I was skeptical of this inflatable solar-powered lantern, but it’s become a staple


img-1959.jpg

ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • The LuminAid solar camping lantern is available now for $25.
  • It’s the perfect lantern for emergencies with a very long runtime and chargeable with a solar panel or USB.
  • The lantern could blow away if not properly secured outdoors.

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


One mistake I see a lot of people make with their portable power stations is hooking up mains-powered lights, like a desk or floor lamp. Despite the fact that your lamp might make use of a low-energy LED lightbulb (and it should, because those old incandescent bulbs are terribly wasteful), using the AC outlet on a power station is wasteful if low-voltage options exist. 

This is why I recommend keeping emergency lighting like camping lanterns handy, both for use outdoors but also situations when you find yourself stuck in the darkness. 

Also: How my portable wind turbine compares to solar panels – 2 years of testing later

I also like my lights to be compact, lightweight, and designed to be stored until needed. If they can be solar-charged, then so much the better. One light that ticks all these boxes — and more — is the LuminAid PackLite Nova inflatable solar camping light

The LuminAID makes a number of different lights — from the Nova Multicolor color-changing light to the beefy Survivor which has a 600 lumen output and the ability to charge two smartphones. But it’s the PackLite Nova that ticks the boxes for me. 

It’s lightweight, at just five ounces, collapsible down to a package that’s just 4.75 x 4.75 x 1 inches, inflatable to 4.75 x 4.75 x 4.75 inches, water and dustproof to IP67 standards, and is happy to be dropped or kicked about. 

Packs small!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Yes, this lantern is inflatable, and there’s a little valve at the bottom that allows for inflation and deflation. This keeps it lightweight and adds to the robustness of the overall unit. I also like the fact that you can tuck an under-inflated PackLite Nova into a corner or the crook of a branch or under something to position it or stop it blowing away. 

Also: After testing this Anker, I wish every wireless charger had a thermoelectric cooler

On the top is a small solar panel that actually works (as opposed to the solar panels on top of a lot of gadgets such as power banks) and it can fully recharge the unit in about 10 hours. If that’s too long, you can opt for USB charging using a weatherproof port that takes about two hours. 

On a full charge, the PackLite Nova will run for around 18 to 24 hours on the lowest 12-lumen setting, and three to five hours on the 75-lumen setting. You could literally recharge this from a small power station hundreds of times over. 

LuminAID PackLite Nova inflatable solar camping light

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

On the top, there’s a handy carry handle that can also allow the lantern to be attached to a convenient branch or tent guyline. 

I like the gear that LuminAid makes, and I also like the company. It’s a small women-owned business that started out making low-cost lights that were sent to Haiti after a devastating earthquake in 2010. Since then the company has distributed more than 200,000 solar lights to disaster-hit families in Syria, Nepal, and Puerto Rico. 

Also: This USB-C accessory gave my iPhone and Android an unexpectedly useful superpower

ZDNET’s buying advice

The perfect lantern for adventures and emergencies.

LuminAID PackLite Nova inflatable solar camping light.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The LuminAid PackLite Nova inflatable solar camping light is a handy device I’ve taken with me on a lot of journeys, from overnight hikes to longer-distance treks, and I’ve used it to illuminate campsites, vehicles, tents, albergues, and even a few hammocks. 

I’ve owned a number of these lanterns over the years, and the ones that I still have (I’ve given quite a few away to people during power outages) are still going strong. I picked up this new one as part of my emergency kit upgrade last year, and it has come in handy a couple of times this winter. For a lantern you can pick up for under $25, that’s a darn good lifespan.  





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link