Google Fi is the best carrier I’m not allowed to use


If you’re a phone enthusiast in the U.S., you probably take the option of Google Fi for granted. But I live in Canada. I’m not allowed to use Google Fi as it’s simply unavailable outside the States. I wish it were, as it’s the best carrier for someone like me.

Pixel 10 Pro.

Brand

Google

SoC

Google Tensor G5


Google Fi provides data for all my devices

But I don’t have to pay for ‘unlimited’ access

It’s common for cell carriers to require an extra plan for your smartwatch, laptop, or tablet, even if it’s piggybacking on your primary phone service. It certainly does in Canada, where it’s common to pay $15 CAD (about $10 USD) per month just to share data with one other gadget. That’s prohibitively expensive for many people — I sometimes want to use cellular on my watch, but not so badly that I’d pay a premium for it.

That’s not a problem with Google Fi. Even the $35 per month Unlimited Essentials plan provides full data for the Pixel Watch and Samsung’s Galaxy Watch at no extra charge. And while I don’t have a cellular laptop or tablet just yet, it’s nice to know that a $65 Unlimited Premium plan would have me covered without tethering to my phone.

More importantly, the company isn’t charging for data I won’t use. While there are cheaper carriers if unlimited phone data is what you care about, I find most of Google Fi’s plans priced well given what’s included. Take AT&T’s $50 per month Extra 2.0 plan as an example: it does offer twice as much full-speed data at 100GB (plus 50GB for hotspots), but I’d lose out on smartwatch data and settle for 480p video streaming. If I’m on Wi-Fi most of the day, why lose so much functionality when I finally head outside?

Google Fi saves me money on phone upgrades

Why get my phone anywhere else?

Pixel 10 Pro XL in hand with stars in the background. Credit: Cory Gunther / How-To Geek

Yes, many carriers offer discounts when you buy new phones. But Google Fi’s deals are often uniquely sweet, especially if you’re a loyal Pixel fan.

Let’s say I want to buy a Pixel 10 Pro and take advantage of Google’s eagerness to make way for the Pixel 11. My Canadian carrier, AT&T, and others will happily offer the phone for free with the right two-year commitment. But their plans are usually more expensive than Fi, and Google is offering an immediate discount ($300 as I write this) with a year’s worth of AI Pro and 5TB of cloud storage.


A man using his phone, surrounded by internet, call, email, and message icons, with a reference to an unlimited data plan.


These Carriers Offer Genuinely Unlimited Data Plans

They say ‘unlimited,’ but what they mean is ‘unlimited…ish.

Google obviously hopes this will drive Pixel sales, and the promos aren’t quite so enticing for third-party phones like the Galaxy S26 Ultra. But they’re still good enough that they’d get me to upgrade early, and I’d still save some money even if I decided to leave Google Fi early. I’d just miss out on the full savings from sticking around for the full two years.

Yes, Google services matter

Security, privacy, and the cloud all count

A VPN by Google display sign with a lock icon and masked password graphic. Credit: Patrick Campanale / How-To Geek

Then there are the Google Fi-exclusive features. The service is linked to a Google account, so the carrier can more easily spot a SIM swap attack or robocall campaign. While virtually all U.S. carriers check for spam calls, Google has a slight edge. Throw in the bundled VPN access, and I’d feel safer without having to rely as much on third parties or on-device call screening.

No, it’s not worth signing up for Unlimited Premium just to get 100GB of Google One cloud storage. At $20 per year, it’s inexpensive enough to subscribe no matter what carrier I use. But if you’re like me and have even a moderate investment in Google products, bonuses like this add up. I already need One for my photos and Drive uploads — it’s nice to get that cloud data for ‘free.’


Not the perfect carrier, but right for me

I’ll be clear: Google Fi isn’t the best carrier for everyone. While it supports iPhones, you won’t get cellular Apple Watch support, encrypted calls, or international network switching. If you do need more phone data or greater plan flexibility, Mint Mobile and other low-cost providers might be better. Travel eSIMs could be superior for vacations. And of course, you’ll want to look elsewhere if you’re uncomfortable with leaning so heavily on Google in the first place. Google Fi would work for me, though, and I’d leap on it if it were available where I live.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Ghost CMS flaw abused to push ClickFix attacks on hundreds of sites

Pierluigi Paganini
May 25, 2026

Threat actors are actively exploiting a security flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-26980, in Ghost CMS that was fixed months ago in real attacks against unpatched websites. According to Qianxin, the campaign has already affected more than 700 sites, including well-known organizations and universities.

The vulnerability is an SQL injection issue in Ghost’s Content API that can let an attacker read data from the database without logging in. In the worst case, this can expose the Admin API key, which can allow attackers to take over the site.

That key matters because it can be used to change published content. In this campaign, attackers used it to edit articles on compromised Ghost sites and insert malicious JavaScript at the end of pages. The goal was not just defacement, but to turn trusted websites into launch points for further malware delivery.

“After an in-depth investigation and analysis, we determined that this was not a targeted intrusion against the customer, but rather a large-scale poisoning campaign by an in-the-wild attack group targeting Ghost CMS. Although CVE-2026-26980 was publicly disclosed as early as February 19, a large number of users did not patch and upgrade in time, providing an opportunity for attackers.” reads the advisory published by Qianxin. “At least two groups are currently actively conducting such poisoning operations, and some sites have even become the target of competition between the two parties, with different malicious code being implanted one after another within a single day.”

The inserted code led visitors through a two-step chain. First, the page loaded a remote script that checked the browser and decided what the visitor should see. Then real victims were redirected to a fake verification page that looked like a normal “I’m human” check.

This is where the ClickFix part began. The page told users to press Windows+R, paste a command, and hit Enter. In practice, that command downloaded and started a malware payload on the victim’s machine. It was a classic social engineering trick: make the user do the dangerous part themselves.

Qianxin says the first signs of this activity appeared in early May. The malicious code found in the campaign had a compilation date of February 16, the same day Ghost announced the fix for CVE-2026-26980. That suggests the attackers moved quickly once they saw how many sites had not been updated.

The affected websites cover a wide range of sectors. Roughly half are personal blogs or independent sites, but the list also includes technology blogs, AI sites, media outlets, crypto projects, and educational institutions. Qianxin researchers say victims include sites linked to Harvard, Oxford, and DuckDuckGo.

The attack chain was also designed to be flexible. The loaders could fetch different payloads depending on the target, and the operators changed infrastructure several times.

“entire attack process has obvious five-stage characteristics of “CMS Takeover → Page Poisoning → Two-stage Loading → Social Engineering Lure (FakeCaptcha/ClickFix) → Malware Delivery”, and the entire process is highly automated: bulk vulnerability scanning → automatic key extraction → bulk injection → dynamic C2 distribution.” states the report.

In some cases, they switched domains after detection, keeping the campaign alive even when part of the chain was blocked.

“Through feature scanning of publicly accessible pages, we have cumulatively identified more than 700 poisoned victim domains, and have proactively contacted the sites for which contact information could be obtained, notifying them of the poisoning.” continues the report.

Qianxin also believes at least two different groups are involved. In some cases, the same site was hit more than once, with one attacker replacing the code left by another. That makes the campaign harder to clean up and shows how attractive compromised Ghost sites have become for abuse.

For site owners, the advice is straightforward. Ghost should be updated immediately, all credentials should be rotated, and site logs should be reviewed for suspicious admin API activity. Any injected scripts should be removed from the database itself, not just from the visual editor. Visitors who may have reached a poisoned site should also be warned.

The report includes Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) for the attacks observed by the researchers.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, Ghost CMS)







Source link