More storage won’t fix your data problem—I learned this the hard way after 20TB of mistakes


Do you remember when storage used to be cheap? It’s a little hard to do that right now given that every type of computer component seems to be undergoing price surges from unending data center demands, but ten years ago I was on a storage buying spree that lasted a few years.

Today, I’m sitting on over 20TB of data spread around multiple computers, external drives, and, of course, “the cloud” and if I had known everything back then that I do today, I would probably have gone about things differently.

More storage never fixes bad storage habits

There aren’t enough drives on the planet

There is never such a thing as “enough” storage. My experience of this goes far beyond just the last ten years. It’s just human nature, I suppose, but I naturally think of empty storage space as a waste of room that I paid for. Inevitably I fill all the hard drives I have with software or data files, and then instead of putting some of it in cold storage or deleting it, I just buy more storage.

This is obviously unsustainable, but I started off on a 40MB hard drive in the early ’90s and I currently have 3.5TB of storage on my Windows computer that’s almost always full.

Windows storage icons showing five large drives that are mostly full.

It’s not all my own fault, of course. The actual size of the data has increased exponentially! Either way, just adding more storage just kicks the can down the road. You aren’t dealing with the data in any way, you’re just buying an additional landfill for more of it.

Seagate Expansion 6TB External Hard Drive HDD.

Storage Capacity

6TB

Brand

Seagate

The Seagate Expansion 6TB external hard drive is an excellent starting point if you are building a laptop NAS, offering plenty of capacity for backups and media. It is affordable, easy to set up, and fast enough over USB 3.0 for most home server use cases.


If your data exists in only one place, it’s already at risk

3-2-1: it’s a countdown to destruction

A Seagate external desktop hard drive enclosure. Credit: Ismar Hrnjicevic / How-To Geek

The exception to the “more storage” rule is making redundant copies of things that are actually important. There’s a reason the 3-2-1 backup rule is the gold-standard strategy. That’s the one where you need to keep three copies, in at least two formats, with one off-site copy.

For me, cloud storage has become my off-site backup, but an old cold-storage HDD you keep at your mom’s house is just as valid. I just like that cloud providers also follow some version of this rule with my data, so it’s exponentially safer this way.

The downside is that cloud storage is expensive and an ongoing cost, so I only use it for truly irreplaceable information. Unfortunately, it also comes with privacy concerns, and some of my most important documents are very private indeed. So I have learned to encrypt them individually before uploading to the cloud. This means the cloud provider can’t read the contents, but that’s the point!

SSDs and hard drives are both still essential

Complementary, not mutually exclusive

There was definitely a time when the general sentiment seemed to be in favor of SSD technology being a total replacement for “spinning rust” hard drives. I started my own SSD journey just over ten years ago, and that first SSD of mine is actually still going strong. It’s a 500GB Samsung drive that I’ve overwritten completely 280 times in a decade, and it’s still in perfect health. In fact, all but one of my SSDs have failed, so my level of trust in this technology is quite high.

And yet I won’t quite trust it for long-term storage. SSD bit rot is a real issue where flash memory loses its contents if you don’t plug it in for a very long time. We’re talking many years at room temperature, but I’d still rather trust my data to an archival hard drive.

I tend to keep data on SSDs that I can replace from other sources, and mainly benefit from speed. So it’s mostly software installed on them. Besides, SSDs are still so much more expensive per gigabyte than hard drives, despite prices going down across the board. Hard drive makers have just managed to cram more and more storage into the same HDD form factor. They’ve become faster too. Dual-actuator designs mean that high-end modern hard drives can even keep up with SATA SSDs when it comes to sequential data transfers.

The way I feel now, I think mechanical hard drives will be with us for the foreseeable future, it’s just their role that’s changed somewhat.

The biggest threat to your files is usually you

Mea culpa

A disintegrating mechanical hard drive. Credit: Daniel Krason / Shutterstock

I’m enough of a grownup to admit that almost every time I’ve lost irreplaceable data in the last ten years, it was because I was a doofus. It wasn’t drive failure, or a virus, or ransomware that got me. It was my habit of using the Shift-Delete shortcut in Windows (which skips the recycle bin) or a poorly-considered terminal command in Linux that torched my bits.

I once destroyed a terabyte of video footage trying to convert an NTFS drive to APFS so my Mac could read and write to the drive. I foolishly believed a utility that claimed it could do this in-line without having to move the data to another drive first. Lesson learned, I guess.


Not everything deserves to be archived forever

The biggest lesson is also the hardest for someone with hoarding tendencies like me. I have the idea that maybe I’ll need a document again one day, or that I need ten photos of almost exactly the same thing. I still have documents I created in previous jobs for people who are no longer even alive.

