Do Apple’s new AirPods Max 2 beat the Airpods Pro 3? I’ve tried both, here’s my take


AirPods Max 2 in Starlight

The AirPods Max 2 and AirPods Pro 3 share the same H2 audio chip.

Jada Jones/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • The AirPods Max 2 are best-suited for Apple power users.
  • Users with only an iPhone will find more utility in the AirPods Pro 3.
  • iPhone users with mixed-device ecosystems will find more value in Sony or Bose over-ears.

The AirPods Max 2 are here, and I’m confident several people are weighing whether to buy their first pair of Apple over-ears, but a $549 asking price isn’t one to sneeze at. If it’s solely Apple’s intelligent features like Adaptive Audio, Live Translation, and Conversation Awareness that excite you, I’d say you would most benefit by investing in the AirPods Pro 3, and another brand of over-ears instead. Here’s why.

Software-wise, they’re very similar

The AirPods Pro 3 and the AirPods Max 2 share Apple’s premium H2 audio chip, meaning they offer the same software features and audio processing. Both offer Apple’s host of intelligent features including Live Translation, Adaptive Audio, exceptional noise cancellation and Transparency Mode, Personalized Volume, Camera Remote, Voice Isolation, and Siri Interactions.

Review: AirPods Max 2

Both the AirPods Pro 3 and AirPods Max 2 support Apple’s studio-quality voice recording for enhanced voice clarity across phone calls, FaceTime, Voice Memos, the Camera app, and compatible third-party applications. Additionally, both support Audio Sharing with another pair of AirPods or Beats headphones and connect to an Apple TV 4K in Spatial Audio.

What changed from generation to generation

AirPods Pro 3 and iPhone 16

Jada Jones/ZDNET

Apple upgraded the AirPods Pro 3’s acoustic structure, implementing new 10.7mm high-excursion drivers for deeper bass, a high-dynamic-range amplifier for vibrancy, and additional ports for a wider soundstage. The Pro 3’s upgraded microphones, audio processing algorithms, eartips, and acoustic structure result in improved audio performance, noise cancellation, and Transparency Mode.

They also received Apple’s second-gen U2 ultra wideband chip for more precise device location, a new shape for enhanced fit, an IP57 waterproofing upgrade, and infrared sensors to track heart rate and calories burned during a workout.

Also: AirPods Pro 3 fitness feature surprises triathlete tester – here’s what he found

The AirPods Max 2 received Apple’s advanced H2 chip, the same chip inside the AirPods Pro 3, bringing improved audio quality and a high-dynamic-range amplifier. The Max 2’s enhanced audio performance is most evident when listening to music, gaming on Apple devices, and watching with an Apple TV 4K. 

Like the 2024 USB-C version, AirPods Max 2 also supports ultra-low latency and 24-bit/48kHz lossless audio via a wired connection, comes with a Smart Case, offers the same weight distribution and fit, promises 20 hours of battery life, and comes in the same colors. 

Why I advocate for the AirPods Pro 3

AirPods Pro 3

Jada Jones/ZDNET

With just an iPhone, you can access almost everything the AirPods Pro 3 have to offer. If it’s the only Apple device you use regularly, you make a lot of phone calls, or you want a pair of Apple headphones to work out in, you’ll find more utility in the AirPods Pro 3.

The AirPods Pro 3 are Apple’s best earbuds yet, offering every smart feature it has to offer in a portable and waterproof form factor. They are highly versatile, as users can maximize their performance in the office, gym, grocery store, and at home — all in the same day. Unlike the AirPods Max 2, the AirPods Pro 3 are waterproof, have a heart rate sensor, and are easier to clean; making a better option for the gym.

Review: AirPods Pro 3

The AirPods Pro 3 have better microphone voice pickup, thanks to their placement at the bottom of the earbud stem, closer to your mouth. Their improved in-ear seal creates solid passive noise cancellation, and their upgraded noise processing creates better algorithmic noise cancellation.

I use these earbuds in all facets of my life: I wear them while I work, grocery shop, take hands-free phone calls while I drive (Transparency Mode is essential for this), and can easily pop them in and out of my pocket for quick insertion or removal.

Who I recommend the AirPods Max 2 for

AirPods Max 2 and iPhone 17

Jada Jones/ZDNET

On the other hand, the AirPods Max 2 are best for people who have an expansive Apple device ecosystem. If you regularly use an iMac, MacBook, and iPad for gaming or professional audio tasks, like to watch Apple TV privately, and have an iPhone, the AirPods Max 2 fit more snugly into your ecosystem.

Also: I used Apple Music’s new AI tool to break out of my music rut – and it worked

You can maximize the AirPods Max 2 by owning multiple Apple devices to connect them to, as each device unlocks new AirPods Max 2 capabilities. These headphones are a high-end Apple product and offer the most utility to Apple power users. Apple’s seamless device switching also lets users switch their AirPods Max’s connectivity based on which device is active, a solid feature for someone with multiple devices.

Which other over-ears to consider

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 2 in Driftwood Sand

Jada Jones/ZDNET

If you’d benefit from investing in the AirPods Pro 3 instead of the AirPods Max 2, I recommend the Bose QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen) as your over-ear headphones. I especially recommend this choice if your over-ear checklist includes headphones with high-performing noise cancellation, suitable for the gym and travel. 

Also: Bose’s QuietComfort Ultra shows the company still outperforms Apple in one key area

The QC Ultra 2’s lightweight design and 30 hours of battery life make ideal for hours-long wear, and their software agnosticism works just as well for iPhone users a with a tablet or laptop from another brand. Additionally, Bose upgraded the second-generation model with 16-bit/44.1kHz or 48kHz (CD standard) USB-C audio, which is generally fine for everyday listeners and some casual gamers. Any higher resolution is likely to be noticeable to those with trained ears.

Also: I wore 5 different headphones across 8 flights – here’s how each pair handled my stress tests

You can also consider the Sony WH-1000XM6, a feature-rich pair of headphones with great audio and noise-canceling capabilities. These headphones are also lighter and more portable than the AirPods Max 2, making them a better option for exercising and traveling. Sony’s XM6 headphones allow users more control over their device, offering LDAC and LC3 codecs and a detailed equalizer.

ZDNET’s buying advice

To put it simply, if your Apple ecosystem consists solely of an iPhone, the AirPods Pro 3 will give you the most bang for your buck. If you have a broad Apple ecosystem, the AirPods Max 2 deliver deep integration across your devices. 

The AirPods Max 2 are compatible with professional-quality audio across your Apple devices, but if you had gripes with the first generation’s fit and weight, battery life, or carrying case for everyday use, consider your over-ear options from Sony and Bose.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link