3 reasons why the Honda CR-V outsold the Ford F-150 for the first time in 44 years


Ford counts the F-150 through the heavy-duty F-600 as one nameplate, and by that measure, the F-Series has been America’s best-selling vehicle for 44 consecutive years. Break the F-150 out on its own, the way analytics firm Jato Dynamics and Automotive News do, and the streak has actually been interrupted twice since 2009: by the Toyota Camry that year, and by the Toyota RAV4 for the full calendar year in 2024.

Halfway through 2026, the F-150 has been passed again, but this time the winner is not the RAV4.

According to mid-year data from Automotive News, the Honda CR-V finished the first half of 2026 as the best-selling light-duty vehicle in the United States. Honda sold 226,114 CR-Vs through June, ahead of an estimated 209,311 for the F-150 and 194,807 for the Chevrolet Silverado 1500, according to GlobalData.

The RAV4 fell to fourth, with sales down 36% to 153,955 units.

Model to model, between the Ford F-150 and the Honda CR-V, the latter is on top at the halfway point of 2026. It took a specific mix of pricing, marketing strategy, and supply chain issues for the CR-V to gain the lead over the best-selling F-150.


1178749-16-1.jpg

403-1-1.png

Base Trim Engine

2.7L EcoBoost V6 ICE

Base Trim Transmission

10-speed automatic

Base Trim Drivetrain

Rear-Wheel Drive



3

Consumers want more affordable vehicles

Midsize SUVs offer a strong value-for-dollar proposition

The average new-vehicle transaction price is hovering at or near $50,000 today, the highest it’s ever been in the automotive industry. It seems the days of ultra-affordable cars have passed, and even a six-figure salary may not leave enough margin when factoring in the total cost of vehicle ownership.

Trucks like the F-150 span a wide range of MSRPs, some of which will fall below the national average. For example, the 2026 F-150 XL, STX, and XLT are under the national average of $50,000. However, trucks can easily jump in price with options and packages. Moving up to a fully loaded crew cab with leather and a sunroof will command a premium over an extended cab with cloth seats.

By contrast, a 2026 Honda CR-V starts at $30,920 for the entry-level LX. Even the top trim level, the Sport Touring Hybrid, is under the national average for new vehicle prices at $42,550.

Compared with full-size trucks, vehicles like the CR-V offer a lower sticker price and better fuel economy, both of which are selling points for buyers looking for an affordable family hauler. Today, vehicles like the CR-V offer good cargo space and the latest safety technologies, so buyers may not feel as if they are compromising by choosing something like it over a full-size truck.

At the same time, 48-month and 60-month loan terms are less common than they used to be, as many buyers have opted for 72- or 84-month financing to keep vehicle payments manageable. Financing a vehicle like the CR-V is more realistic for some versus a full-size pickup like the F-150.


Car Loan Calculator Image


Your car loan might be costing you $80 extra every month. Here’s how to fix it

If you have never thought about refinancing, these three steps will walk you through the process.

2

Supplier challenges left Ford short on trucks

Two fires at the same plant

The F-150’s second-place position to the CR-V mid-year might not be fully attributable to demand, but rather to what Ford could actually build.

A fire at Novelis’s aluminum plant in Oswego, New York, on September 16th, 2025, was followed by a second fire on November 20th in the same area, which was undergoing repairs. With the hot mill knocked offline until late May 2026 due to the fires, Ford was exposed to a brutal supply-chain crunch for its aluminum-body F-150, which ultimately cost the automaker an estimated $2 billion.

While the mill has finally restarted, the inventory bottleneck kept Ford on the defensive all spring. The Novelis facility supplies roughly 40% of the sheet aluminum used by the U.S. auto industry.

Toyota had its own hurdles with the RAV4, which may explain its mid-year position as the number four top-selling vehicle. The RAV4, now in its sixth generation, went hybrid-only for the 2026 model year. While the first units hit dealers in December 2025, the production changeover bottlenecked inventory at plants in Japan and North America through the winter.

