I bought an earwax camera for my toolkit and use it for everything but my ears


img-3665.jpg

Bebird Earsight Plus D39R

pros and cons

Pros

  • Camera is very clear.
  • The gyroscope keeps the image level, so it’s not spinning around.
  • The flexible neck makes this camera much easier to use.
Cons

  • It takes a long time to charge.
  • There are lots of ear-cleaning bits that aren’t needed if this tool is used as an inspection camera.
  • It is pricier than the fixed version.

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


I have a lot of tools, but I think the weirdest one is the earwax removal camera I bought a few years ago. It cost under $20, and it turned out to be a great inspection camera for poking into various places (it was actually my second device because I dropped a power station on the first one). I mean, the camera is meant for earholes, but I used mine for everything but ears — to find bolts I dropped in an engine bay, to peek inside misbehaving gadgets, or to get a view into places where my big head just couldn’t fit.

Also: The weirdest tool I own is also one of the most useful (and it’s only $6 on Amazon)

However, it had a limitation. It was just a camera on a stick. While I could make the device work most of the time, the times I couldn’t were frustrating. So, I’ve been on the lookout for an earwax removal camera with a flexible head. 

That’s when I found the Bebird Earsight Plus D39R.

See the best in you

Bebird’s tagline is “See the best in you.” 

Also: Our readers’ top 10 most-purchased gadgets shocked our editor (particularly No. 7)

Now, I’ve seen a lot of things in my time, and I’ll admit that the inside of someone’s earhole is not the best view, but to each their own. For the adventurous types out there, the device even comes with camera adapters for your nose, teeth, or throat.

See the best in you.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

There’s also an extensive range of tools included to tackle earwax and other bodily material. These tools attach securely to the camera, so they shouldn’t create additional ear, nose, or throat problems.

It comes with lots of "ear" tools!

The camera comes with lots of tools.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

But don’t worry — I won’t be showing anything like bodily details here. My primary reason for buying the device was that it’s a waterproof, dustproof, and fogproof camera at the end of a flexible stick, which I can use as an inspection tool.

Lots of don'ts!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

A worthy upgrade

It’s a great tool. The unit is built well and conforms to IP67, meaning it shrugs off dust, rain, splashes, and accidental submersion (though you should avoid total immersion). The soft polymer coating not only makes the device easy to clean, but also provides robustness for the inevitable drops.

The camera is rechargeable via a USB-C port on the end. A full charge (which takes about 50 minutes) gives the camera over an hour of runtime. When stored in its case, the unit also seems to hold its charge well.

Also: This tiny accessory gives your Android thermal vision superpowers (and works on iPhone, too)

One nice touch on the Earsight Plus D39R is that the flexible head has length markers, so you can see how deeply it’s been inserted. This capability makes sense for my purposes, but if you’re using this for ears or other body parts, keep in mind that these measurements are to the camera’s lens and don’t include the length of any attachment fitted on the end. I could see this setup causing issues if the user gets a bit too enthusiastic.

It’s all in the app

The camera connects to a smartphone via the Bebird app (available for iOS and Android) using Wi-Fi. The app allows you to control the intensity of the light on the front of the camera, adjust magnification, and capture stills or video.

What I see...

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET
... what the camera sees.

…and this is what the camera sees.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The output image is clear and stable, and I love how the camera uses its internal gyroscope to lock the horizontal image orientation.

The gyroscope keeps the camera image locked to the horizon, even when you rotate the camera.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Perfect for checking out carburetors!

The device is perfect for checking out carburetors.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

This locking capability makes the Earsight Plus D39R far easier to use than other cameras that rotate the image (though if you prefer that feature, you can enable it in the app settings).

Also: 10 DIY gadgets I never leave out of my toolkit (and why each one earns its spot)

The camera comes in a stylish carry case that holds all the tools you need to keep your ears clean. I’ve even repurposed a couple of the tools for different tasks. For instance, I glued a tiny neodymium magnet to one of them to recover small fasteners.

ZDNET’s buying advice

While the Bebird Earsight Plus D39R is more expensive than the basic alternatives, its superior build quality, flexible design, and advanced features make it a far better product overall.

Also: I’ve tested hundreds of gadgets over the years – these 10 I always keep handy

The Bebird Earsight Plus D39R comes in a neat carry case.

The Bebird Earsight Plus D39R comes in a neat carry case.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The ability to bend the camera and navigate around corners is a standout feature that significantly enhances its usability, whether you’re using the device for personal care or as an inspection tool. For $47, the camera offers excellent value for those who prioritize quality and functionality in their tools.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link