One of the most user-friendly Linux distros I’ve ever used is also one of the most secure


Aurora Linux

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Aurora Linux is an immutable Linux distro that anyone can use.
  • This distro ships with GPU drivers, sensible defaults, and high security.
  • You can download and install Aurora for free.

There are several reasons why you should consider an immutable Linux distribution. For one, immutability makes Linux incredibly secure because it mounts several key directories as read-only. By doing this, those directories cannot be altered, so they’re far more secure.

Although that sounds like a recipe for complexity, you might be surprised to know that such distributions can be just as user-friendly as immutable ones. You can still install and use any app you need (thanks to Flatpak), and those apps work exactly as expected. Performance is not hampered, and stability is as solid as ever.

Also: 6 most Windows-like Linux distros because old habits die hard

Case in point: Aurora is a new immutable Linux distribution based on Fedora Silverblue using the KDE Plasma desktop. But wait, doesn’t that sound like Fedora Kinoite? For those who don’t know, Fedora Kinoite is the KDE Plasma take on Fedora Silverblue, so it’s easy to mistake the two. However, Aurora is not Kinoite, and it sets itself apart in a few important ways.

Aurora vs. Kinoite

First off, Aurora ships with the necessary GPU drivers for all graphics cards and CPUs, including GPUs from Nvidia and AMD. That expanded hardware support also extends to game controllers and printer drivers, so chances are good that your hardware will work with this distribution.

Then, there’s the unified app store, Bazaar, where developers can easily publish their apps and users can download and install them. From within Bazaar, you can enable/disable things like free software only, Flathub results only, verified results only, and hide end-of-life apps.

Aurora Linux

Customizing Bazaar is simple with Aurora.

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

Aurora also ships with sensible defaults. What does that mean? Out of the box, Aurora is all about immediate ease-of-use, as well as entertainment and productivity. Unlike some Linux distributions, the sensible defaults mean you don’t have to worry about changing or customizing anything before those things can be achieved. Although you might have to install some software (such as LibreOffice, Steam, Slack, or Spotify), the out-of-the-box experience is as easy as it gets.

With a set of carefully selected applications and chosen defaults, Aurora is built for daily usage and is easy, fun, and productive. It takes care of you and works alongside you.

Also: My 10 favorite Linux distributions of all time, ranked

At the same time, Aurora does hold some similarities to Kinoite, in that it is immutable and updates are done atomically, which means that if an update should fail, it is immediately rolled back, so you don’t have to worry about your machine ever failing because of an upgrade.

Of course, with the addition of GPU drivers, you can install and run local AI (such as Ollama) without worrying about performance. 

What makes Aurora so ideal?

Outside of the automatic GPU driver installation and the sensible defaults, I find Aurora to be an ideal immutable distribution for new Linux users because it uses KDE Plasma as its desktop environment, and although there are plenty of aspects that would appeal to developers (such as the inclusion of Distrobox), it’s very much an end-user operating system.

Also: The 6 best Linux distros for students – from elementary to college

Probably the best thing about Aurora Linux is that it is a set-it-and-forget-it distribution, which means you’ll install the OS and simply start using it. Although this can be said for other Linux distributions, when you combine it with the immutability and atomicity, Aurora becomes something rather special.

At the same time, security should be at the top of everyone’s mind. Given the rise in Linux kernel vulnerabilities, the added security that comes along with immutable distributions, Aurora should be considered at or near the top of distributions for new users. With that in mind, Aurora doesn’t require that the user do much to secure the OS. And unlike many Linux distributions, the Firewall is enabled by default, so you get even more security at a time when it is much-needed.

What could make Aurora even better?

I have very few nits to pick with this Linux distribution, but I do think it could benefit from the following:

  • A preinstalled office suite
  • Preinstalled Steam for gaming
  • OS upgrades rolled into the app store GUI
  • A GUI boot loader
  • Default to a light theme (most users aren’t accustomed to dark themes)

That’s all I can think of; otherwise, Aurora is a brilliant Linux distribution that anyone could jump into without even the slightest bit of trouble.

Also: Immutable Linux delivers serious security – here are your 5 best options

If I’ve piqued your interest in Aurora Linux, download an ISO for your system’s GPU, create a live USB device with it, boot it, see if you like it, and install it.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Modern displays are amazing when it comes to detail, brightness, color, and all the ingredients that make for an impressive picture—except motion clarity.

CRT screens are still the king of motion clarity, but plasma flat-panel screens hold a respectable second place, and in many ways I still miss my old 720p 51-inch plasma TV and the crisp motion I gave up by switching to a 4K LCD.

