FTC freezes sprawling subscription enterprise built on Cyprus and Delaware shells


A federal court has temporarily shut down what the US Federal Trade Commission describes as a sprawling enterprise of deceptive subscription apps, freezing the operations of 15 corporations and eight individuals accused of charging consumers without permission and making cancellation deliberately hard.

The order, granted at the agency’s request, came alongside a complaint filed on 17 June in the US District Court for the Northern District of California.


At the centre sits Genesis Tech, which the FTC alleges operated as a single common enterprise behind a portfolio of unrelated-looking products. The roster reads like a tour of the app stores’ long tail: the fitness and nutrition apps MadMuscles, Harna, and Unimeal; the PDF editors PDF Guru and PDF Master; a fashion-advice app called Lumi; the self-help brand Wisey, which the agency says marketed courses claiming to diagnose and treat ADHD symptoms; and Nebula, a horoscope and psychic-chat app.

The complaint names founder-CEOs Vladimir Mnogoletny and Vasily Ulianov, along with six other co-defendants.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The structure is the part the FTC lingers on. According to the complaint, Genesis Tech ran through a chain of affiliates incorporated in Cyprus and operating in Ukraine, which marketed the apps to American users while routing payment processing through counterpart companies registered in Delaware.

As fraud-monitoring systems caught up with one merchant account, the agency alleges, the operators simply registered another company and opened a fresh account, then moved the proceeds across borders between affiliates. It is the corporate equivalent of changing your name every time the bill arrives.

The money was not small. From early 2023 to mid-2025, five of the products alone brought in nearly a quarter of a billion dollars in global revenue, the complaint says. The transactions through the enterprise’s connected PayPal accounts totalled nearly $700m in the 12 months ending September 2025.

The alleged playbook was consistent across the catalogue. Products were advertised as free or as a low one-time purchase, often with a money-back guarantee, while the auto-renewing subscription was relegated to the smallest print on the page. The defendants then added charges consumers had not agreed to, the FTC says, double-billing for the same product or quietly bundling in extras.

And cancellation was an obstacle course: options missing from apps and websites, demands that users explain why they wanted to leave, and, in some cases, charges that continued even after a cancellation had been confirmed.

The agency alleges the conduct violates both the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act, the 2010 law written for exactly this kind of recurring-billing trap.

“The Trump-Vance FTC is engaged in robust enforcement to address deception and illegal subscription offerings,” said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection, calling the case an illustration of the bureau’s “reinvigorated anti-fraud program.”

The Commission voted 2-0 to authorise the complaint. The named co-defendants are Stamatis Skianis, Oksana Kucher, Iryna Oleksyn, Olga Garbuzenko, Rostyslav Ivanitsa, and Viktoriia Savchuk.

The FTC files a complaint only when it has reason to believe the law is being broken; the allegations are unproven, and the case will be decided by the court.

For Apple and Google, the case is less a verdict than a diagnosis. A network that can spin up new shells faster than the stores can flag the old ones is not a single bad app to be removed. It is a moving target, and the FTC has just described, in some detail, how the target moves.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Ghost CMS flaw abused to push ClickFix attacks on hundreds of sites

Pierluigi Paganini
May 25, 2026

Threat actors are actively exploiting a security flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-26980, in Ghost CMS that was fixed months ago in real attacks against unpatched websites. According to Qianxin, the campaign has already affected more than 700 sites, including well-known organizations and universities.

The vulnerability is an SQL injection issue in Ghost’s Content API that can let an attacker read data from the database without logging in. In the worst case, this can expose the Admin API key, which can allow attackers to take over the site.

That key matters because it can be used to change published content. In this campaign, attackers used it to edit articles on compromised Ghost sites and insert malicious JavaScript at the end of pages. The goal was not just defacement, but to turn trusted websites into launch points for further malware delivery.

“After an in-depth investigation and analysis, we determined that this was not a targeted intrusion against the customer, but rather a large-scale poisoning campaign by an in-the-wild attack group targeting Ghost CMS. Although CVE-2026-26980 was publicly disclosed as early as February 19, a large number of users did not patch and upgrade in time, providing an opportunity for attackers.” reads the advisory published by Qianxin. “At least two groups are currently actively conducting such poisoning operations, and some sites have even become the target of competition between the two parties, with different malicious code being implanted one after another within a single day.”

The inserted code led visitors through a two-step chain. First, the page loaded a remote script that checked the browser and decided what the visitor should see. Then real victims were redirected to a fake verification page that looked like a normal “I’m human” check.

This is where the ClickFix part began. The page told users to press Windows+R, paste a command, and hit Enter. In practice, that command downloaded and started a malware payload on the victim’s machine. It was a classic social engineering trick: make the user do the dangerous part themselves.

Qianxin says the first signs of this activity appeared in early May. The malicious code found in the campaign had a compilation date of February 16, the same day Ghost announced the fix for CVE-2026-26980. That suggests the attackers moved quickly once they saw how many sites had not been updated.

The affected websites cover a wide range of sectors. Roughly half are personal blogs or independent sites, but the list also includes technology blogs, AI sites, media outlets, crypto projects, and educational institutions. Qianxin researchers say victims include sites linked to Harvard, Oxford, and DuckDuckGo.

The attack chain was also designed to be flexible. The loaders could fetch different payloads depending on the target, and the operators changed infrastructure several times.

“entire attack process has obvious five-stage characteristics of “CMS Takeover → Page Poisoning → Two-stage Loading → Social Engineering Lure (FakeCaptcha/ClickFix) → Malware Delivery”, and the entire process is highly automated: bulk vulnerability scanning → automatic key extraction → bulk injection → dynamic C2 distribution.” states the report.

In some cases, they switched domains after detection, keeping the campaign alive even when part of the chain was blocked.

“Through feature scanning of publicly accessible pages, we have cumulatively identified more than 700 poisoned victim domains, and have proactively contacted the sites for which contact information could be obtained, notifying them of the poisoning.” continues the report.

Qianxin also believes at least two different groups are involved. In some cases, the same site was hit more than once, with one attacker replacing the code left by another. That makes the campaign harder to clean up and shows how attractive compromised Ghost sites have become for abuse.

For site owners, the advice is straightforward. Ghost should be updated immediately, all credentials should be rotated, and site logs should be reviewed for suspicious admin API activity. Any injected scripts should be removed from the database itself, not just from the visual editor. Visitors who may have reached a poisoned site should also be warned.

The report includes Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) for the attacks observed by the researchers.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, Ghost CMS)







Source link