boom is narrow, concentrated in two companies, and the same officials now discussing where to build the next fabs have spent recent weeks worrying aloud about where the proceeds end up.

Kim himself warned this month that the chip windfall risks pooling in real estate rather than wages or productive investment, and floated a “normalisation of property taxation” in response.

The distributional question has already turned combustible once. Samsung’s largest union came within days of an extended walkout this year before a government-mediated pay deal, and the wider debate over who captures the AI windfall has become, in Seoul’s framing, a matter of national policy.

The same chip surge that is pulling forward fab construction is pulling forward those arguments too.

For the companies, the appeal of building with the state alongside them is straightforward.

New fabs are among the most capital-intensive projects in industry, and government support on land, permitting, and infrastructure shortens the runway.

Demand for the high-bandwidth memory that feeds AI accelerators has lifted both firms, with SK Hynix riding the HBM cycle hardest, and neither will want to be short of capacity when the next wave of orders lands.

What was announced on Wednesday, in the end, was that an announcement is coming. The shape of the second cluster, its location, its cost, and how the bill is split between the companies and the state, are the things still to be settled.

For now, Seoul has confirmed the talks are happening and the clock is running faster than the plans were drawn for.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


I am a recent convert to physical media — yet even as someone getting back into buying discs in 2026, I haven’t been buying Blu-rays. Like many Americans, I still pick up DVDs instead. These aren’t great times for the Blu-ray format, and don’t expect a turnaround in 2026.

Fewer new releases make their way to Blu-ray

More media is now released exclusively for streaming

Blu-ray has been around for two decades, but it never managed to fully replace, or even overtake, the DVD format it was designed to supersede. We still can’t take for granted that our favorite movies, let alone TV shows, will eventually see a Blu-ray release.

The movies most likely to come to Blu-ray are the ones that hit theaters, but a growing amount of cinema is designed exclusively with streaming platforms in mind. I recently rewatched Mississippi Masala, which led me to check in on what work Sarita Choudhury has done over the decades since. A film called Evil Eye released in 2020 caught my eye. Unfortunately, it’s only available via Prime Video. There’s no Blu-ray or even a DVD. In contrast, it’s easy to watch Michael B. Jordan in Sinners on Blu-ray, since that movie came to theaters last year.

You could say that it makes sense that a movie with a 4.8/10 rating on IMDb doesn’t see a physical release, but in the heyday of physical video, store shelves were stacked not only with just the big-budget bangers but plenty of straight-to-DVD movies as well. Now those films exist to pad out streaming catalogs instead.

Fewer big box stores stock their shelves with physical discs

Blu-ray discs have disappeared from some stores entirely

Best Buy store front
Best Buy

The format’s demise is striking. I frequent my local Best Buy quite often and don’t see any movies on display. That’s because the retailer stopped selling movies in stores several years ago. Walmart still sells them, but the selection is a fraction of what you could find ten or twenty years ago. The audience has been reduced down to the shrinking number of people whose internet at home can’t handle streaming and those who might think of themselves as collectors.

If you venture onto Reddit and visit r/Blu-ray, you will find more threads about thrift store hauls and older collections than excitement over the latest new release. Don’t get me wrong — I, too, am very excited about seeing what gems I can snag for only a couple bucks, but this shows the challenge retailers face. Increasingly, only enthusiasts are prepared to drop over $20 on a disc.

I’m not buying discs to stick them in a player

Phone on a stand playing a Netflix video Credit: Bertel King / How-To Geek

The simple truth is that most people don’t want to buy physical media. Discs don’t fit in phones, and the drives are no longer available in most laptops. Even desktop PCs lack a place to put a disk. I recently built a PC for the first time in part to digitize my media library, and I rely on an external DVD drive connected via USB. Yes, DVD, not Blu-ray. A smaller file size combined with upscaling is easier on my hard drive.

Retro nostalgia hasn’t helped Blu-ray in the same way it has aided vinyl. This is in part because most people simply don’t care all that much about video quality. Most are streaming video on Netflix and YouTube at middling settings on small screens, and many of us are acclimated to mid-range phone speakers, compared to which even the subpar built-in speakers on modern TVs sound like a huge step-up. It’s hard to convince large numbers of people to purchase an expensive version of a movie in a format that requires thousands of dollars of home media equipment to truly appreciate.

4K Ultra HD is in an even worse position

It’s been a decade, yet few people own these discs

The 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray format is an enhancement, rather than a replacement, of the Blu-ray discs that first appeared in 2006. Debuting in 2016, the 4K Ultra HD format supports the max resolution of a 4K TV.

4K TVs were still somewhat of a novelty ten years ago, but they’re cheap and commonplace today. Still, people aren’t demanding 4K-quality Blu-ray movies as a result. These discs are still less common than 1080p ones, which are themselves still outnumbered by DVDs.

This isn’t merely a matter of consumers preferring the cheaper option. Often, 4K simply isn’t a choice, or it’s one that arrives significantly later, like the Switch port of a PC title. Some recent films, like Exit 8, are slated to see a physical release over the summer yet will still be in 1080p when they do. Adoption of the newest format has been that slow.

The industry isn’t helping itself, either. 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray discs come with DRM and aren’t easy to play on a modern PC, further limiting potential growth. They do not want anyone pirating these super high-quality versions. When you consider that some of these 4K Blu-rays have an AI upscaling problem, you’re paying more for what may not even be the best version.​​​​​​​


Blu-ray is seeing fewer releases, is available in fewer places, and is less accessible in the ways many of us want to watch TV shows and movies in 2026. With our portable devices getting better and internet speeds getting faster, it’s hard to see physical video staging a turnaround, even if we’re still a long way off from it going away entirely.



Source link