I bought Kodak’s viral keychain camera, and the bad photos are part of its charm


I bought the Kodak Charmera partly because I wanted a portable digital camera, and partly because I wanted a pretty little collectible. The Charmera is sold as a blind box, so you do not know which version you are getting until the box is opened. There are multiple retro Kodak-style designs, plus a transparent secret edition that looks like the one everyone would want.

I had the shopkeeper pick my box for better luck, and it worked out. I got the yellow variant, which is inspired by Kodak’s original 80s disposable camera. The transparent one is definitely the fun collector’s piece, but the yellow model feels like the proper Kodak version. It looks like a tiny toy camera that escaped from a souvenir shop, found a keyring, and now hangs around wherever you go.

And after carrying it around for a few weeks, I get the hype.

This is a camera you buy for the feeling

The Kodak Charmera is very easy to judge harshly if you look at it like a normal camera. The sensor is tiny with an image output of just 1.6 megapixels. Even the screen is tiny, and the mic is weak. However, it catches the vibe perfectly.

This little thing is here for the mood. The photos have that soft, lo-fi digital texture that modern phone makers have spent a lot of money to avoid. There is not a lot of detail, dynamic range, or low-light confidence. What you get is a snapshot that looks like it jumped out of a forgotten folder on an old family computer. In good lighting, I had very few complaints because I knew exactly what I bought. The Charmera is fun for street shots, quick portraits, food, and other small moments.

There is a certain freedom in using a camera that clearly has no interest in perfection. You press the button, accept the result, and move on.

The low-light weakness is very real

The Charmera struggles once the lights go down. I took it to a gig on a Saturday night, which was probably one of the most unfair tests I could have given it. A dim venue, moving performers, colored lights, and a tiny sensor are not exactly a dream combination.

Its flash helped, but only a little. Photos in the dark have crushed details, noise, and blurring. But the funny thing is, I still liked a lot of the shots. They did not capture the performance with accuracy, but they captured the feeling of being there.

Videos are mostly for laughs

The Charmera can shoot video too, although I would not buy it for that. The footage has the same lo-fi character as the photos, and the built-in mic is rough. I recorded a bit of the band performing, and I will happily spare you the full experience of that terrible mic quality mixed with my voice.

Which is a shame, because the band was genuinely lovely. The set had that easy Saturday-night charm where everyone on stage seemed to be having as much fun as the room, and the Charmera ended up feeling like the right camera for that kind of memory.

Still, the video mode fits the camera’s personality. It feels like a tiny digital diary rather than a proper recording tool. You use it because it is there. After all, it is funny, and the result looks like something from a much older internet.

One of the best moments came after the set, when I asked the performers for a picture. The Charmera charmed them immediately. This was also one of its appeals. People react to it, smile at it, and ask about it. It turns a simple photo into a tiny interaction.

I get the hype now

The Charmera also arrives at the perfect moment. Older gadgets are having a real comeback. iPods are cool again. Digital cameras are popping up everywhere. People are chasing devices that are more deliberate, less algorithmic, and a little more personal.

It gives you the fun of a mystery box, the look of an old digital camera, and the convenience of something that can hang from a bag. The Kodak Charmera is easy to criticize as a camera. The photos are soft, the low light is rough, the video is weak, and your phone will beat it in every technical way without even trying. Yet none of that stopped me from wanting to carry it around. I bought it for fun and kept using it for the vibe.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


It’s the first of the month, which means Netflix has added a substantial number of new movies and shows. Some of the highlights include the Creed movies, Friday Night Lights, The Karate Kid franchise, and the first five seasons of Hawaii Five-0. Keep an eye on the new movies coming later this month, including Office Romance and Little Brother.

As for the thriller section, there are several movies to check out this week. My top pick is a recent crime thriller from an Academy Award-nominated director. My other two movies are total opposites. One is a disturbing psychological thriller featuring two familiar faces, while the other is a notable book-to-screen adaptation.

