Deezer launches a remix tool that does not use AI and pays artists for every stream



TL;DR

Deezer launched Remix Lab, letting fans remix songs with in-app tools and artist consent while paying royalties, deliberately avoiding AI.

Deezer has launched Remix Lab, a feature that lets fans remix songs directly inside the app using in-app tools rather than artificial intelligence. The feature requires the explicit consent of the original artists and rights holders, and Deezer says artists get paid for every stream of the remixed tracks.

The tool is available on select artists’ pages within the Deezer app in France. Users can adjust tempo, add reverb, or make more substantial changes such as shifting a track’s genre or style, according to head of product Pierre Trochu.

The distinction Deezer is drawing is deliberate. Spotify, which has struggled with AI-generated content on its platform, signed a landmark licensing deal with Universal Music Group in May that lets Premium subscribers create AI-generated covers and remixes of participating artists’ catalogues. YouTube’s Dream Track programme uses Google’s AI to let creators restyle licensed songs through text prompts.

Deezer’s approach skips AI entirely. The remix tools are built into the app, and the results depend on what users do with tempo, effects, and style controls rather than what a generative model produces. The company frames this as consistent with its broader position against AI-generated music on streaming platforms.

Deezer launched a free tool earlier this month that scans playlists on Spotify, Apple Music, and other services for AI-generated tracks. The company says it receives nearly 75,000 fully AI-generated tracks every day, more than 44 percent of everything uploaded to the platform. It actively removes AI tracks from its recommendations and editorial playlists.

This remix tool perfectly embodies our vision of offering a product that enriches the listening experience for fans, by allowing them to participate in the creative process and create a deeper connection with their favourite music,” CEO Alexis Lanternier said. He added that the features are “made possible with full participation of the artists, fully respecting rights, and maximising earnings for each track.

The launch includes tracks from Celine Dion, Alain Souchon, Alonzo, Ronisia, Mosimann, Tiakola, and Zaho. Users can also enter contests through Deezer Club, with winning remixes featured in a dedicated Deezer playlist and winners receiving tickets to a Deezer Purple Door event along with artist merchandise. Contest winners will be announced in early September.

The feature is initially available only in France, with plans to expand to other countries. Deezer has not provided a timeline for the broader rollout.

The debate over how streaming services should handle remixes has split the industry. Spotify and Universal argue that AI-generated fan covers, built on a consent-credit-compensation framework, give artists a new revenue stream. Critics, including researchers interviewed by WBUR, counter that AI remixes flood platforms with more synthetic content and make it harder for human artists to gain traction in an already crowded market.

Deezer is betting on the other side of that argument. The company posted 132 million euros in first-quarter revenue, down slightly year over year, but grew its direct subscriber base nine percent to 5,700,000. It remains far smaller than Spotify, which gives it less to lose and more reason to differentiate.

Whether a non-AI remix tool limited to a handful of French artists can compete with the scale of Spotify’s AI-powered offering is an open question. But for a company that has built its recent identity around being the anti-AI-slop streaming service, Remix Lab is a consistent next step.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


I reluctantly upgraded from my Pixel 4a in late 2024, which means I spent four years clinging to a phone that still felt like a phone. Part of that was the size. The Pixel 4a was small enough to use without performing thumb yoga, a disappearing luxury now that flagships have settled into pocket-tablet territory. That’s an argument for another day.

The uglier issue is what happened after I moved on. In January 2025, Google pushed an automatic Android 13 update to Pixel 4a phones. Google’s own support page says the update reduced available battery capacity and affected charging performance on some impacted devices. Reddit users were less polite. One r/Pixel4a post said the battery suddenly had “around 40% of its former capacity” after the patch.

For poor ol’ 4a, that was basically the death knell.

When an update becomes the problem

A dying battery is normal. A four-year-old phone needing service isn’t exactly a scandal. Batteries age, screens fail, ports loosen, and gravity remains undefeated.

This felt different. The phone didn’t simply get old in someone’s pocket. Its usable life changed after a company-controlled patch, and the owner was left to deal with the result. The Verge reported that the update was tied to overheating-risk mitigation and reduced charging capacity by more than 50% on affected units. Battery safety is real. It still doesn’t erase the experience of waking up to a phone that suddenly can’t survive the day.

That’s what update death looks like. Software doesn’t just support aging hardware anymore. It can also decide when that hardware becomes miserable to keep using.

When every patch feels haunted

My wife, who’s rocking an S24 Ultra, has a different version of the same dread. She keeps running into Reddit threads about Samsung Galaxy phones and the dreaded green line, that bright vertical scar that makes a screen look like it has been reassigned to a cyberpunk prop department. One r/S23 user wrote that a green line appeared on a carefully maintained phone after about a year and a half, then said Samsung service quoted a screen replacement because the warranty was over. Another Samsung Community post claimed a green-line issue appeared after an August update, with the display allegedly working perfectly before it.

Reddit isn’t a forensic lab with avatars. A green line can come from boring hardware failure, not corporate villainy with a release calendar. Still, the anxiety is real. People don’t only worry that an update will move a button or ruin a camera setting. They worry it might be the thing that nudges a working device from “old” to “not worth repairing.”

Modern gadgets are never fully handed over. They keep phoning home. They keep asking for patches. They keep depending on decisions made long after the receipt has faded. Ownership now comes with a quiet asterisk.

The graveyard got software updates

Planned obsolescence used to sound like tinfoil-hat consumer paranoia, which was convenient for everyone selling the new thing. Then regulators started writing it down in boring official language. In 2018, Italy’s competition authority fined Samsung and Apple after finding that software and firmware updates caused serious malfunctions, reduced performance, and sped up replacement of older phones. Samsung was fined €5 million, while Apple was fined €10 million.

Apple’s battery-throttling mess made the suspicion harder to laugh off. In the US, Apple agreed to a settlement of up to $500 million over claims that it slowed older iPhones, while a separate multistate settlement required Apple to pay $113 million over alleged misrepresentations around iPhone batteries and performance throttling. Consumers weren’t hallucinating the pattern. The receipts were scattered across court filings, regulatory decisions, and phones that suddenly felt older than they had the day before.

Europe seems less willing to accept “trust us” as a product-lifetime policy. New EU rules for smartphones and tablets started applying on June 20, 2025, covering durability, repairability, battery life, and software updates. New labels put some of that lifespan math in front of shoppers before checkout.

The post-warranty graveyard used to be easy to recognize: cracked screens, swollen batteries, and charging ports full of pocket lint. Now the graveyard has paperwork, compatibility warnings, and software that slowly stops cooperating. The gadget can still turn on. It can still look fine on a desk. Then one day the company changes what “usable” means, and the thing you paid for starts practicing being trash.



Source link