I cracked open a ‘1,000W’ portable charger after it failed me in minutes – the cause was clear (and gooey)


1,000W, 10-port charger for $45... predictably disappointing.

1,000W, 10-port charger for $45… predictably disappointing. 

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Things that look “too good to be true” invariable are just that.
  • This example got dangerously hot in a short period of time before dying. 
  • There’s no legitimate charger that comes close to delivering on the 1,000W promise.

Being a tech reviewer for a living means that I get offered some very interesting things. Not interesting as in Bugatti supercars or jewel-encrusted Fabergé eggs, but interesting as in “this thing could easily be a fire hazard — want to take a look?”

Also: The best GaN chargers of 2026: Expert tested

Submissively, I often say yes. And I’m glad I did with the most recent pitch, because it was very interesting indeed.

Meet the “interesting” charger

This time around, the thing of interest was a charger that claimed to deliver an incredible 1,000W through its ten ports — four 140W USB-C ports, four 100W USB-C ports, and two 20W USB-A ports. 

The person who bought this charger told me that they’d plugged it in, used it to charge their phone for “a few minutes,” got worried when it became “a little hot,” and unplugged it.

That's a lot of promise... but (spoilers), they don't deliver!

That’s a lot of promise… but (spoilers), they don’t deliver!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The unit was suspiciously light and plasticky, especially given its built-in power supply. Compare this to Ugreen’s Nexode 500W charger, which weighs a hair under 5 lb.

There was also a slight whiff of melty plastic, which made me think that this had been a bit more than a little hot. 

Also: This $4 router reboot timer is the cheap internet fix I didn’t know I needed – and it works reliably

Color me suspicious, but I had a gut feeling that the only way this charger would be able to push out 1,000W would be if it caught fire. 

Turns out I wasn’t far wrong.

How long would it last? Answer: Minutes

Talk is cheap. It was time to test the charger. 

So I plugged it in, turned it on, and started using it. Within a couple of minutes of starting to use it, I noticed a few things:

  • No matter what I tried, I couldn’t persuade the charger to deliver more than about 60W from any of the ports. 
  • As for peak output, I managed to get close to 250W.
  • The power output was very uneven and noisy, fluctuating wildly. The more ports I used, the worse it got.
  • The unit got very hot to the touch very quickly, even under light loads. 
  • But… before I could get the thermal camera out to check how hot it got, there was a pop and the unmistakable smell of “Magic Smoke.” The charger had been sent to Silicon Heaven within minutes.

Annnnd… POP! This is the moment the charger gave up the ghost.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Diagnosis time

Time to take it apart and have a look inside. For an item that plugged into the mains power, this unit was shockingly easy to take apart. 

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

And even unplugged and broken, it was capable of delivering zaps! If the case came off while this was plugged into an outlet, it could very easily be deadly.

There’s charge still in some of the capacitors, and these could deliver quite a zap despite the unit being broken and unplugged!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

After getting inside, the unit was filled with a grey goo that I’d seen in a previous disappointing charger I’d taken apart. This is a thermal paste that’s used to try to dissipate the heat generated by the components. 

It’s not really going to work because it’s sealed in a plastic box with no effective heatsink. It’s a token gesture at best. At worst, it creates a mass that’ll slowly heat up and hold temperature because it’s got no way to get rid of it.

Behold the grey goo!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Next to this goo was a bank of capacitors — the black cylinders in the photo — which were the cause of the failure. They’d clearly overheated, with three of them showing signs of bulging.

The problem!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Well there’s the problem!

I also noticed that two of the components — bridge rectifiers that are used to turn AC mains into DC — have been fixed on an angle to make the touch a metal heatsink. It’s not really an effective way to cool down components.

The bottom line

Another “too good to be true” device bites the dust. It’s not the first one I’ve come across, and it won’t be the last.

Moral of the story here is that manufactures are using big number marketing — in this case 1,000W and masses of ports — to scalewash poor quality products. 

This might be a half-decent product if it was built to deliver 100W, but there’s no end of competition at that end of the market. Silkscreen “1,000W” on the outside, sprinkle in a few reviews that feel scripted and fake, and all of a sudden it’s interesting and exciting… right up until it blows up. 

Also: My top 7 laptop-bag essentials now, after decades of remote work

I know of no 1,000W charger. In fact, the 500W Ugreen Nexode is the highest-power charger that I’ve tested that’s legit. And the price is also legit — $250. 

But it’s built to deliver on what it promises and is packed with safety features, including “tip-over protection,” which cuts the output when the unit tips over and prevents it from falling on its side, where it can’t dissipate heat effectively. Now that’s an attention to safety that I like to see in a product that handles that much power. 

But if you want 1,000W of output, you’ll have to buy two and duct tape them together.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Plex’s Remote Watch Pass is getting a 50% price hike starting June 1, 2026. Plex introduced the Remote Watch Pass in April 2025 as a cheaper alternative to the Plex Pass. Remote Watch Pass allows users to remotely stream from any Plex Media Server that a user has access to.

Remote Watch Pass essentially gives a user access to remote streaming, but that’s about it. It’s ideal for those who only want to use Plex as a viewer who is accessing someone else’s Plex Media Server. Core features and benefits of a Plex Server are locked behind the Plex Pass subscription instead.

Currently, Remote Watch Pass is available for $1.99 per month, and its annual plan is for $19.99. This has been the introductory price since the April launch last year. It’s now getting a price bump, and it’s a considerable increase.

A Reddit user received the price increase information via email and shared it with other users. The email said, “We hope you’re enjoying your Remote Watch Pass and the ability to stream personal media wherever you go. We wanted to let you know that your Remote Watch Pass introductory pricing is ending on June 1st, 2026. Beginning on June 1st, 2026, renewals for your subscription will be at the normal subscription price.”


A phone with the Plex logo and a laptop beside it with the Plex home screen.


Plex Pass Lifetime Memberships Double in Price Next Month, so Sign Up Now

Plex Pass will experience a major price hike on April 29th. Grab a lifetime membership today to avoid the price hike.

Plex Remote Watch Pass will increase from $1.99/month to $2.99/month, and its annual plan will increase from $19.99 to $29.99/year. Given that users have enjoyed the introductory price for over a year, the price increase was expected to come at some point.

Users who own a server and have a Plex Pass can share their benefits and let other users stream from their server for free. That’s another reason why Plex Pass continues to be the popular choice for Plex users. You can also get a Plex Pass lifetime subscription, but there’s no such option for Remote Watch Pass yet.

Sharing thoughts in the same Reddit post, there’s a majority of Plex users who feel that the Plex Pass lifetime pass, which is available for $249.99, is an increasingly attractive option. “Best thing I ever did was buy the lifetime pass,” shared one user.

However, for those who only want the Plex experience as a viewer on someone else’s server, the Remote Watch Pass is the cheaper option when compared to the standard pricing of a Plex Pass subscription, which is available for $6.99 per month, or $69.99 for a year.

Source: Reddit

Compatibility

Windows, Linux, macOS, Android, iOS, and various other devices

Free Trial Period

Free account available




Source link