Apple could go back to Intel for chips, but not how you would expect (or dread)


Apple and Intel are reportedly exploring a manufacturing partnership that could reshape how future Apple chips are produced. But despite the headline, this does not mean Apple is abandoning Apple Silicon or returning to Intel-powered Macs.

According to a new Wall Street Journal report, Apple and Intel have reached a preliminary agreement for Intel to manufacture some chips designed by Apple. Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman later clarified on X that there is still no finalized production agreement in place and discussions remain at an early stage. His post also noted that Apple continues to have concerns about Intel’s manufacturing technology and long-term competitiveness.

Apple’s Intel discussions are more about manufacturing than replacing Apple Silicon

The most important detail here is that Apple would still design its own chips. Intel’s role, if the deal progresses, would involve manufacturing some of those processors through Intel Foundry Services rather than replacing Apple’s in-house silicon strategy.

That distinction matters because Apple’s transition away from Intel processors in 2020 fundamentally changed the Mac lineup. Apple Silicon chips, such as the M-series processors, gave Apple tighter control over performance, efficiency, thermals, and AI capabilities. Nothing in the current reports suggests Apple plans to reverse that direction.

Instead, the discussions appear to center around supply chain diversification. Apple currently relies heavily on TSMC for manufacturing chips used in iPhones, iPads, Macs, and other devices. However, growing AI demand from companies like Nvidia has increased pressure on advanced semiconductor production capacity.

The WSJ report notes that Apple has faced ongoing supply constraints for some products, with Tim Cook previously acknowledging shortages affecting Mac availability. Working with Intel could potentially give Apple a secondary manufacturing option alongside TSMC.

The talks also carry broader geopolitical and industry implications

The Trump administration reportedly played an active role in encouraging partnerships between Intel and major technology companies. Intel has already secured partnerships with Nvidia and Elon Musk-linked projects, while the U.S. government now holds a 10% stake in the company following a multibillion-dollar investment deal.

For Intel, landing Apple as a foundry customer would represent a major validation of its efforts to rebuild manufacturing credibility after years of falling behind TSMC and Samsung. Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan has spent the past year restructuring leadership, investing heavily in advanced manufacturing processes like 14A, and repositioning Intel Foundry as a serious competitor.

What happens next remains uncertain. Gurman’s comments suggest Apple is still cautious, and the discussions may not result in large-scale production anytime soon. But even exploratory talks highlight how critical chip manufacturing capacity has become as AI demand continues reshaping the semiconductor industry.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Vibe coding has taken the development world by storm—and it truly is a modern marvel to behold. The problem is, the vibe coding rush is going to leave a lot of apps broken in its wake once people move on to the next craze. At the end of the day, many of us are going to be left with apps that are broken with no fixes in sight.

A lot of vibe “coders” are really just prompt typers

And they’ve never touched a line of code

An AI robot using a computer with a prompt field on the screen. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

Vibe coding made development available to the masses like never before. You can simply take an AI tool, type a prompt into a text box, and out pops an app. It probably needs some refinement, but, typically, version one is still functional whenever you’re vibe coding.

The problem comes from “developers” who have never written a line of code. They’re just using vibe coding because it’s cool or they think they can make a quick buck, but they really have no knowledge of development—or any desire to learn proper development.

Think of those types of vibe coders as people who realize they can use a calculator and online tools to solve math problems for them, so they try to build a rocket. They might be able to make something work in some way, but they’ll never reach the moon, even though they think they can.

Anyone can vibe code a prototype

But you really need to know what you’re doing to build for the long haul

For those who don’t know what they’re doing, vibe coding is a fantastic way to build a prototype. I’ve vibe coded several projects so far, and out of everything I’ve done, I’ve realized one thing—vibe coding is only as good as the person behind the keyboard. I have spent more time debugging the fruits of my vibe coding than I have actually vibe coding.

Each project that I’ve built with vibe coding could have easily been “viable” within an hour or two, sometimes even less time than that. But, to make something of actual quality, it has always taken many, many hours.

Vibe coding is definitely faster than traditional coding if you’re a one-man team, but it’s not something that is fast by any means if you’re after a quality product. The same goes for continued updates.

I’ve spent the better part of three months building a weather app for iPhone. It’s a simple app, but it also has quite a lot of complex things going on in the background.

It recently got released in the App Store—no small feat at all. But, I still get a few crash reports a week, and I’m constantly squashing bugs and working on new features for the app. This is because I’m planning on supporting the app for a long time, not just the weekend I released it, and that takes a lot more work.

Vibe coders often jump from app to app without thinking of longevity

The app was a weekend project, after all

A relaxed man lounging on an orange beanbag watches as a friendly yellow robot works on a laptop for him, while multiple red exclamation-mark warning icons float around them. Credit: Lucas Gouveia/How-To Geek | ViDI Studio/Shutterstock

I’ve seen it far too often, a vibe coder touting that they built this “complex app” in 48 hours, as if that is something to be celebrated. Sure, it’s cool that a working version of an app was up and running in two days, but how well does it work? How many bugs are still in it? Are there race conditions that cause a random crash?

My weather app has a weird race condition right now I’m tracking down. It crashes, on occasion, when opened from Spotlight on an iPhone. Not every time does that cause a crash, just sometimes.

If a vibe coder’s only goal is to build apps in short amounts of time so they can brag about how fast they built the app, they likely aren’t going to take the time to fix little things like that.

I don’t vibe code my apps that way, and I know many other vibe coders that aren’t that way—but we all started with actual coding, not typing a prompt.


Anyone can be a vibe coder, but not all vibe coders are developers

“And when everyone’s super… no one will be.” – Syndrome, The Incredibles. It might be from a kids’ movie, but it rings true in the era of vibe coding. When everyone thinks they can build an app in a weekend, everyone thinks they’re a developer.

By contrast, not every vibe coder is actually a developer, and that’s the problem. It’s hard to know if the app you’re using was built by someone who has plans to support the app long-term or not—and that’s why there’s going to be a lot of broken apps in the future.

I can see it now, the apps that people built in a weekend as a challenge will simply go without updates. While the app might work for the first few weeks or months just fine, an API update comes along and breaks the app’s compatibility. It’s at that point we’ll see who was vibe coding to build an app versus who was vibe coding just for online clout—and the sad part is, consumers will lose out more often than not with broken apps.



Source link