So I’ve started using time as a filter. If I’ve had something stored for longer than five years, I need to decide if it’s worth keeping or not. If I haven’t needed it in five years and it’s not sentimental or critical (like a copy of my birth certificate) then I should let it go, and so should you.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Pixar is the champion of animation, but not all of their movies have had the chance to shine. For 40 years, the studio has brought families together across 30 movies. Certain movies never enter the discussion of being among the studios’ best — they were overshadowed by other films, or they went direct-to-streaming on Disney+.

In honor of the 40th anniversary, here are four Pixar movies that are worth reevaluating in 2026.

Toy Story 4

A surprisingly strong sequel

In 2010, Toy Story 3 brought Pixar’s debut franchise to an emotional close, as Woody (Tom Hanks), Buzz (Tim Allen), and the gang said farewell to Andy, preparing for a new life with Bonnie (Madeleine McGraw). After bringing their genre-defining animated trilogy to a fitting conclusion, I was doubtful that any follow-up could ever live up to the trilogy’s legacy. However, I was pleasantly surprised when I finally found the time to watch Toy Story 4.

As the gang of toys and Bonnie embark on a trip, Woody sets out to help the handcrafted toy Forky (Tony Hale) while also reuniting with Bo Peep (Annie Potts), who has become a rescuer of stray toys. As expected, Pixar’s animation remains ever-impressive, but Toy Story 4 manages to recapture the charm of the original 3 movies and offer a surprisingly fitting epilogue to Woody’s story in particular. Even with a new installment on the horizon, the emotion behind Toy Story 4‘s major status quo change for the gang ensures that the movie will be able to stand on its own merits for many years to come.

Turning Red

A stylistic reinvention

2022’s Turning Red saw Pixar take another crack at a coming-of-age story. The young Mei (Rosalie Chiang) clashes with her mother, Ming Lee (Sandra Oh), leading to her learning that she inherited the power to turn into a gigantic red panda in moments of heightened emotion. With her favorite boy band in town, Mei and her friends plan to use these gifts to attend the concert. As the concert draws nearer, however, Mei continues to clash with her mother, building to a generational showdown to heal her family’s curse.

Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K Max

Integrations

Alexa

Storage

16GB


When compared to what came before, Turning Red is a drastic stylistic departure from Pixar’s filmography. Mei’s story is told in a more informal manner when compared to other features, as Mei breaks the fourth wall and is incredibly expressive when compared to how past features tiptoed the line between cartoon and realism. However, this stylistic decision gives Turning Red a unique charm while making its story feel all the more personal and emotional, as we are given a clearer insight into Mei’s state than any other Pixar protagonist that has come before.​​​​​​​

Monsters University

Expanding a universe

While Toy Story had proven that Pixar could create successful sequels, expanding on a movie was still a rare move for the studio in the early 2010s, with said franchise and Cars being an exception. As such, Monsters University had a lot of pressure placed upon its shoulders when it released. Set several years before the events of Monsters Inc, the prequel explores how Mike (Billy Crystal) and Sully (John Goodman) went from fierce rivals to the firmest of friends during their time at the titular scaring school.

Blending the setting and cast of Monsters Inc. with a teen college movie was an ideal choice to expand the world of this Pixar movie, as most of the charm found in Monstropolis comes from how it drastically imagined elements of our own world in its monstrous lens. Furthermore, it is interesting to see that Sully and Mike began as rivals, and Mike’s arc focusing on his struggle to be a scarer does add layers to where his journey ends in the original movie. As such, Monsters University is a worthy prologue to one of Pixar’s most enduring franchises.​​​​​​​

Soul

A deeper tale with age

Pixar is unafraid to tackle deeper and more mature subjects. However, I feel Soul stands as one of their most ambitious explorations yet. On the verge of fulfilling his dream, Joe (Jamie Foxx) is caught in a near-death experience, leading to him becoming a disembodied soul in the “Great Before.” When his soul is tasked to guide the reluctant 22 (Tina Fey) into finding the passion that will drive her during her time on Earth, Joe is taken on a journey to not only return to his body but also reconsider what drives him and what is important in life.

For a studio that has prided itself on packaging deeper themes into a family-friendly package, Soul easily stands as a movie that feels targeted for its older viewers. Children may be inspired to take joy in everything life can offer through 22’s journey, but Joe’s story is particularly relatable to those who have had to grapple with their passions being lost or an unpredictable turn in life putting a stop to a dream, and watching him regain that through his experiences with 22 is incredibly emotional. While it may not have had a chance to shine at the box office, Soul will stand as a fondly remembered Pixar classic. Hopefully, new viewers and young fans can begin to see the movie through different perspectives as they face their own trials.​​​​​​​


Subscription with ads

Yes, the Disney Basic plan

Simultaneous streams

Up to 4

Live TV

No

Price

Starting at $10/month

Family favorites, old classics, and exciting new TV all in one place.




Source link