I stopped using desktop icons on Windows, and you should too


The Windows desktop is iconic. Some of the backgrounds, the green rolling hills featured in Windows XP, have even become a bit of a meme. However, I do one thing very differently: I have completely removed all desktop icons from my desktop.

Too many icons cluttering things up

A cluttered desktop is a cluttered mind

Most every application you install on Windows will ask you a few things: where do you want it installed, do you want to install it for all users, do you want to add it to the Start Menu, and do you want a desktop icon?

If you don’t disable it manually, most will add a new desktop icon by default. After a few years of this, you’ll find that your desktop has become a cluttered catastrophe of icons, usually not organized in any particular way.

A messy Windows 11 desktop polluted with random files and folders.


Why I Like a Messy Windows Desktop

Another instance of where being the contrarian is better!

The entire situation is a bit weird. People spend time, and sometimes money, picking out a desktop background that they like. Why cover it up?

It would be like hanging a picture in your home and then covering it in sticky notes.

Moreover, I find the visual clutter pretty distracting. In an effort to make my day-to-day more efficient, I’ve been cutting out unnecessary distractions.

That meant the zoo of icons living on my desktop had to go.

Icons aren’t necessary or efficient

There are faster ways to find apps and files

After spending more than a minute hunting for an icon on my desktop, I realized this entire setup was flawed. Even if I organized them, I already knew which app I wanted. It isn’t like I need to be inspired by the icons on my desktop to do something.

Why waste time moving my mouse around when I already know what I want and there are a half dozen ways to get it without even touching the mouse?

A windows 11 laptop with some files being dumped into a trash can.


How to Debloat Windows 11 for Optimal Performance

Cut out the unnecessary stuff.

What to use instead of icons

There are two main ways I open and close apps instead of using icons. Both are Microsoft apps, so you don’t need to worry about third-party issues, and both are extremely efficient.

The Start Menu can pin apps, but it also doubles as a search. You don’t even need to click the search bar—just open it, start typing, and you’re off to the races.

For example, if I want to launch Firefox, all I need to do it tap the Windows key, type fi, then press the Enter key. What you have to search depends on what apps you have installed, but in any case, I’ve always found it to be more efficient than hunting around my desktop.

Searching for Firefox in the Start Menu.

Use Command Palette

Command Palette is one of the best introductions to Windows (via PowerToys) in recent years. It is a little bit like the Start Menu in that it functions like a search, but it also lets you pre-define search parameters with a single key, perform certain operations (like doing math or changing settings), and pretty much anything else you can imagine.

If you’ve used Spotlight Search on a Mac, you’re familiar with the idea.

Windows 11 screen with the Command Palette running and its icon highlighted.


This Open-Source App Made Me Abandon the Windows Start Menu

Don’t get bogged down by Bing search or ads in the Start Menu anymore.

Command Palette has become my primary—and almost exclusive—interface with Windows over the last several months. You can use almost any shortcut you want to open it.

Once you’re there, you don’t really need the desktop at all. You can access all the files and folders with a keystroke. I’ve always found that searching for files on my desktop is much quicker than trying to look around until I spot the right folder.

If Command Palette doesn’t have what you want natively, you can even make your own extension to build in the functionality.

For the moment, Command Palette isn’t included by default with Windows 11, but I certainly hope it becomes a permanent fixture in Windows 12—it is a major upgrade over the Start Menu.

How do you get rid of your desktop icons?

You could delete all of the icons off your desktop if you want—just press Ctrl+A and then hit the Delete key—but I wouldn’t recommend it.

Instead, you should right-click empty space on your desktop, then go to View and toggle off “Show desktop icons.”

Go to View, then untoggle "Show Desktop Icons."

That way, if you ever need them for some reason, you don’t have to go hunting around for whatever you had on your desktop.


That feels better, doesn’t it?

With all of the extra icons out of the way, my desktop feels more like the top of a clutter-free desk. I don’t have a random smattering of icons floating everywhere. All I have is one neat little window that disappears when I’m done, and my brain is happier for it.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link