I tried self-hosting email and quickly remembered why people don’t


I self-host almost everything. I have a half-dozen Raspberry Pis, two PCs, and an old thin client running most of my digital life. The services range from a Pi-hole with Unbound, fully redundant VPNs, a file server, a Google Photo replacement, Joplin, and a dozen AI services.

I love self-hosting, in all that entails. However, a recent quick attempt at self-hosting email quickly reminded me why it is a really terrible thing to self-host.

Why self-host an email in the first place?

The temptation to self-host everything is inescapable

An iPhone with a message from Gmail stating that storage is almost full. Credit: Adam Davidson / How-To Geek

Email, like a phone number, is your gateway to the digital world. You use it to log into websites, get important notifications, and communicate personally and professionally.

Every time I consider it, a number of things occur to me that make me want to do it.

  • Nobody reads my mail — No provider scanning messages, no ad profiling built from my inbox, and no AI training.
  • No arbitrary limits — My storage and domains would be my own.
  • No monthly fee — No extra costs besides the server and the domain name.

Despite the appeal, self-hosting email is also a monumental task—probably the most difficult thing you can self-host. That itself makes it appealing in a way, a bit like climbing the self-hosting Everest.

Self-hosting email is a headache

Multiple things need to work together perfectly

Most self-hosted services are relatively simple to get up and running. They’re usually one, maybe two, services, and there are often all-in-one installer scripts that guide you through every important decision related to the service’s behavior. Email is a very different story.

When I started going through the process of self-hosting email again, I was quickly reminded that a big part of the difficulty was just how many components needed to work together to create a functioning email. There are:

  • The MTA — Handles the actual sending and receiving of mail over SMTP.
  • The IMAP server — Stores your mail and lets your phone and PC actually read it.
  • Spam filtering (like SpamAssassin) — Tries to keep the spam and nonsense out of your inbox.
  • The authenticator — Ensures it together so only you can send and email as you.

And then there are some other considerations. You need Sender Policy Framework (SPF) to prevent spoofing, DKIM to cryptographically sign your outgoing mail, and DMARC to handle exceptions.

If you make a mistake, it could completely break your email or partially break your email, and it may take a while for you to notice.

There are bundles like Mailcow, Mail-in-a-box, and Mailu that aim to streamline the process by packing everything together, but you still face the same fundamental problem: Reliable email requires a ton of parts working together flawlessly. Individual parts could fail while others work as they should, which can cause bugs you might miss at first.

And then, on top of that, you need physical hardware that is reliable with extremely robust backup measures, so you don’t lose any of your emails.

WD Red Pro

Storage Capacity

2 – 26TB

Workload

550TB/yr

Suitable for

NAS

Western Digital’s Red Pro NAS hard drives come in sizes from 2TB to 26TB.


Email is so easy to break

You might not even be at fault

A Dell PowerEdge R720 rack-mount enterprise-grade server. Credit: Patrick Campanale / How-To Geek

Unfortunately, even if you do everything correctly, you’re still vulnerable to outside forces that you have no control over.

Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo cover most of the world’s emails, and they’re famously leery of other email providers—especially if they originate from an unexpected IP address—and for good reason. Email is a popular vector for all sorts of cyberattacks.

That could mean you get blocked right out of the gate. Even if you do manage to successfully deliver emails, one bout of “unusual” behavior could lead to your IP getting blocked by Google or Microsoft. At that point, you’re stuck, unable to send emails, which almost completely defeats the purpose of self-hosting an email server.

If Navidrome crashes, I miss out on music; if email crashes I lose everything

Not only is email difficult to self-host, the stakes are quite high. If I lost access to my email, I’d lose the ability to log into dozens of services, recover passwords, and receive 2FA codes. It would be unbelievably annoying to work around.


Symfonium open on the head unit of a 2018 Kia Forte.


I built a self-hosted Navidrome server to replace Spotify, and it works better than I expected

$20 in parts and an hour can get you your own Spotify alternative.

Beyond simple inconvenience, there is also the problem of lost information. If your email server goes down, and you receive a message, SMTP will try and ensure you get it eventually. However, that doesn’t solve your immediate problem during an outage: You have no access to your email. And an outage might not even be your fault. A bout of freezing rain could knock out your home email server for hours or even days.


Email is just not worth the trouble

Self-hosting is a great hobby, and I’m constantly tempted to try self-hosting an email server just for the experience if nothing else. However, the difficulty combined with the risk ultimately makes it not worthwhile.

Running a reliable email server is a full-time job, and I’m going to leave it to the professionals.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


1,000W, 10-port charger for $45... predictably disappointing.

