I tested the 3 most popular Linux distros of April 2026, here’s how I rank them


The top three Linux distros on DistroWatch right now are CachyOS, Linux Mint, and MX Linux. I tested all three to understand what makes each one tick and who each one is really built for. One of them is for performance-obsessed users, one is for people tired of Windows, and one is quietly doing something most distros can’t. Here’s the full breakdown, and how I’d personally rank these three.

DistroWatch HPD page as of April 2026.

Defining “popular” is tricky when it comes to Linux. Unlike Windows or macOS, Linux distros don’t ship with telemetry, and there’s no central database tracking how many people are actually running any given distro. Nobody really knows the real numbers.

The closest thing we have is DistroWatch—a website that’s been cataloging and tracking Linux distros since 2001. It gets a lot of traffic from people in the Linux community looking up distros, reading release announcements, and comparing options. One of the metrics it tracks is HPD (hits per day)—basically how often people are landing on a particular distro’s page on the site.

While it doesn’t tell you how many people actually use a distro, it’s a decent proxy for what the community is paying attention to, and it’s been the go-to reference for this kind of thing for years. Based on DistroWatch’s April 2026 rankings, the top three are CachyOS, Linux Mint, and MX Linux—in that order. I tested all three, and at the end of this piece, I’ll give you my personal ranking.

CachyOS

Arch Linux + Performance gains – technical headaches = this distro

CachyOS is an Arch-based distro, and it’s been sitting at the top of DistroWatch’s popularity charts for over eighteen months now. That’s impressive because usually a distro pops up, grabs the #1 spot out of novelty, and then gets displaced by the regulars like Mint or Ubuntu. However, it’s clear that CachyOS is here to dominate and the reasons aren’t hard to see.

Firstly, it’s running KDE Plasma, which offers a familiar Windows-like experience that looks and feels more modern and customizable than Windows itself. The distro also comes with an optimized kernel—the CachyOS kernel—as well as many optimized packages to help you squeeze the most performance out of modern hardware—AMD Ryzen or Intel Haswell and later.

I tested CachyOS on my main PC running a Ryzen 5 5600G and Nvidia RTX 3060, and it genuinely felt snappier than most distros I’ve used, including Garuda Linux—my daily driver. This makes it an excellent distro for gamers. In fact, there’s a dedicated ISO for handheld gaming devices like the Steam Deck, Legion Go, and Legion Go S.

Steam Deck OLED Tag

Power Source

50Whr battery

What’s Included

Console, charger, carrying case

Brand

Valve

Screen

7.4-inch (diagonal) LCD display

Storage

512GB NVMe SSD

CPU

Zen 2 4c/8t, 2.4-3.5GHz

Elevate your gaming experience with the Steam Deck OLED. Immerse yourself in stunning visuals on the vibrant OLED display, while enjoying powerful performance and portability.


Furthermore, despite being an Arch-based distro, the developers have made it as beginner-friendly as possible. You get the CachyOS app, which gives you a graphical interface for routine maintenance. It also ships with Btrfs + Snapper for system snapshots, which ensures that if something breaks, you can just roll back to a previously working state from the GRUB menu.

The only downside I can think of is that since it’s a rolling release distro, you’ll need to update it regularly—at least once every two weeks. But the updates typically take less than 15 minutes, and if you’re okay with that, CachyOS can truly feel like the perfect distro.

You can download CachyOS from here.

CachyOS running Steam, Heroic Games Launcher, and the CachyOS Hello app.


Why This Distro Is More Popular Than Ubuntu and Linux Mint Right Now

How is CachyOS able to catch everyone’s attention?

Linux Mint

The distro that got people from ‘trying’ Linux to ‘staying’

Linux Mint is the most popular gateway distro—it’s what shows up whenever someone asks for the best Linux experience for newcomers. And it’s also one of the most successful distros that manages to retain users once they make the switch to Linux. Given the fact that most users started their Linux journey through Mint, it makes complete sense that it consistently sits near the top of DistroWatch. But why do so many users like Mint?

