A Czech AI startup says it can detect drones by sound for €150 per sensor, and it wants to wire up power grids first



TL;DR

Czech startup Neuron Soundware built Sound Shield, an AI acoustic drone detection system using €100-150 sensors that consume 1W each.

Czech startup Neuron Soundware has built an AI-powered acoustic detection system called Sound Shield that identifies drones by the sound of their engines using microphone sensors that cost between €100 and €150 each. The system is designed as a passive, low-cost alternative to radar for detecting low-flying drones over cities, infrastructure, and military installations. The company, which has spent the past decade using AI to listen to industrial machinery for clients including Airbus, Siemens, and BMW, is now applying the same acoustic analysis technology to airspace defence.

Sound Shield works by deploying small sensors called nEdge Minis, each consuming just 1 watt of power, that listen continuously for drone engine signatures. The sensors report to a computing platform powered by Nvidia’s Jetson modules, which runs neural networks on-device to match incoming audio against a library of known drone acoustic profiles. When the system detects a threat, it alerts a centralised command platform with the drone’s estimated speed, altitude, and direction of movement.

The approach exploits a fundamental limitation of drone design. Radar-absorbing coatings and stealth shaping can make a drone nearly invisible to traditional detection systems, but no current technology can silence the mechanical noise of rotors and engines. Every drone produces a distinct acoustic signature that, according to Neuron Soundware, its AI can identify in real time across multiple sensor positions.

Pavel Konečný, founder and CEO of Neuron Soundware, is pitching Sound Shield as a dual-use system that would first be deployed on electrical transformer stations. “Primarily, they can continuously monitor the health of the transformer itself and other critical components of the distribution network, detecting internal discharges, oil leaks, or other operational anomalies,” Konečný said. “At the same time, their microphones listen to the sky.

The dual-use angle is commercially significant. Rather than asking governments to fund a standalone drone detection network from scratch, Neuron Soundware is proposing to piggyback on infrastructure that already needs acoustic monitoring. The company argues this would reduce the number of sensors required and give governments a comprehensive air defence layer with minimal additional installation and power costs.

European governments are scrambling for affordable drone detection after the wars in Ukraine and Iran demonstrated how cheap UAVs can destroy billions of dollars in military hardware. Ukraine’s Operation Spiderweb in June 2025 used $2,000 drones to destroy an estimated $7 billion worth of Russian strategic bombers, according to Ukrainian officials, though Russia claimed far lower losses. The asymmetry between drone cost and the damage they inflict has made counter-drone systems one of the fastest-growing segments of defence procurement.

The counter-drone market is expected to more than triple from roughly $6.6 billion in 2025 to $20 billion by 2030. Startups across Europe are raising capital to build sovereign counter-drone capabilities, and NATO members along Russia’s border have agreed to construct a drone detection wall stretching from Norway to Poland. Sound Shield positions itself as a complementary layer to radar and radio-frequency detection rather than a replacement.

The economic case is straightforward. Modern radar systems capable of detecting small drones cost orders of magnitude more than a network of nEdge Minis, and they actively broadcast their position every time they sweep. Sound Shield’s sensors are passive, meaning they emit no signal that an adversary could detect or jam.

The trade-off is range and reliability.

Acoustic drone detection has well-documented limitations that the source material does not address. Most acoustic systems are effective to roughly 300-500 metres under favourable conditions, with performance degrading substantially in wind, rain, or noisy urban environments. Ambient noise from traffic, wildlife, and industrial equipment can produce false positives.

Newer drone models are also being designed with quieter motors that reduce the acoustic signature available for detection. Neuron Soundware claims its nEdge PRO computing module can aggregate data from sensors within a 20-kilometre radius, but independent testing of that range claim has not been published.

The company has raised approximately €7.4 million to date from investors including Inven Capital, J&T Ventures, and Lead Ventures, and received €7 million from the European Innovation Council. It has more than 130 industrial installations across four continents monitoring machines acoustically. Whether the jump from listening to pumps and turbines to tracking hostile drones in contested airspace is as transferable as the company suggests remains to be proven in real-world conditions.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


1,000W, 10-port charger for $45... predictably disappointing.

1,000W, 10-port charger for $45… predictably disappointing. 

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Things that look “too good to be true” invariable are just that.
  • This example got dangerously hot in a short period of time before dying. 
  • There’s no legitimate charger that comes close to delivering on the 1,000W promise.