Plasma solved motion the “right” way

Plasma displays didn’t just show an image—they flashed it.

While they operate on different principles, CRTs and plasma TVs have a few things in common. First, the phosphors used by CRTs and plasma displays are the same. Second, because these phosphors fade quickly, they need to be continuously refreshed.

In a CRT, the electron beam scanning from the top to the bottom of the screen achieves this, and in a plasma, a high-speed electric pulse does the same. Because of this rapid pulse-and-fade, these screen technologies have crisp perceptual motion, since our brains tend to interpret moving images that don’t pulse as “smearing” across our retinas.

The pulsing nature of plasma technology isn’t the only reason for its better motion reproduction. These screens also have very low latency and very fast pixel response times. Combined, it’s not quite as good as CRT motion handling, but it’s significantly better than LCD and OLED technology, even today.

Modern TVs rely on sample-and-hold—and that’s the problem

Stand and deliver blurry images

Blur Busters UFO Test

Modern LCD and OLED televisions are “sample and hold” technologies. They can hold each frame of video perfectly for the entire duration of that frame without deviating in brightness and then instantly snap to the next frame without any dipping to black in-between.

On paper, this sounds like a good thing, but your eyes don’t stay still when tracking motion. As they follow a moving object, the image being held on screen effectively drags across your retina, creating the perception of blur. Even if the panel itself is perfectly sharp.

You might not even realize how blurry motion is on modern displays if all you’ve ever seen with the naked eye is an LCD or plasma. However, if you see a CRT or plasma in person, the difference is quite striking.

The sample and hold issue means that no matter how much you increase the refresh rate, that type of blur persists. It’s why my 85Hz CRT monitor is clearly less blurry in motion than my 240Hz LCD monitor. It’s especially apparent when you’re playing 2D games that scroll the entire screen, with LCDs or OLEDs smearing the image in a way that gives me a bit of a headache if I’m being honest.

Playing Diablo 2 on a CRT. Credit: Sydney Louw Butler/Shutterstock.com

It creates this weird situation where a modern TV can be incredibly sharp in a freeze frame but somehow look softer than a lower-resolution display that isn’t sample and hold as soon as you press play.

Motion interpolation is a workaround, not a solution

It’s an abomination, that’s what it is

One of the “fixes” that TV makers came up with to reduce unwanted motion blur is a technology known as frame interpolation, or more commonly “motion smoothing.” Here an algorithm creates fake frames that guess at what the middle step of motion would look like if it were captured. This creates a high frame-rate video output, which we see as smoother and more crisp.

While this doesn’t take away sample-and-hold blur, it does improve motion clarity. Unfortunately, it also destroys the intended frame rate that shows and movies were meant to be seen at. It’s also useless for video games, because it introduces an enormous amount of input lag. NVIDIA’s DLSS technology is also frame interpolation, but it works for games because of several mitigations NVIDIA put into the technology. These measures don’t exist on TVs.

While some people think motion smoothing isn’t all bad, TV makers are no longer activating it by default as much anymore, and my advice is to always turn it off because the trade-offs are just not worth it.

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 9.21.03 AM

7/10

Brand

TCL

Display Size

85-inches

The 2025 model TCL QM6K Google TV delivers a stunningly clear and bright picture with a new Mini-LED panel, improved local dimming zones, Dolby Vision IQ, and a neat new Halo Control system for improved visuals. Get this TV and elevate your living room. 


Black frame insertion tries to recreate plasma—but comes with trade-offs

Who turned out the lights?

The other trick sample-and-hold screens have to mimic what CRTs and plasma TVs do naturally is called BFI, or Black Frame Insertion. As the name suggests, the display inserts a full black frame between every original frame. This provides an instant and dramatic increase in motion clarity. However, it also has a big impact on brightness. As much as half of the light is now gone, so the image is much dimmer. Pushing overall brightness to compensate makes things hotter and more energy-hungry.

Some BFI implementations cause visible flicker, for which I personally have no tolerance at all, but the biggest problem here is that BFI doesn’t have the smooth pulsing roll off of the phosphors used in CRTs and plasma.


The future might circle back—but we’re not there yet

That might be changing, however, because a new generation of LCDs can leverage the power of multi-zone backlight technology to strobe the backlight across the screen in a way that mimics a CRT scanline.

NVIDIA’s G-SYNC Pulsar has received rave reviews from the biggest motion blur haters, and I sincerely hope that a similar technology becomes standard in TVs going ahead, so we can go back to enjoying the crisp motion we used to have without all the compromises.



Source link