Well, Mint is by far one of the most flexible, beginner-friendly distros I’ve used, with a ridiculously high ceiling. It starts you off with a familiar Windows-like layout to ease your transition into Linux. But once you get comfortable, the distro grows with you. There are actually a bunch of powerful features hiding beneath the surface—not to overwhelm you if you’re new, but to reward your curiosity once you start to explore.

A few notable features include Nemo Actions, which lets you run bash scripts from the right-click context menu, fully customizable touchpad and touchscreen gestures with support for custom commands, a powerful extension system, and native support for desktop and panel widgets. You also get deep theming support. I was able to make Mint look like macOS, and it turned out pretty convincing.

Other than this, Mint is based on Ubuntu LTS, which means rock-solid stability and compatibility with almost every piece of hardware. The main downside is that packages in the official repository can be a bit dated, but that’s an easy problem to fix if you primarily download Flatpak apps.

You can download Linux Mint from here.

Linux Mint Logo on a default background.


I was too advanced for Linux Mint until I discovered these 3 power user features

Mint’s “beginner-friendly” reputation is hiding some serious power.

MX Linux

A serious distro for people seeking practical tools

I personally find it a shame that not many people know or talk about MX Linux. I have rarely seen articles or YouTube videos on the distro. Fortunately, real users do notice its charm and utility, earning it a place at the top of DistroWatch for the past few years now. In fact, MX Linux has been consistently beating more popular names like Ubuntu and Fedora. But what makes the distro so endearing?

Well, a big part of the reason is that the MX Linux team has made their distro compatible with a wide range of hardware. Firstly, the distro ships in three editions—KDE Plasma for modern machines, Xfce for mid-range systems, and Fluxbox for genuinely under-powered hardware. There’s also an AHS (Advanced Hardware Support) edition that ships with a newer kernel and updated graphics stack to make the distro more compatible with newer GPUs. This is important because MX Linux is based on Debian, which isn’t quite known for its support for the latest hardware.

The other thing that sets it apart is MX Tools—a collection of tools that let you tweak system-level settings through a graphical interface, similar to the Windows Control Panel. You get package management, GRUB configuration, system snapshots, cleanup tools—all in one place. On other distros, this kind of functionality is either fragmented or requires a terminal. MX Tools brings it all together and makes it accessible.

Finally, you’ve got native support for persistent live booting. You can essentially run MX Linux off a live USB and have your files, settings, and installed apps persist across reboots. This means you can carry your entire OS on a keychain. Granted, other distros also support persistent live booting, but they require some technical legwork. On MX Linux, this feature is a first-class citizen.

You can download MX Linux from here.

A desktop PC with MX Linux running and Fastfetch showing the MX Logo.


This distro nobody talks about is more popular than Ubuntu and Fedora—here’s 3 reasons why

The distro nobody talks about is beating the ones everybody uses.


How do I rank these three distros?

CachyOS takes the top spot for me—I’m a power user, and the performance gains are real and noticeable. MX Linux comes in second for its graphical tooling and persistent live USB support. Mint lands third, not because it’s bad, but because everything it offers beyond the basics I already get from KDE Plasma on the other two. Furthermore, my Linux journey started with Ubuntu, so I never had the Mint nostalgia.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


The battle between AMD and NVIDIA rages on eternally, it seems, though it’s rather a one-sided battle in the desktop PC market, where NVIDIA holds something like 95%, and AMD most of what’s left apart from Intel’s (almost) 1%.

But as dominant and popular as NVIDIA is, AMD proponents could always raise the value argument. On a per-dollar basis, you get more value with an AMD card, and even better, you have the benefit of AMD “FineWine” which ensures your card will become even better with time.

What “FineWine” meant—and why it mattered

FineWine was something that AMD fans began to notice during the GCN (Graphics Core Next) architecture. Incidentally, the last AMD dedicated GPU I bought was the R9 390, which was of that lineage. Since then, all my AMD GPUs have been embedded in consoles or handheld PCs, but I digress.

The R9 390 is actually a good example of FineWine. Launched in 2015, like many AMD cards, the R9 390 had a rough start, and I sold mine in exchange for a stopgap card in the form of the RTX 2060, because I wanted to play Cyberpunk 2077 on PC, where it wasn’t broken the way it was on consoles. Even though, on paper, the raw power of the RTX 2060 wasn’t much more than a 390, the AMD card’s performance on my (then) 1080p monitor was a stuttery mess, whereas everything suddenly ran great on my 2060 the minute the AMD GPU was expunged from the system.

