Zorin OS vs. Solus: I tested two great Linux distros for beginners to find out which is best


Solus

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Solus has come a long way since its humble beginnings.
  • You get just the right amount of preinstalled software and your choice of desktop.
  • Solus is close to Zorin OS, but two factors give Zorin OS the edge.

I recently tested Zorin OS 18.1 and dubbed it the best Linux distro – for anyone. I would go so far as to say that it’s the best OS I’ve ever used. That same day, I learned that Solus had a new release as well. 

Version 4.9 of Solus was released on April 18, and I opted to download the Budgie version of the OS. I’ve used the Budgie desktop many times and thought it would be a good comparison against Zorin OS.

Also: Why Zorin OS 18.1 is simply the best Linux distro – for anyone

Why make this comparison? That’s simple: I’m often asked which distribution is best suited for new users, and I always want to make sure I’m suggesting the right option. Because of that, I like to compare them — such as when I compared Linux Mint to Zorin OS

As I was testing Solus, it dawned on me that this Linux distribution could be easily recommended to those who’ve never used the open-source operating system. The more I dug in, the more I embraced that proposition.

But can it stand up to the mighty Zorin OS 18.1? That’s a high bar — let’s see if Solus 4.9 can reach it.

Preinstalled software

Just like Zorin OS, Solus has everything you need to get started without installing a single piece of software. You’ve got Firefox, Thunderbird, LibreOffice, Rythmbox, Celluloid, gedit (text editor), and all the usual bits and pieces that make up a desktop operating system.

Also: Can this $70 Linux app make up for the lack of Photoshop? I tried it to find out

And if you don’t find what you need, there’s a GUI app store (in the Budgie version, it’s KDE’s Discover) that has Flatpak support rolled in, so you can install a host of other apps (even proprietary ones like Slack and Spotify). 

Solus

KDE Discover is a great app store that anyone can use.

Screenshot by Jack Wallen/ZDNET

There’s one area where Zorin OS has the edge. If you attempt to install a Windows app (via a downloaded .exe file), Zorin OS will automatically inform you of an open-source alternative. For example, if you try to install MS Office, Zorin OS will tell you about LibreOffice. This is an important feature for new Linux users who don’t yet understand package managers or what can or cannot be installed.

Advantage: Zorin OS

Ease of use

Beyond the apps, the next thing you’ll want to know is if Solus is as easy to use as Zorin OS. I compared two different desktops (the Zorin OS uses a highly customized GNOME desktop, and, as mentioned earlier, I tested the Budgie flavor of Solus). In the end, both were very easy to use. They each offer a very familiar layout, include a simple menu where you can launch apps, enjoy well-designed notifications, allow you to install apps without ever touching the command line, and include all of the features you’ve grown accustomed to on a desktop OS (such as drag-and-drop, right-clicking, desktop launchers, and more).

Also: KDE Linux is the purest form of Plasma I’ve used in months – but there’s a catch

Were they equally easy to use? That’s a tricky question, because what’s easy for me might not be easy for you. On top of that, you can select a specific desktop environment for Solus, whereas Zorin OS offers only one desktop environment and lets you choose between four desktop layouts. (The Pro version gives you 10 layouts in total.)

That’s a point worth considering. If I imagine that I’m a new Linux user and I go to download Zorin OS 18.1, the task is simple. If, however, I’m a new user and I go to download Solus, I have to figure out which desktop version to download.

Advantage: Zorin OS

Aesthetics and customization

I’m not going to mince words here: Zorin OS is beautiful out of the box. No matter which layout you choose, you can be certain it’ll present an elegant desktop. 

Also: The best Linux laptops: Expert tested for students, hobbyists, and pros

With Solus, it depends on the desktop environment you select. Even then, it doesn’t quite match the beauty of Zorin OS. However (and this is a big however), some users prefer the simplicity and basicness of the Solus desktop designs. And while Zorin OS defaults to a light, airy theme, Solus leans heavily toward the darker side.

Solus

A customized Budgie desktop.

Screenshot by Jack Wallen/ZDNET

I prefer the lighter option, but I know many people who prefer dark modes. Of course, with each desktop Solus offers, you can change the theme fairly easily. Also, because Solus offers versions that include KDE Plasma and Xfce, both of which are highly customizable. I would go so far as to say that Xfce is the most customizable desktop on the market.

Advantage: Tie

Performance

This is where things get pretty simple. Although Zorin OS performs very well, you’re locked into the GNOME desktop. With Solus, you can choose the Xfce version, which is much lighter and faster. Even the Budgie version of Solus feels slightly faster than Zorin OS.

Also: You can use Linux 7.0 on these 7 distros today – here’s what to expect

I’ve tested every flavor of Solus. While the GNOME version places Solus on par with Zorin OS, the Xfce version is noticeably faster.

Advantage: Solus

My conclusion

Although Solus is a wonderful desktop operating system, Zorin OS edges it out thanks to its preinstalled software and aesthetics.

If you want the most user-friendly desktop Linux, go with Zorin OS. If you want a distribution that comes close but offers more customization and slightly better performance, go with Solus.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link