Being a tech reviewer for a living means that I get offered some very interesting things. Not interesting as in Bugatti supercars or jewel-encrusted Fabergé eggs, but interesting as in “this thing could easily be a fire hazard — want to take a look?”

Also: The best GaN chargers of 2026: Expert tested

Submissively, I often say yes. And I’m glad I did with the most recent pitch, because it was very interesting indeed.

Meet the “interesting” charger

This time around, the thing of interest was a charger that claimed to deliver an incredible 1,000W through its ten ports — four 140W USB-C ports, four 100W USB-C ports, and two 20W USB-A ports. 

The person who bought this charger told me that they’d plugged it in, used it to charge their phone for “a few minutes,” got worried when it became “a little hot,” and unplugged it.

That's a lot of promise... but (spoilers), they don't deliver!

That’s a lot of promise… but (spoilers), they don’t deliver!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The unit was suspiciously light and plasticky, especially given its built-in power supply. Compare this to Ugreen’s Nexode 500W charger, which weighs a hair under 5 lb.

There was also a slight whiff of melty plastic, which made me think that this had been a bit more than a little hot. 

Also: This $4 router reboot timer is the cheap internet fix I didn’t know I needed – and it works reliably

Color me suspicious, but I had a gut feeling that the only way this charger would be able to push out 1,000W would be if it caught fire. 

Turns out I wasn’t far wrong.

How long would it last? Answer: Minutes

Talk is cheap. It was time to test the charger. 

So I plugged it in, turned it on, and started using it. Within a couple of minutes of starting to use it, I noticed a few things:

  • No matter what I tried, I couldn’t persuade the charger to deliver more than about 60W from any of the ports. 
  • As for peak output, I managed to get close to 250W.
  • The power output was very uneven and noisy, fluctuating wildly. The more ports I used, the worse it got.
  • The unit got very hot to the touch very quickly, even under light loads. 
  • But… before I could get the thermal camera out to check how hot it got, there was a pop and the unmistakable smell of “Magic Smoke.” The charger had been sent to Silicon Heaven within minutes.

Annnnd… POP! This is the moment the charger gave up the ghost.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Diagnosis time

Time to take it apart and have a look inside. For an item that plugged into the mains power, this unit was shockingly easy to take apart. 

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

And even unplugged and broken, it was capable of delivering zaps! If the case came off while this was plugged into an outlet, it could very easily be deadly.

There’s charge still in some of the capacitors, and these could deliver quite a zap despite the unit being broken and unplugged!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

After getting inside, the unit was filled with a grey goo that I’d seen in a previous disappointing charger I’d taken apart. This is a thermal paste that’s used to try to dissipate the heat generated by the components. 

It’s not really going to work because it’s sealed in a plastic box with no effective heatsink. It’s a token gesture at best. At worst, it creates a mass that’ll slowly heat up and hold temperature because it’s got no way to get rid of it.

Behold the grey goo!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Next to this goo was a bank of capacitors — the black cylinders in the photo — which were the cause of the failure. They’d clearly overheated, with three of them showing signs of bulging.

The problem!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Well there’s the problem!

I also noticed that two of the components — bridge rectifiers that are used to turn AC mains into DC — have been fixed on an angle to make the touch a metal heatsink. It’s not really an effective way to cool down components.

The bottom line

Another “too good to be true” device bites the dust. It’s not the first one I’ve come across, and it won’t be the last.

Moral of the story here is that manufactures are using big number marketing — in this case 1,000W and masses of ports — to scalewash poor quality products. 

This might be a half-decent product if it was built to deliver 100W, but there’s no end of competition at that end of the market. Silkscreen “1,000W” on the outside, sprinkle in a few reviews that feel scripted and fake, and all of a sudden it’s interesting and exciting… right up until it blows up. 

Also: My top 7 laptop-bag essentials now, after decades of remote work

I know of no 1,000W charger. In fact, the 500W Ugreen Nexode is the highest-power charger that I’ve tested that’s legit. And the price is also legit — $250. 

But it’s built to deliver on what it promises and is packed with safety features, including “tip-over protection,” which cuts the output when the unit tips over and prevents it from falling on its side, where it can’t dissipate heat effectively. Now that’s an attention to safety that I like to see in a product that handles that much power. 

But if you want 1,000W of output, you’ll have to buy two and duct tape them together.





Source link