After using the $1,900 Motorola Razr Fold again, I’m doubling down on my buying advice


Motorola Razr Fold

Cesar Cadenas/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


Just months ago, at MWC, Motorola let journalists like me go hands-on with the upcoming Razr Fold — and again at the Razr launch event in Los Angeles this week. Only this time, the company revealed everything to me, and it’s put everything into perspective.

I got a few more details about the US price tag (which is still pretty high), preorder and shipping dates, and a few other new and interesting features of the Razr Fold. Overall, my impressions went from mostly positive to cautiously optimistic, given this new information. But there are still some questions to be answered.

What’s new with the Razr Fold

For starters, the outside screen is a 6.6-inch pOLED screen with Gorilla Glass Ceramic 3. The inner screen will be a massive 8.1 inches, making it the largest in North America. It will run on the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 processor and come with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage. 

The cameras will be the same ones seen in the Motorola Signature — 50-megapixel sensors across the ultrawide, main, and 3x optical zoom. With the exception of the processor, those are exceptional specifications across the board. Actual performance and camera quality will have to wait until I get a full review of the device, but Motorola showed us its super-res zoom capability.

Also: I’ve tested every Razr and Galaxy Flip: 3 reasons Motorola crushes Samsung at foldables

This is similar to other phones that have this capability. Basically, you can snap a shot with the telephoto camera up to 100x, and once you open the image in the gallery, post-processing kicks in. The result is a fairly sharp photograph of something incredibly far away, but that comes with a caveat. 

Motorola Razr Fold at CES 2026

Kerry Wan/ZDNET

First, I don’t have a sample to show you (yet) because I demoed this feature with preproduction units (and they didn’t give us a copy). Also, I haven’t had a chance to view the photo on a screen larger than the Razr Fold’s. So, while the photo might be good enough for social media, how it holds up under pixel-peeping scrutiny will have to wait for our full review, coming in a few weeks.

Motorola also introduced a FIFA edition of the Motorola Razr Fold, which complements the FIFA edition flip from CES. It’s a huge partnership with the most popular sport in the world in a year where the world will play for a title. All of that is extremely well played.

The $2,000 elephant in the room

European pricing was announced back in March of 2026 at €1,999 (roughly $2,320, excluding region-based adjustments). In the US, the Fold checks in at $1,900, which still feels high, even if the Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 and Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold both live in that same neighborhood. 

In Europe, the €1,999 price includes the €100 Moto Stylus Ultra. The Pen Ultra is a nifty little device that, sadly, does not silo in the phone itself, but it comes with its own carrying case. It’s an active stylus with some cool features on its own, such as pressure sensitivity, a quick-action button, and a smart menu of options on demand. In the US, the $1,900 price does not include the stylus, which is fair enough.

Also: I tried Tecno’s modular phone that’s got the internet buzzing – and it got weird quickly

Overall, while the processor leaves something to be desired (and really not that much), there are otherwise a lot of firsts in the phone, including the first triple 50-megapixel camera set on a North American foldable, the biggest and brightest screen, and the biggest battery. That is a 6,000 mAh silicon-carbon battery in there, and it’s capable of up to 80W of fast charging, which matches OnePlus’s 2023 (and only) foldable, the OnePlus Open.

Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7

The Motorola Razr Fold (left) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (right).

Kerry Wan/ZDNET

The phone is a tad thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, and has a battery that is over 40% larger and charges faster. This phone is no slouch. It’s a strong contender to be my daily carry when I hit trade shows from now on, espeically is the cameras hold up as well as promised.

Third, this phone will likely have a very balanced, all-around great camera experience. Yes, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has a 200-megapixel main sensor, but after that, things fall off pretty quickly. Meanwhile, the three 50-megapixel cameras should give a more consistent all-around experience.

Also: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7: I tried both, and there’s a clear winner

One last note we learned about on the Razr Fold (and the flip Razrs as well), all four phones will support video wallpapers on the cover screens and the inside as well. While it’s easy to write that off as a gimmick, I tested it out in April, and it’s actually a pretty fun feature. 

The two limitations are that 4K videos won’t work and that videos must be in portrait orientation. That seems odd, because for both the open Fold and the closed Razrs, the screen is square, so it shouldn’t matter. We’ll run with it.

My buying advice (for now)

While I was initially very excited to check out a fresh competitor in the large-screen foldable market, I’m a little less enthused, now that the Razr Fold’s full specs and pricing has been revealed.

