Amazon-backed nuclear startup X-Energy raises $1.02 billion in IPO


X-Energy sold 44.3 million Class A shares at $23 each, above the $16–$19 marketed range, and began trading on Nasdaq under the ticker XE on 24 April. The company has $1.8 billion in prior private capital, a $500 million Amazon-led Series C-1, and a binding commitment from Amazon to buy up to 5 gigawatts of nuclear power by 2039.


X-Energy, the Rockville, Maryland-based small modular reactor developer backed by Amazon, raised $1.02 billion in its initial public offering on 23 April 2026, pricing its upsized offering at $23 per share, 21% above the top of its marketed range of $16 to $19. \

The company sold 44.3 million Class A shares and began trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker XE on 24 April.

The IPO is the largest public market debut by an advanced nuclear company to date and arrives at a moment when electricity demand from AI data centres, manufacturing reshoring, and electrification has made reliable, carbon-free baseload power one of the most commercially urgent infrastructure problems in the United States.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The pricing tells its own story. X-Energy launched its investor roadshow with a target range of $16 to $19, implying gross proceeds of up to $814 million.

The final price of $23 represents a 21% premium above the top of that range and total proceeds of $1.02 billion, a figure that required an upsized offering, more shares sold than originally planned. ARK Investment Management, Cathie Wood’s thematic fund, indicated interest in purchasing up to $105 million worth of shares at the IPO price.

The oversubscription and above-range pricing reflect investor conviction in the nuclear renaissance narrative, which has been building momentum since major technology companies began making long-dated nuclear power purchase agreements.

Amazon’s role in X-Energy’s story is central. The company led X-Energy’s $500 million Series C-1 round and has pledged to purchase up to 5 gigawatts of nuclear power from the company by 2039, a commitment that functions as both a revenue anchor and a validation signal for the underlying technology.

For context, 5 gigawatts is roughly the output of five large conventional nuclear power plants, or approximately equivalent to the electricity demand of a mid-sized American city.

Amazon’s nuclear bet is driven by the arithmetic of AI: its data centres require enormous, predictable quantities of electricity that renewable sources, absent storage, cannot provide around the clock.

Nuclear power, specifically the small modular reactors that X-Energy is developing, offers carbon-free baseload generation in a physically compact footprint.

X-Energy’s core technology is the Xe-100, a pebble bed modular reactor design that the company has been developing since its founding in 2009 by Kamal Ghaffarian. The Xe-100 is designed to produce approximately 80 megawatts of thermal power per unit, with four units typically deployed together as a 320 MW plant.

The pebble bed design uses uranium-coated fuel spheres rather than conventional fuel rods, which the company says provides inherent safety properties: the reaction slows down naturally if the reactor overheats, without requiring active cooling intervention.

The NRC has been engaged in pre-application review of the Xe-100 design. X-Energy also manufactures advanced nuclear fuel, a vertically integrated capability that reduces supply chain dependency.

The IPO crowns a private capital raise of more than $1.8 billion, according to PitchBook, across multiple rounds that included strategic investors alongside Amazon.

Founder and chairman Kamal Ghaffarian retains control of 61% of the Class B shares of the combined company, giving him voting control despite the public float. Ares Management Corp holds a significant stake.

The proceeds of the IPO will be used to accelerate reactor development, scale up fuel fabrication capacity, and fund the commercialisation of the Xe-100 towards its first deployment, which X-Energy has targeted for the early 2030s.

The broader context is the most significant element. X-Energy’s IPO is not an isolated event. Microsoft has agreed to restart Unit 1 of Three Mile Island with Constellation Energy to supply its data centres. Google has signed agreements with Kairos Power for SMR capacity.

Meta and Oracle have also made nuclear power commitments. The pattern is consistent: hyperscalers with rapidly growing AI compute footprints are making long-dated, utility-scale power purchase agreements with nuclear developers because no other technology can reliably deliver carbon-free baseload electricity at the scale and predictability that AI infrastructure requires.

Vikram Bagri, an analyst who published a client note on 17 April, said the IPO launch “suggests continued appetite among investors for small modular reactors,”, which is, on the evidence of a $1.02 billion above-range debut, something of an understatement.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link