I tested the 3 most popular Linux distros of April 2026, here’s how I rank them


The top three Linux distros on DistroWatch right now are CachyOS, Linux Mint, and MX Linux. I tested all three to understand what makes each one tick and who each one is really built for. One of them is for performance-obsessed users, one is for people tired of Windows, and one is quietly doing something most distros can’t. Here’s the full breakdown, and how I’d personally rank these three.

DistroWatch HPD page as of April 2026.

Defining “popular” is tricky when it comes to Linux. Unlike Windows or macOS, Linux distros don’t ship with telemetry, and there’s no central database tracking how many people are actually running any given distro. Nobody really knows the real numbers.

The closest thing we have is DistroWatch—a website that’s been cataloging and tracking Linux distros since 2001. It gets a lot of traffic from people in the Linux community looking up distros, reading release announcements, and comparing options. One of the metrics it tracks is HPD (hits per day)—basically how often people are landing on a particular distro’s page on the site.

While it doesn’t tell you how many people actually use a distro, it’s a decent proxy for what the community is paying attention to, and it’s been the go-to reference for this kind of thing for years. Based on DistroWatch’s April 2026 rankings, the top three are CachyOS, Linux Mint, and MX Linux—in that order. I tested all three, and at the end of this piece, I’ll give you my personal ranking.

CachyOS

Arch Linux + Performance gains – technical headaches = this distro

CachyOS is an Arch-based distro, and it’s been sitting at the top of DistroWatch’s popularity charts for over eighteen months now. That’s impressive because usually a distro pops up, grabs the #1 spot out of novelty, and then gets displaced by the regulars like Mint or Ubuntu. However, it’s clear that CachyOS is here to dominate and the reasons aren’t hard to see.

Firstly, it’s running KDE Plasma, which offers a familiar Windows-like experience that looks and feels more modern and customizable than Windows itself. The distro also comes with an optimized kernel—the CachyOS kernel—as well as many optimized packages to help you squeeze the most performance out of modern hardware—AMD Ryzen or Intel Haswell and later.

I tested CachyOS on my main PC running a Ryzen 5 5600G and Nvidia RTX 3060, and it genuinely felt snappier than most distros I’ve used, including Garuda Linux—my daily driver. This makes it an excellent distro for gamers. In fact, there’s a dedicated ISO for handheld gaming devices like the Steam Deck, Legion Go, and Legion Go S.

Steam Deck OLED Tag

Power Source

50Whr battery

What’s Included

Console, charger, carrying case

Brand

Valve

Screen

7.4-inch (diagonal) LCD display

Storage

512GB NVMe SSD

CPU

Zen 2 4c/8t, 2.4-3.5GHz

Elevate your gaming experience with the Steam Deck OLED. Immerse yourself in stunning visuals on the vibrant OLED display, while enjoying powerful performance and portability.


Furthermore, despite being an Arch-based distro, the developers have made it as beginner-friendly as possible. You get the CachyOS app, which gives you a graphical interface for routine maintenance. It also ships with Btrfs + Snapper for system snapshots, which ensures that if something breaks, you can just roll back to a previously working state from the GRUB menu.

The only downside I can think of is that since it’s a rolling release distro, you’ll need to update it regularly—at least once every two weeks. But the updates typically take less than 15 minutes, and if you’re okay with that, CachyOS can truly feel like the perfect distro.

You can download CachyOS from here.

CachyOS running Steam, Heroic Games Launcher, and the CachyOS Hello app.


Why This Distro Is More Popular Than Ubuntu and Linux Mint Right Now

How is CachyOS able to catch everyone’s attention?

Linux Mint

The distro that got people from ‘trying’ Linux to ‘staying’

Linux Mint is the most popular gateway distro—it’s what shows up whenever someone asks for the best Linux experience for newcomers. And it’s also one of the most successful distros that manages to retain users once they make the switch to Linux. Given the fact that most users started their Linux journey through Mint, it makes complete sense that it consistently sits near the top of DistroWatch. But why do so many users like Mint?

Well, Mint is by far one of the most flexible, beginner-friendly distros I’ve used, with a ridiculously high ceiling. It starts you off with a familiar Windows-like layout to ease your transition into Linux. But once you get comfortable, the distro grows with you. There are actually a bunch of powerful features hiding beneath the surface—not to overwhelm you if you’re new, but to reward your curiosity once you start to explore.

A few notable features include Nemo Actions, which lets you run bash scripts from the right-click context menu, fully customizable touchpad and touchscreen gestures with support for custom commands, a powerful extension system, and native support for desktop and panel widgets. You also get deep theming support. I was able to make Mint look like macOS, and it turned out pretty convincing.

Other than this, Mint is based on Ubuntu LTS, which means rock-solid stability and compatibility with almost every piece of hardware. The main downside is that packages in the official repository can be a bit dated, but that’s an easy problem to fix if you primarily download Flatpak apps.

You can download Linux Mint from here.

Linux Mint Logo on a default background.


I was too advanced for Linux Mint until I discovered these 3 power user features

Mint’s “beginner-friendly” reputation is hiding some serious power.

MX Linux

A serious distro for people seeking practical tools

I personally find it a shame that not many people know or talk about MX Linux. I have rarely seen articles or YouTube videos on the distro. Fortunately, real users do notice its charm and utility, earning it a place at the top of DistroWatch for the past few years now. In fact, MX Linux has been consistently beating more popular names like Ubuntu and Fedora. But what makes the distro so endearing?

Well, a big part of the reason is that the MX Linux team has made their distro compatible with a wide range of hardware. Firstly, the distro ships in three editions—KDE Plasma for modern machines, Xfce for mid-range systems, and Fluxbox for genuinely under-powered hardware. There’s also an AHS (Advanced Hardware Support) edition that ships with a newer kernel and updated graphics stack to make the distro more compatible with newer GPUs. This is important because MX Linux is based on Debian, which isn’t quite known for its support for the latest hardware.

The other thing that sets it apart is MX Tools—a collection of tools that let you tweak system-level settings through a graphical interface, similar to the Windows Control Panel. You get package management, GRUB configuration, system snapshots, cleanup tools—all in one place. On other distros, this kind of functionality is either fragmented or requires a terminal. MX Tools brings it all together and makes it accessible.

Finally, you’ve got native support for persistent live booting. You can essentially run MX Linux off a live USB and have your files, settings, and installed apps persist across reboots. This means you can carry your entire OS on a keychain. Granted, other distros also support persistent live booting, but they require some technical legwork. On MX Linux, this feature is a first-class citizen.

You can download MX Linux from here.

A desktop PC with MX Linux running and Fastfetch showing the MX Logo.


This distro nobody talks about is more popular than Ubuntu and Fedora—here’s 3 reasons why

The distro nobody talks about is beating the ones everybody uses.


How do I rank these three distros?

CachyOS takes the top spot for me—I’m a power user, and the performance gains are real and noticeable. MX Linux comes in second for its graphical tooling and persistent live USB support. Mint lands third, not because it’s bad, but because everything it offers beyond the basics I already get from KDE Plasma on the other two. Furthermore, my Linux journey started with Ubuntu, so I never had the Mint nostalgia.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link