But there’s one indisputable fact to consider, which gives me hope. This is a Motorola phone, and the company’s M.O. has long been to launch a phone at a high price and put it on a permanent sale a few weeks later. For example, the new Razr Fold has a retail price of $1,900 but will likely see aggressive discounts during major sales events like Prime Day and Black Friday. I expect a similar trend with the other Razr phones Motorola is launching soon.

So, if you don’t want to fork out almost two grand, the best buying opportunity may come in only a matter of months — possibly weeks.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Vibe coding has taken the development world by storm—and it truly is a modern marvel to behold. The problem is, the vibe coding rush is going to leave a lot of apps broken in its wake once people move on to the next craze. At the end of the day, many of us are going to be left with apps that are broken with no fixes in sight.

A lot of vibe “coders” are really just prompt typers

And they’ve never touched a line of code

An AI robot using a computer with a prompt field on the screen. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

Vibe coding made development available to the masses like never before. You can simply take an AI tool, type a prompt into a text box, and out pops an app. It probably needs some refinement, but, typically, version one is still functional whenever you’re vibe coding.

The problem comes from “developers” who have never written a line of code. They’re just using vibe coding because it’s cool or they think they can make a quick buck, but they really have no knowledge of development—or any desire to learn proper development.

Think of those types of vibe coders as people who realize they can use a calculator and online tools to solve math problems for them, so they try to build a rocket. They might be able to make something work in some way, but they’ll never reach the moon, even though they think they can.

Anyone can vibe code a prototype

But you really need to know what you’re doing to build for the long haul

For those who don’t know what they’re doing, vibe coding is a fantastic way to build a prototype. I’ve vibe coded several projects so far, and out of everything I’ve done, I’ve realized one thing—vibe coding is only as good as the person behind the keyboard. I have spent more time debugging the fruits of my vibe coding than I have actually vibe coding.

Each project that I’ve built with vibe coding could have easily been “viable” within an hour or two, sometimes even less time than that. But, to make something of actual quality, it has always taken many, many hours.

Vibe coding is definitely faster than traditional coding if you’re a one-man team, but it’s not something that is fast by any means if you’re after a quality product. The same goes for continued updates.

I’ve spent the better part of three months building a weather app for iPhone. It’s a simple app, but it also has quite a lot of complex things going on in the background.

It recently got released in the App Store—no small feat at all. But, I still get a few crash reports a week, and I’m constantly squashing bugs and working on new features for the app. This is because I’m planning on supporting the app for a long time, not just the weekend I released it, and that takes a lot more work.

Vibe coders often jump from app to app without thinking of longevity

The app was a weekend project, after all

A relaxed man lounging on an orange beanbag watches as a friendly yellow robot works on a laptop for him, while multiple red exclamation-mark warning icons float around them. Credit: Lucas Gouveia/How-To Geek | ViDI Studio/Shutterstock

I’ve seen it far too often, a vibe coder touting that they built this “complex app” in 48 hours, as if that is something to be celebrated. Sure, it’s cool that a working version of an app was up and running in two days, but how well does it work? How many bugs are still in it? Are there race conditions that cause a random crash?

My weather app has a weird race condition right now I’m tracking down. It crashes, on occasion, when opened from Spotlight on an iPhone. Not every time does that cause a crash, just sometimes.

If a vibe coder’s only goal is to build apps in short amounts of time so they can brag about how fast they built the app, they likely aren’t going to take the time to fix little things like that.

I don’t vibe code my apps that way, and I know many other vibe coders that aren’t that way—but we all started with actual coding, not typing a prompt.


Anyone can be a vibe coder, but not all vibe coders are developers

“And when everyone’s super… no one will be.” – Syndrome, The Incredibles. It might be from a kids’ movie, but it rings true in the era of vibe coding. When everyone thinks they can build an app in a weekend, everyone thinks they’re a developer.

By contrast, not every vibe coder is actually a developer, and that’s the problem. It’s hard to know if the app you’re using was built by someone who has plans to support the app long-term or not—and that’s why there’s going to be a lot of broken apps in the future.

I can see it now, the apps that people built in a weekend as a challenge will simply go without updates. While the app might work for the first few weeks or months just fine, an API update comes along and breaks the app’s compatibility. It’s at that point we’ll see who was vibe coding to build an app versus who was vibe coding just for online clout—and the sad part is, consumers will lose out more often than not with broken apps.



Source link