3

The Girl on the Train

Based on the bestselling novel

The Girl on the Train walked so that It Ends with Us could run. What do I mean? It’s not like The Girl on the Train was the first movie to be based on a book. I’m more focused on the style of thriller — a beach read that is predominantly aimed toward women. Hoover’s books continue to become box-office hits. In 2016, The Girl on the Train proved that there is an audience for this type of thriller.

Based on the novel by Paula Hawkins, The Girl on the Train stars Emily Blunt as Rachel Watson, an alcoholic divorcée who recently lost her job. To pass the time, Rachel rides the train and imagines the new life of her ex-husband, Tom (Justin Theroux), and his new wife, Anna (Rebecca Ferguson). One day, Rachel witnesses a troubling event in the backyard belonging to Scott (Luke Evans) and Megan Hipwell (Haley Bennett). The authorities don’t believe her due to her alcoholism, so Rachel will need more proof than her word.

The Girl on the Train has all the staples of a page-turning thriller. There are several twists that will make you question what is true and what is a lie. It’s a story of deceit and obsession that mixes sexual tension and disturbing violence into its storyline. Blunt gives a convincing performance as an alcoholic searching for answers in the case and in her personal life. At just under two hours, The Girl on the Train certainly delivers everything you want out of an entertaining thriller.

2

The Good Son

Kevin McCallister breaks bad

If your children enjoy the Home Alone franchise, then do not let them watch The Good Son. Speaking from experience, this movie should be consumed by teenagers and adults who are at least 17 years old. I watched this movie as a kid, and it shook me to my core. I would still recommend it because it’s genuinely one of the most shocking performances from an actor who you would never expect to take on this role.

After the death of his mother, 10-year-old Mark Evans (Elijah Wood) is sent to spend winter break with his Uncle Wallace (Daniel Hugh Kelly) and Aunt Susan (Wendy Crewson). Mark also reunited with his two young cousins, Henry (Macaulay Culkin) and Connie (Quinn Culkin). Mark quickly discovers that Henry might be the devil stuck inside a 10-year-old’s body. Henry is fascinated by death and facilitates several evil acts, including a massive car pileup. When Henry sets his sights on his own family, it’s up to Mark to stop it before it leads to tragedy.

Home Alone 2 is my favorite Christmas movie. Imagine being a kid and watching Kevin McCallister in The Good Son trying to kill his sister. Frankly, it’s disturbing. You can’t unsee what Culkin did as the devil’s child. I’ll let you judge it for yourself; my guess is you’ll agree with me.

1

Dead Man’s Wire

Inspired by a real standoff

Gus Van Sant is too talented to be sitting on the sidelines for a long period of time. Van Sant, who helmed Good Will Hunting and Milk, last made a film in 2018 called Don’t Worry, He Won’t Get Far on Foot. He did not make another film until Dead Man’s Wire, which had a festival premiere in 2025 before releasing in theaters in January 2026. That’s an unacceptable amount of time without a Van Sant movie. Be better, Hollywood.

Dead Man’s Wire is inspired by the true story of Tony Kiritsis, played by Bill Skarsgård. In February 1977, Tony takes mortgage broker Richard Hall (Dacre Montgomery) as his hostage after losing money on a deal brokered by Richard’s father. Tony points a sawed-off shotgun at Richard to serve as a dead man’s switch. The ensuing standoff makes headlines, as Tony tries to convince the public of what led to his breaking point.

The movie is based on a true story, so it could follow a blueprint of real-life events. However, it’s a genius idea for a thriller — a mentally unstable person seeks revenge against the corporation that wronged him. You might even find sympathy toward Tony, a credit to Skarsgård’s captivating performance.


More movies to watch this week

Thrillers are not the only genre to explore on Netflix. If you’re a fan of rom-coms, one of Netflix’s newest movies is Office Romance, a charming romantic adventure starring Jennifer Lopez and Brett Goldstein. Office Romance hits Netflix on June 5. Plus, Netflix users can stream the first six movies in the Rocky franchise.

Subscription with ads

Yes, $8/month

Simultaneous streams

Two or four




Source link