Europe’s Earlybird VC closes €360M Fund VIII



The Berlin firm, founded in 1997, has raised a new fund every three to four years through every market cycle. Fund VIII is oversubscribed, manages €2.5 billion across strategies, and bets heavily on AI infrastructure, foundation models, and deeptech.


Earlybird Venture Capital has closed its eighth early-stage fund at €360 million, the largest in the Berlin firm’s 29-year history, the company announced today.

The fund is oversubscribed and backed by a mix of large institutional investors and family offices, many of whom have backed Earlybird across multiple fund generations. Across all its investment strategies, including Earlybird Health, the firm now manages €2.5 billion in assets.

The close continues what Earlybird describes as a defining discipline: raising a new fund every three to four years, without exception, through bull markets and corrections alike.

Fund VII, raised in 2022 at €350 million amid a market downturn, was itself oversubscribed. Fund VIII is €10 million larger and arrives at a moment when European venture capital is once again accelerating, with the continent raising €66.2 billion in 2025, though still roughly 22% of the equivalent US figure.

Earlybird has structured its investment thesis around three areas: AI applications, software infrastructure and foundation models, and deeptech.

The firm has already deployed capital from Fund VIII into a cohort that includes Black Forest Labs, the German image generation startup that raised $300 million at a $3.25 billion valuation in December 2025; SpAItial AI, a 3D AI foundation model company; Sintra AI, a Lithuanian AI startup for SMBs; Arago, a photonic chip company focused on reducing AI energy consumption; Porters, a financial services back-office software company; and Rivia, a clinical trials data infrastructure business.

The thesis on where value accrues in the AI stack is articulated clearly by Partner Dr Andre Retterath, who leads Earlybird’s AI and infrastructure practice. In an interview with Tech.eu, he argued that the application layer is the most competitive and lowest-margin part of the stack.

“At the application layer, it has never been easier to build a product, you can spin something up over a weekend. The constraint has shifted from building to distribution. So while applications are noisy and highly competitive, infrastructure offers stronger moats.”

Foundation models, he said, tend to sit in the 30 to 50% gross margin range. Infrastructure and hardware, Nvidia being the reference case, running at 70 to 75%,  offer substantially higher margins and stronger defensibility.

Earlybird’s portfolio reflects that view: it has invested in companies building the physical, computational, and software infrastructure on which AI applications run, rather than the applications themselves.

Fund VIII also introduces what Earlybird is calling a ‘perpetual ownership model’ for the firm itself. Under this structure, Earlybird will always remain completely owned by its active partners.

There will be no external ownership, no partial sale to a strategic acquirer, and no dilution of the principle that the people building the firm are the ones who own and shape it.

The model is described as a deliberate response to a recurring question in venture: how do you build a firm that lasts beyond a founding partnership generation without selling it, merging it, or listing it?

The structural contrast with recent moves in European venture is implicit but pointed. General Catalyst merged with Berlin-based La Famiglia in 2023. Molten Ventures acquired Forward Partners. Several US firms have absorbed European teams.

Earlybird’s perpetual ownership model is a statement of independence: the firm intends to remain a European institution, controlled by its own partners, funded by the returns it generates. Jochen Küst, Earlybird’s CFO, has been appointed Operating Partner as part of this transition, taking on expanded responsibility for scaling internal processes and portfolio support alongside his existing finance role.

Alongside the ownership model, Earlybird has been building out what it calls its platform: the operational infrastructure through which it supports portfolio companies beyond capital.

This includes AI integration across sourcing and portfolio support, the firm uses AI tooling to surface investment opportunities earlier and operate with greater context across its portfolio, and the Catalyst programme, which brings founders, operators, and domain experts together around shared challenges.

The Catalyst programme and community-building efforts reflect a broader structural bet: that the most effective early-stage investors in the current environment are not just capital providers but genuine platform builders, offering distribution, introductions, and operational support that founders cannot easily replicate independently.

This is not a new idea in venture. Still, the specific combination of AI-augmented sourcing, a deeply networked European LP base, and a nearly three-decade track record of backing the same categories of company before they became obvious is what Earlybird is positioning as its distinctive edge.

The close of Fund VIII arrives at an inflection point for European venture capital. The European Investment Fund is raising a €15 billion fund of funds to unlock up to €80 billion in scale-up funding, and France, Germany, and the European Commission all have major public capital programmes targeting early-stage technology.

The structural barriers that have historically constrained European VC, limited pension fund participation, fragmented member-state markets, conservative LP culture, are being addressed with public money but not yet reformed at source.

Against that backdrop, a €360 million oversubscribed close from a multi-decade independent firm backed by long-term institutional LPs is a different kind of signal. It demonstrates that European venture is capable of generating the LP confidence needed to raise at scale without government subsidy, based on returns alone.

Europe’s VCs have been criticised for moving too slowly and too cautiously in the AI era. Earlybird’s thesis, back deeply technical companies before the category is obvious, hold conviction through cycles, stay independent, is a direct rebuttal of that critique.

The Digital East split, which saw Earlybird’s CEE-focused arm rebrand and become independent in autumn 2024, has simplified the firm’s structure and sharpened its focus on Western Europe.

Fund VIII is the first full fund raised after that separation, and the increased size, relative to Fund VII, suggests LP appetite for the core Earlybird strategy is growing rather than contracting.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Apple’s Hide My Email feature has always been a pretty good quality-of-life privacy tool. iCloud+ subscribers can access randomly generated email addresses that forward messages to their real inbox. This helps users avoid any apps or websites from seeing their actual address. Apple also states that it doesn’t read the forwarded messages either.

All of this makes it quite a handy tool that genuinely cuts down on spam, creating a distance between you and whatever sketchy service wants your email.

But what it apparently does not do is hide your identity from law enforcement.

What’s going on?

According to court documents seen by TechCrunch, Apple provided federal agents with the real identities of at least two customers who had used Hide My Email addresses. One case in particular had the FBI seek records in an investigation that involved an email allegedly threatening Alexis Wilkins, who has been publicly reported as the girlfriend of FBI director Kash Patel.

The affidavit cited in the report states that Apple identified the anonymized address as being associated with the target Apple account. The company even provided the account holder’s full name and email address, along with records of another 134 anonymized email accounts created through this privacy feature.

TechCrunch also says it reviewed a second search warrant tied to an investigation by Homeland Security, where Apple again provided information linking Hide My Email accounts back to a user.

Why does this concern you

Before anyone starts calling out Apple for breaching privacy, they should know the distinction between companies and official warrants. Hide My Email is designed to protect users from apps, websites, and marketers, not from legal requests.

Apple still stores customer data like names, addresses, billing details, and other unencrypted info, which can be handed over when authorities come knocking with the right paperwork. So an email is a weak point here. Most emails are still not end-to-end encrypted, which means it is fundamentally different from services like Signal, whose popularity has grown precisely because of their robust privacy model.



Source link