Anthropic is in talks with Samsung to manufacture a custom AI chip



TL;DR

Anthropic is discussing a custom AI chip with Samsung, though the project is early-stage and no design has been finalized.

Anthropic is in talks with Samsung Electronics to explore manufacturing a custom AI chip, The Information reported on Thursday. The project remains at an early stage, and Anthropic has not yet decided what the chip would be used for, how powerful it would be, or how it would fit into a server, according to the report. The company could still abandon the effort entirely.

When asked for comment, Anthropic told TechCrunch that a diversified hardware stack including chips from Google, Amazon, and Nvidia will continue to be central to its compute strategy, and said it had nothing further to add on the Samsung discussions. Samsung already plays a significant role in the AI chip supply chain as a major manufacturing partner for Nvidia, producing chips that power AI training and inference workloads. The two companies are also building an AI chip factory together in South Korea.

The talks follow a Reuters report in April that Anthropic was exploring the idea of building its own chips as Claude’s compute demands outpaced available supply. At the time, the effort was described as preliminary, with no dedicated team assembled and no commitment to a specific design. What has changed since April is that Anthropic has hired Clive Chan, who previously helped build OpenAI’s custom chip programme, a signal that the company is moving from exploration to active development.

The timing also coincides with a move by Anthropic’s main competitor. Last week, OpenAI unveiled its first custom chip, a Broadcom-built inference processor it calls the “Intelligence Processor,” designed to reduce the company’s dependence on Nvidia hardware. Amazon and Google both already offer their own custom silicon through their cloud platforms, and Anthropic currently runs Claude across all three chip families.

Anthropic’s annualized revenue run rate surpassed 30 billion dollars earlier this year, more than tripling from roughly nine billion dollars at the end of 2025, a growth rate that makes the economics of custom silicon increasingly attractive. The company signed a long-term deal with Google and Broadcom in April for roughly three and a half gigawatts of TPU compute starting in 2027, but designing its own chips would give it an additional layer of control over the hardware that runs its models. Whether Samsung or another manufacturer ultimately builds a chip for Anthropic remains an open question, but the direction of travel across the industry, away from total reliance on Nvidia, is now unmistakable.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


I reluctantly upgraded from my Pixel 4a in late 2024, which means I spent four years clinging to a phone that still felt like a phone. Part of that was the size. The Pixel 4a was small enough to use without performing thumb yoga, a disappearing luxury now that flagships have settled into pocket-tablet territory. That’s an argument for another day.

The uglier issue is what happened after I moved on. In January 2025, Google pushed an automatic Android 13 update to Pixel 4a phones. Google’s own support page says the update reduced available battery capacity and affected charging performance on some impacted devices. Reddit users were less polite. One r/Pixel4a post said the battery suddenly had “around 40% of its former capacity” after the patch.

For poor ol’ 4a, that was basically the death knell.

When an update becomes the problem

A dying battery is normal. A four-year-old phone needing service isn’t exactly a scandal. Batteries age, screens fail, ports loosen, and gravity remains undefeated.

This felt different. The phone didn’t simply get old in someone’s pocket. Its usable life changed after a company-controlled patch, and the owner was left to deal with the result. The Verge reported that the update was tied to overheating-risk mitigation and reduced charging capacity by more than 50% on affected units. Battery safety is real. It still doesn’t erase the experience of waking up to a phone that suddenly can’t survive the day.

That’s what update death looks like. Software doesn’t just support aging hardware anymore. It can also decide when that hardware becomes miserable to keep using.

When every patch feels haunted

My wife, who’s rocking an S24 Ultra, has a different version of the same dread. She keeps running into Reddit threads about Samsung Galaxy phones and the dreaded green line, that bright vertical scar that makes a screen look like it has been reassigned to a cyberpunk prop department. One r/S23 user wrote that a green line appeared on a carefully maintained phone after about a year and a half, then said Samsung service quoted a screen replacement because the warranty was over. Another Samsung Community post claimed a green-line issue appeared after an August update, with the display allegedly working perfectly before it.

Reddit isn’t a forensic lab with avatars. A green line can come from boring hardware failure, not corporate villainy with a release calendar. Still, the anxiety is real. People don’t only worry that an update will move a button or ruin a camera setting. They worry it might be the thing that nudges a working device from “old” to “not worth repairing.”

Modern gadgets are never fully handed over. They keep phoning home. They keep asking for patches. They keep depending on decisions made long after the receipt has faded. Ownership now comes with a quiet asterisk.

The graveyard got software updates

Planned obsolescence used to sound like tinfoil-hat consumer paranoia, which was convenient for everyone selling the new thing. Then regulators started writing it down in boring official language. In 2018, Italy’s competition authority fined Samsung and Apple after finding that software and firmware updates caused serious malfunctions, reduced performance, and sped up replacement of older phones. Samsung was fined €5 million, while Apple was fined €10 million.

Apple’s battery-throttling mess made the suspicion harder to laugh off. In the US, Apple agreed to a settlement of up to $500 million over claims that it slowed older iPhones, while a separate multistate settlement required Apple to pay $113 million over alleged misrepresentations around iPhone batteries and performance throttling. Consumers weren’t hallucinating the pattern. The receipts were scattered across court filings, regulatory decisions, and phones that suddenly felt older than they had the day before.

Europe seems less willing to accept “trust us” as a product-lifetime policy. New EU rules for smartphones and tablets started applying on June 20, 2025, covering durability, repairability, battery life, and software updates. New labels put some of that lifespan math in front of shoppers before checkout.

The post-warranty graveyard used to be easy to recognize: cracked screens, swollen batteries, and charging ports full of pocket lint. Now the graveyard has paperwork, compatibility warnings, and software that slowly stops cooperating. The gadget can still turn on. It can still look fine on a desk. Then one day the company changes what “usable” means, and the thing you paid for starts practicing being trash.



Source link