But, a decade later, that same game is perfectly playable on this card, as you can see in this TechLabUK video.

A lot of it is because the developers have kept patching and improving the game, but this is something you see across the board for AMD cards on various games. This is FineWine. Years later, with continued driver updates from AMD, the cards go from being a little worse than their NVIDIA equivalent at launch to being as good or even a little better in the long run.

Of course, that’s not super helpful to customers who buy hardware at launch, but it has given some AMD users computers with longer lifespans than you’d think, and made many used AMD cards an even better bargain.

Why AMD’s FineWine era worked

A bit of smoke and mirrors

The PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT next to an AMD RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D. Credit: Ismar Hrnjicevic / How-To Geek

FineWine wasn’t magic, of course. The phenomenon was the result of a mix of factors. AMD’s architectures were in some cases a little too forward-thinking for the APIs of the day. Massively parallel with a focus on compute, they’d only come into their own with DirectX 12 and more modern games. NVIDIA’s cards at the time were better optimized to run current games well. Over time, NVIDIA cards would make similar architectural changes, but with better timing.

The other reason FineWine was a thing came down to driver maturity. As a much smaller company with fewer resources, it seems that AMD had some trouble releasing cards with optimized drivers. So, over time, the card would start performing as intended.

In both cases, you could frame FineWine not as the card getting better, but rather getting “less worse” over time. If you set the bar low at launch, the only way is up. However, there’s a third factor to take into account as well. AMD dominates console gaming. The two major home console series have now run on AMD GPUs for two generations, and so games are developed with that hardware in mind. This also gives newer titles a bit of a leg up, though it’s hard to know exactly by how much.

How AMD moved on from FineWine

It seems worse, but it’s actually better

An AMD RX 9070 XT Gigabyte gaming graphics card. Credit: Ismar Hrnjicevic / How-To Geek

With the shift to RDNA architecture, AMD made a deliberate change in philosophy. Modern Radeon GPUs are designed to perform well right out of the gate. Reviews on day one are much closer to what you could expect years later. There are still decent gains to be had on RDNA cards with game-specific optimizations (Spider-Man on PC is a great example), but the golden age of FineWine seems to be in the past now.

That’s a good thing! Products should put their best foot forward on day one, so let’s not shed a tear for FineWine in that regard. So it’s not so much that AMD doesn’t care about improving the performance and stability of older cards over the years, it’s that the company is now better at its job, and so there’s less room for improvement.

Sapphire NITRO+ AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT GPU

Cooling Method

Air

GPU Speed

2520Mhz

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT from Sapphire features 16GB of DDR6 memory, two HDMI and two DisplayPorts, and an overengineered cooling setup that will keep the card cool and whisper quiet no matter the workload.


NVIDIA kept the idea—but changed the formula

It’s all about AI

It’s funny, but these days I think of NVIDIA cards as the ones with major longevity. Take the venerable GTX 1080 and 1080 Ti cards. These cards only lost game-ready driver support in 2025, which doesn’t immediately make them useless, it just means no more optimization for those chips. What an incredible run, getting a decade of relevant game performance from a GPU!

But, that’s not really NVIDIA’s take on FineWine. Instead, the company has taken to adding new and better features to its cards long after they’ve been launched. Starting with the 20-series, the presence of machine-learning hardware means that by improving the AI algorithms for technologies like DLSS, these cards have become more performant with better image quality over time.

While NVIDIA has made some features of its AI technology exclusive to each generation, so far all post 10-series GPUs benefit from every new generation of DLSS. Compare that to AMD which not only offers inferior versions of this new upscaling technology, but has locked the better, more usable versions to later cards, such as the case with FSR Redstone.


FineWine is an ethos, not a brand

In the case of my humble RTX 4060 laptop, the release of DLSS 4.5 has opened new possibilities, notably the ability to target a 4K output resolution, which was certainly not on the table when I first took this computer out of the box. We might not call it “FineWine,” but it sure smells like it to me!



Source link