Internet’s favorite app Vine is back from the dead, and it’s called Divine


Vine is back, and if you’re already feeling nostalgic, you’re not alone. Divine, a Vine reboot backed by Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey, is now available on the App Store and Google Play. The app brings back roughly 500,000 archived Vine videos and lets creators post new six-second looping videos once again.

As reported by TechCrunch, Dorsey’s nonprofit, “and Other Stuff,” financed the project. He’s not looking for a return on his investment here. His goal is simpler: to undo the mistake he made when he shut down Vine back in 2017.

So, how did they bring Vine back?

Early Twitter employee Evan Henshaw-Plath, better known online as “Rabble,” led the effort. He discovered that much of Vine’s original content was backed up by a community archiving project called the Archive Team.

The files were stored as massive 40-50 GB binary files, requiring Rabble to write big-data scripts just to figure out how to reconstruct the videos along with their original views, likes, and comments.

The app first launched to testers last November with 100,000 videos, grew to 300,000 just before today’s launch, and now hosts videos from nearly 100,000 original Vine creators.

Is this just a nostalgia trip?

Not exactly. Original Viners actually pushed the team to slow down and get it right. “It was actually the Viners who were like ‘no, no, this is way more important than just nostalgia,’” Rabble explained.

One big selling point is Divine’s stance on AI-generated content. It simply doesn’t allow it. “I don’t like feeling tricked,” Rabble said. The app requires users to either record videos directly in the app or verify how the uploaded videos were created.

Several OG Viners are already on board, including Lele Pons, who said, “Many of us came from Vine, and it was the beginning of everything.”

Divine is free to download and is currently rolling out via invite codes. I just hope that it lasts longer than Digg did.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Apple’s Hide My Email feature has always been a pretty good quality-of-life privacy tool. iCloud+ subscribers can access randomly generated email addresses that forward messages to their real inbox. This helps users avoid any apps or websites from seeing their actual address. Apple also states that it doesn’t read the forwarded messages either.

All of this makes it quite a handy tool that genuinely cuts down on spam, creating a distance between you and whatever sketchy service wants your email.

But what it apparently does not do is hide your identity from law enforcement.

What’s going on?

According to court documents seen by TechCrunch, Apple provided federal agents with the real identities of at least two customers who had used Hide My Email addresses. One case in particular had the FBI seek records in an investigation that involved an email allegedly threatening Alexis Wilkins, who has been publicly reported as the girlfriend of FBI director Kash Patel.

The affidavit cited in the report states that Apple identified the anonymized address as being associated with the target Apple account. The company even provided the account holder’s full name and email address, along with records of another 134 anonymized email accounts created through this privacy feature.

TechCrunch also says it reviewed a second search warrant tied to an investigation by Homeland Security, where Apple again provided information linking Hide My Email accounts back to a user.

Why does this concern you

Before anyone starts calling out Apple for breaching privacy, they should know the distinction between companies and official warrants. Hide My Email is designed to protect users from apps, websites, and marketers, not from legal requests.

Apple still stores customer data like names, addresses, billing details, and other unencrypted info, which can be handed over when authorities come knocking with the right paperwork. So an email is a weak point here. Most emails are still not end-to-end encrypted, which means it is fundamentally different from services like Signal, whose popularity has grown precisely because of their robust privacy model.



Source link