Meta accused of violating DSA by failing to safeguard minors


Meta accused of violating DSA by failing to safeguard minors

Pierluigi Paganini
April 30, 2026

The European Commission accuses Meta of failing to protect children, allowing users under 13 on Instagram and Facebook, in breach of the DSA rules.

The European Commission has accused Meta of violating child safety rules. Instagram and Facebook allegedly failed to prevent children under 13 from accessing their platforms. According to the Commission, Meta did not properly assess and mitigate risks to minors, breaching obligations under the Digital Services Act (DSA).

“The European Commission has preliminarily found Meta’s Instagram and Facebook in breach of the Digital Services Act (DSA) for failing to diligently identify, assess and mitigate the risks of minors under 13 years old accessing their services.” reads the press release. “Despite Meta’s own terms and conditions setting the minimum age to access Instagram and Facebook safely at 13, the measures put in place by the company to enforce these restrictions do not seem to be effective. The measures do not adequately prevent minors under the age of 13 from accessing their services nor promptly identify and remove them, if they already gained access.”

Minors under 13 can easily bypass age rules on Instagram and Facebook by entering false birth dates, as Meta lacks effective verification checks. Reporting tools are also weak: they require multiple steps, are not user-friendly, and often fail to trigger proper action, allowing underage users to remain active. The European Commission says Meta’s risk assessment is incomplete and ignores evidence that 10–12% of under-13s use these platforms, as well as research showing younger children are more vulnerable to harm. As a result, Meta is urged to revise its risk evaluation methods and strengthen measures to detect, prevent, and remove underage users, ensuring better privacy, safety, and protection for minors.

“At this stage, the Commission considers that Instagram and Facebook must change their risk assessment methodology, in order to evaluate which risks arise on Instagram and Facebook in the European Union, and how they manifest.” continues the press release. “Moreover, Instagram and Facebook need to strengthen their measures to prevent, detect and remove minors under the age of 13 from their service.”

Instagram and Facebook can now review the Commission’s evidence and respond to the preliminary findings, while also taking steps to address the issues under the 2025 DSA Guidelines. The European Board for Digital Services will be consulted. If breaches are confirmed, Meta could face fines of up to 6% of its global annual turnover, along with periodic penalties to enforce compliance. These findings are not final.

The case stems from formal proceedings launched in May 2024, based on extensive analysis of internal data, risk reports, and input from experts and civil society. The Commission used DSA guidelines as a benchmark, stressing the need for effective age verification tools that are accurate, reliable, and privacy-friendly, and has proposed an EU age verification app as a reference model.

“The Commission continues its investigation into other potential breaches that are part of these ongoing proceedings, including Meta’s compliance with DSA obligations to protect minors and the physical and mental well-being of users of all ages.” concludes the press release. “This investigation covers also the assessment and mitigation of risks arising from the design of Facebook’s and Instagram’s online interfaces, which may exploit the vulnerabilities and inexperience of minors, leading to addictive behaviour and reinforcing the so-called ‘rabbit hole’ effects.”

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, European Commission)







Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Apple’s Hide My Email feature has always been a pretty good quality-of-life privacy tool. iCloud+ subscribers can access randomly generated email addresses that forward messages to their real inbox. This helps users avoid any apps or websites from seeing their actual address. Apple also states that it doesn’t read the forwarded messages either.

All of this makes it quite a handy tool that genuinely cuts down on spam, creating a distance between you and whatever sketchy service wants your email.

But what it apparently does not do is hide your identity from law enforcement.

What’s going on?

According to court documents seen by TechCrunch, Apple provided federal agents with the real identities of at least two customers who had used Hide My Email addresses. One case in particular had the FBI seek records in an investigation that involved an email allegedly threatening Alexis Wilkins, who has been publicly reported as the girlfriend of FBI director Kash Patel.

The affidavit cited in the report states that Apple identified the anonymized address as being associated with the target Apple account. The company even provided the account holder’s full name and email address, along with records of another 134 anonymized email accounts created through this privacy feature.

TechCrunch also says it reviewed a second search warrant tied to an investigation by Homeland Security, where Apple again provided information linking Hide My Email accounts back to a user.

Why does this concern you

Before anyone starts calling out Apple for breaching privacy, they should know the distinction between companies and official warrants. Hide My Email is designed to protect users from apps, websites, and marketers, not from legal requests.

Apple still stores customer data like names, addresses, billing details, and other unencrypted info, which can be handed over when authorities come knocking with the right paperwork. So an email is a weak point here. Most emails are still not end-to-end encrypted, which means it is fundamentally different from services like Signal, whose popularity has grown precisely because of their robust privacy model.



Source link