1,000W, 10-port charger for $45… predictably disappointing. 

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Things that look “too good to be true” invariable are just that.
  • This example got dangerously hot in a short period of time before dying. 
  • There’s no legitimate charger that comes close to delivering on the 1,000W promise.

Being a tech reviewer for a living means that I get offered some very interesting things. Not interesting as in Bugatti supercars or jewel-encrusted Fabergé eggs, but interesting as in “this thing could easily be a fire hazard — want to take a look?”

Also: The best GaN chargers of 2026: Expert tested

Submissively, I often say yes. And I’m glad I did with the most recent pitch, because it was very interesting indeed.

Meet the “interesting” charger

This time around, the thing of interest was a charger that claimed to deliver an incredible 1,000W through its ten ports — four 140W USB-C ports, four 100W USB-C ports, and two 20W USB-A ports. 

The person who bought this charger told me that they’d plugged it in, used it to charge their phone for “a few minutes,” got worried when it became “a little hot,” and unplugged it.

That's a lot of promise... but (spoilers), they don't deliver!

That’s a lot of promise… but (spoilers), they don’t deliver!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The unit was suspiciously light and plasticky, especially given its built-in power supply. Compare this to Ugreen’s Nexode 500W charger, which weighs a hair under 5 lb.

There was also a slight whiff of melty plastic, which made me think that this had been a bit more than a little hot. 

Also: This $4 router reboot timer is the cheap internet fix I didn’t know I needed – and it works reliably

Color me suspicious, but I had a gut feeling that the only way this charger would be able to push out 1,000W would be if it caught fire. 

Turns out I wasn’t far wrong.

How long would it last? Answer: Minutes

Talk is cheap. It was time to test the charger. 

So I plugged it in, turned it on, and started using it. Within a couple of minutes of starting to use it, I noticed a few things:

  • No matter what I tried, I couldn’t persuade the charger to deliver more than about 60W from any of the ports. 
  • As for peak output, I managed to get close to 250W.
  • The power output was very uneven and noisy, fluctuating wildly. The more ports I used, the worse it got.
  • The unit got very hot to the touch very quickly, even under light loads. 
  • But… before I could get the thermal camera out to check how hot it got, there was a pop and the unmistakable smell of “Magic Smoke.” The charger had been sent to Silicon Heaven within minutes.

Annnnd… POP! This is the moment the charger gave up the ghost.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Diagnosis time

Time to take it apart and have a look inside. For an item that plugged into the mains power, this unit was shockingly easy to take apart. 

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

And even unplugged and broken, it was capable of delivering zaps! If the case came off while this was plugged into an outlet, it could very easily be deadly.

There’s charge still in some of the capacitors, and these could deliver quite a zap despite the unit being broken and unplugged!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

After getting inside, the unit was filled with a grey goo that I’d seen in a previous disappointing charger I’d taken apart. This is a thermal paste that’s used to try to dissipate the heat generated by the components. 

It’s not really going to work because it’s sealed in a plastic box with no effective heatsink. It’s a token gesture at best. At worst, it creates a mass that’ll slowly heat up and hold temperature because it’s got no way to get rid of it.

Behold the grey goo!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Next to this goo was a bank of capacitors — the black cylinders in the photo — which were the cause of the failure. They’d clearly overheated, with three of them showing signs of bulging.

The problem!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Well there’s the problem!

I also noticed that two of the components — bridge rectifiers that are used to turn AC mains into DC — have been fixed on an angle to make the touch a metal heatsink. It’s not really an effective way to cool down components.

The bottom line

Another “too good to be true” device bites the dust. It’s not the first one I’ve come across, and it won’t be the last.

Moral of the story here is that manufactures are using big number marketing — in this case 1,000W and masses of ports — to scalewash poor quality products. 

This might be a half-decent product if it was built to deliver 100W, but there’s no end of competition at that end of the market. Silkscreen “1,000W” on the outside, sprinkle in a few reviews that feel scripted and fake, and all of a sudden it’s interesting and exciting… right up until it blows up. 

Also: My top 7 laptop-bag essentials now, after decades of remote work

I know of no 1,000W charger. In fact, the 500W Ugreen Nexode is the highest-power charger that I’ve tested that’s legit. And the price is also legit — $250. 

But it’s built to deliver on what it promises and is packed with safety features, including “tip-over protection,” which cuts the output when the unit tips over and prevents it from falling on its side, where it can’t dissipate heat effectively. Now that’s an attention to safety that I like to see in a product that handles that much power. 

But if you want 1,000W of output, you’ll have to buy two and duct tape them together.





Source link