The post-warranty graveyard is filling up with working gadgets


I reluctantly upgraded from my Pixel 4a in late 2024, which means I spent four years clinging to a phone that still felt like a phone. Part of that was the size. The Pixel 4a was small enough to use without performing thumb yoga, a disappearing luxury now that flagships have settled into pocket-tablet territory. That’s an argument for another day.

The uglier issue is what happened after I moved on. In January 2025, Google pushed an automatic Android 13 update to Pixel 4a phones. Google’s own support page says the update reduced available battery capacity and affected charging performance on some impacted devices. Reddit users were less polite. One r/Pixel4a post said the battery suddenly had “around 40% of its former capacity” after the patch.

For poor ol’ 4a, that was basically the death knell.

When an update becomes the problem

A dying battery is normal. A four-year-old phone needing service isn’t exactly a scandal. Batteries age, screens fail, ports loosen, and gravity remains undefeated.

This felt different. The phone didn’t simply get old in someone’s pocket. Its usable life changed after a company-controlled patch, and the owner was left to deal with the result. The Verge reported that the update was tied to overheating-risk mitigation and reduced charging capacity by more than 50% on affected units. Battery safety is real. It still doesn’t erase the experience of waking up to a phone that suddenly can’t survive the day.

That’s what update death looks like. Software doesn’t just support aging hardware anymore. It can also decide when that hardware becomes miserable to keep using.

When every patch feels haunted

My wife, who’s rocking an S24 Ultra, has a different version of the same dread. She keeps running into Reddit threads about Samsung Galaxy phones and the dreaded green line, that bright vertical scar that makes a screen look like it has been reassigned to a cyberpunk prop department. One r/S23 user wrote that a green line appeared on a carefully maintained phone after about a year and a half, then said Samsung service quoted a screen replacement because the warranty was over. Another Samsung Community post claimed a green-line issue appeared after an August update, with the display allegedly working perfectly before it.

Reddit isn’t a forensic lab with avatars. A green line can come from boring hardware failure, not corporate villainy with a release calendar. Still, the anxiety is real. People don’t only worry that an update will move a button or ruin a camera setting. They worry it might be the thing that nudges a working device from “old” to “not worth repairing.”

Modern gadgets are never fully handed over. They keep phoning home. They keep asking for patches. They keep depending on decisions made long after the receipt has faded. Ownership now comes with a quiet asterisk.

The graveyard got software updates

Planned obsolescence used to sound like tinfoil-hat consumer paranoia, which was convenient for everyone selling the new thing. Then regulators started writing it down in boring official language. In 2018, Italy’s competition authority fined Samsung and Apple after finding that software and firmware updates caused serious malfunctions, reduced performance, and sped up replacement of older phones. Samsung was fined €5 million, while Apple was fined €10 million.

Apple’s battery-throttling mess made the suspicion harder to laugh off. In the US, Apple agreed to a settlement of up to $500 million over claims that it slowed older iPhones, while a separate multistate settlement required Apple to pay $113 million over alleged misrepresentations around iPhone batteries and performance throttling. Consumers weren’t hallucinating the pattern. The receipts were scattered across court filings, regulatory decisions, and phones that suddenly felt older than they had the day before.

Europe seems less willing to accept “trust us” as a product-lifetime policy. New EU rules for smartphones and tablets started applying on June 20, 2025, covering durability, repairability, battery life, and software updates. New labels put some of that lifespan math in front of shoppers before checkout.

The post-warranty graveyard used to be easy to recognize: cracked screens, swollen batteries, and charging ports full of pocket lint. Now the graveyard has paperwork, compatibility warnings, and software that slowly stops cooperating. The gadget can still turn on. It can still look fine on a desk. Then one day the company changes what “usable” means, and the thing you paid for starts practicing being trash.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Global law enforcement operation takes First VPN offline

Pierluigi Paganini
May 21, 2026

Police seized First VPN in a global crackdown, exposed its cybercrime users, and shut down infrastructure tied to ransomware and data theft.

A major international law enforcement operation has taken First VPN offline, a service that had become a quiet staple for ransomware crews, data thieves, and other cybercriminals trying to hide in plain sight.

“The coordinated action took place between 19 and 20 May and targeted the infrastructure behind one of the most widely used VPN services in the cybercrime underground.” reads the press release published by Europol. “The gathered intelligence exposed thousands of users linked to the cybercrime ecosystem and generated operational leads connected to ransomware attacks, fraud schemes, and other serious offences worldwide.”

Authorities seized dozens of servers across 27 countries, arrested the administrator, and carried out a search in Ukraine, cutting off an infrastructure that had been used in a wide range of serious investigations.

The service marketed itself as a privacy-first VPN with no logging and no cooperation with law enforcement, which made it appealing not just to ordinary users but also to threat actors looking to mask their activity. That’s the uncomfortable part of the VPN story: the same tools that help people protect privacy on public Wi-Fi or work securely from home are also useful for criminals who want to conceal their origin, route traffic through different regions, and make attribution harder.

“For years, the service, known as ‘First VPN’, was promoted on Russian-speaking cybercrime forums as a trusted tool for remaining beyond the reach of law enforcement. It offered users anonymous payments, hidden infrastructure, and services designed specifically for criminal use.” continues the press release. “‘First VPN’ had become deeply embedded in the cybercrime ecosystem, appearing in almost every major cybercrime investigation supported by Europol in recent years. Criminals used it to conceal their identities and infrastructure while carrying out ransomware attacks, large-scale fraud, data theft, and other serious offences.”

Europol said the service name kept resurfacing in major cybercrime cases, and Eurojust confirmed that investigators had been building the case for years through a joint effort led by French and Dutch authorities. 

What seems to have made this case especially valuable for investigators is that they didn’t just shut the service down, they also got inside its infrastructure before it disappeared. That likely gave them access to user records, connection data, and other evidence that can be used to map criminal activity back to real people and devices.

Authorities dismantled cybercrime infrastructure, including 33 servers and a service based in Ukraine, and seized domains linked to the operation: 1vpns.com, 1vpns.net, 1vpns.org, plus associated onion sites. They also notified users directly and shared information on hundreds of accounts with international partners, which suggests this may lead to follow-on investigations well beyond the VPN itself.

The bigger lesson is simple: privacy tools are not the problem, but criminal operators often rely on the same infrastructure normal users trust. Once that infrastructure is compromised, dismantled, or logged, the illusion of anonymity can disappear very quickly.

“The operation has already generated significant operational results at Europol’s level:

  • 21 Europol-supported investigations advanced through the intelligence obtained.”
  • 83 intelligence packages disseminated;
  • information linked to 506 users shared internationally;

“For years, cybercriminals saw this VPN service as a gateway to anonymity. They believed it would keep them beyond the reach of law enforcement. This operation proves them wrong. Taking it offline removes a critical layer of protection that criminals depended on to operate, communicate and evade law enforcement.” said Edvardas Šileris, Head of Europol’s European Cybercrime Centre

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, First VPN)







Source link