Stop babying your phone for a resale value that will never come


How much do you think about the resale value of your smartphone? I know that for some people, this is something they are a little obsessed about. After all, you just paid hundreds or even thousands for a new phone, and you want it to stay in perfect condition until the day you’re done with it.

To that end, people pack their phones with screen protectors and thick ugly cases. Hiding all the goodness they spent that money to get in the first place. But, if you look at the whole concept of resale value in a phone, I think whatever logic there might have been behind this obsession just doesn’t hold water anymore. If it ever did.

Resale value is a myth most people will never cash in on

It’s a promise that’s rarely fulfilled

A phone has a smashed screen on a white background. Credit: Mr.Digital/Shutterstock.com

How much resale value matters is often a function of how quickly you get rid of your phone for a new one. If you’re on a two-year phone replacement cycle, then you can probably still get a decent amount of money back on the used market.

However, phones are becoming useful for much longer. There’s less incentive to upgrade them that quickly. So the value of your phone is shifted to the actual use that you get out of it. If a modern smartphone will do the job up to the point where it’s resale value is zero, then its resale value is irrelevant.

If you only plan on replacing your phone when you need to rather than want to, then don’t worry about resale value. Just use it and enjoy it.

s26 ultra product image

SoC

Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Display

6.9-inch Dynamic Super AMOLED 2X

Get the new Galaxy S26 Ultra with AI smarts and an all-new privacy display. It’s big, powerful, packed with AI, and you’ll love the S-Pen stylus. 


Depreciation is brutal no matter what you buy

A phone is not an investment

A person handing over a large stack of cash. Credit: Andy Dean Photography/Shutterstock.com

If you thought the depreciation on a new car was bad, wait until you try to sell a flagship phone two years after you bought it! Things are only worth what people are willing to pay for them, and in my experience, even putting up a flagship phone in pristine condition for 50% of its launch price will only get you dozens of extreme lowball offers.

This is why so many of my phones over the years have simply been passed on to family members, or I just kept them as a backup in case my current phone dies, is stolen or breaks.

You certainly feel depreciation the most for more expensive phones, but it affects any phone at every price bracket. For mid-range or entry-level phones, what you’d get reselling it might not even be worth the time you need to spend facilitating that sale. It might make more sense to trade it in, if there’s a trade-in program for your handset. Sure, trade-in offers for store credit are still a ripoff, but at least it’s time-efficient, and you don’t have to do the deal from your trunk in an empty parking lot.

Optimizing for resale makes your experience worse

Who are you doing this for?

Just look at how nice these phones look naked.

Unless you have a real functional reason to do it, babying your phone and slathering it in safety equipment only makes your experience worse. So you have a phone with the very latest glass technology, tougher than anything ever before, no glare, no fingerprints, amazing popping color from the screen—and then you stick a $15 piece of tempered glass over it?

A thin titanium and glass body, or textured polycarb, slaved over by engineers to feel amazing in your hands? Nope. $10 silicone rubber is what you want. Because what if the next person to own this phone wants to pay you less because of slight wear and tear? Who will think of their needs?

Use your phone like you’ll never sell it (because you probably won’t)

Take the wrapping off your Ferrari seats

I think it’s healthier to think of your phone not in terms of what it will be worth if you decide to sell it one day, but in terms of how much value it can provide you while you are the one using it. You paid for that screen, you paid for that design and body, that’s your battery taking the hits. Why subsidize the needs of a stranger?

Now, if you are worried about accidents that result in repairs you can’t afford, that’s a perfectly legitimate reason to baby your phone or put a case on it. Personally, my smartphone is insured against theft or breakage, so if I accidentally drop it and smash the screen, I’m covered.

By the way, just because your phone is in a case doesn’t mean it won’t break when it drops, but my insurance covers the phone whether it’s in a case or not. Just saying.


Either way, I’m not advocating for anyone to be reckless, I just don’t want you to end up paying for the enjoyment of something and then never actually getting the enjoyment you paid for. That’s way worse than getting a little less money for your phone one day.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link