Honda, running its CR-V plants at full capacity, kept dealer lots stocked while Ford and Toyota struggled to do so.


cropped-07-2026-honda-cr-v-trailsport.jpg

honda-logo.jpeg

Base Trim Engine

1.5L I4 Turbo

Base Trim Transmission

CVT

Base Trim Drivetrain

Front-Wheel Drive



1

Honda priced the CR-V to move

Nearly $1,300 off sticker price, on average

Dynamic front 3/4 shot of a green 2026 Honda CR-V Trailsport Hybrid. Credit: Honda

Along with having inventory when Ford and Toyota did not, Honda priced the CR-V to move and advertised it accordingly. As Edmunds noted, the CR-V’s real-world transaction price runs about 3% below MSRP, a savings of roughly $1,300, with the Sport Touring Hybrid discounted even further.

Honda also backed the CR-V with APR financing as low as 3.74 percent, in addition to standard cash offers for students, recent grads, and military members.

As noted above, the aluminum shortage left the F-150 with limited inventory to discount in the first place. Ford could not run a comparable incentive push.


Will Honda hold the lead for the rest of 2026

It’s possible, though unlikely. Novelis has returned to full production, and Ford expects F-150 output to normalize in the second half of the year. Toyota’s Kentucky plant began building the new RAV4 in June and is expected to add roughly 40,000 units before the end of 2026.

The first half of 2026 showed what happens when two of America’s best-selling vehicles run short at the same time. Regardless of its year-end sales ranking, the 2026 Honda CR-V is still one of the best SUVs on the market today.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


1,000W, 10-port charger for $45... predictably disappointing.

1,000W, 10-port charger for $45… predictably disappointing. 

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Things that look “too good to be true” invariable are just that.
  • This example got dangerously hot in a short period of time before dying. 
  • There’s no legitimate charger that comes close to delivering on the 1,000W promise.

Being a tech reviewer for a living means that I get offered some very interesting things. Not interesting as in Bugatti supercars or jewel-encrusted Fabergé eggs, but interesting as in “this thing could easily be a fire hazard — want to take a look?”

Also: The best GaN chargers of 2026: Expert tested

Submissively, I often say yes. And I’m glad I did with the most recent pitch, because it was very interesting indeed.

Meet the “interesting” charger

This time around, the thing of interest was a charger that claimed to deliver an incredible 1,000W through its ten ports — four 140W USB-C ports, four 100W USB-C ports, and two 20W USB-A ports. 

The person who bought this charger told me that they’d plugged it in, used it to charge their phone for “a few minutes,” got worried when it became “a little hot,” and unplugged it.

That's a lot of promise... but (spoilers), they don't deliver!

That’s a lot of promise… but (spoilers), they don’t deliver!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The unit was suspiciously light and plasticky, especially given its built-in power supply. Compare this to Ugreen’s Nexode 500W charger, which weighs a hair under 5 lb.

There was also a slight whiff of melty plastic, which made me think that this had been a bit more than a little hot. 

Also: This $4 router reboot timer is the cheap internet fix I didn’t know I needed – and it works reliably

Color me suspicious, but I had a gut feeling that the only way this charger would be able to push out 1,000W would be if it caught fire. 

Turns out I wasn’t far wrong.

How long would it last? Answer: Minutes

Talk is cheap. It was time to test the charger. 

So I plugged it in, turned it on, and started using it. Within a couple of minutes of starting to use it, I noticed a few things:

  • No matter what I tried, I couldn’t persuade the charger to deliver more than about 60W from any of the ports. 
  • As for peak output, I managed to get close to 250W.
  • The power output was very uneven and noisy, fluctuating wildly. The more ports I used, the worse it got.
  • The unit got very hot to the touch very quickly, even under light loads. 
  • But… before I could get the thermal camera out to check how hot it got, there was a pop and the unmistakable smell of “Magic Smoke.” The charger had been sent to Silicon Heaven within minutes.

Annnnd… POP! This is the moment the charger gave up the ghost.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Diagnosis time

Time to take it apart and have a look inside. For an item that plugged into the mains power, this unit was shockingly easy to take apart. 

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

And even unplugged and broken, it was capable of delivering zaps! If the case came off while this was plugged into an outlet, it could very easily be deadly.

There’s charge still in some of the capacitors, and these could deliver quite a zap despite the unit being broken and unplugged!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

After getting inside, the unit was filled with a grey goo that I’d seen in a previous disappointing charger I’d taken apart. This is a thermal paste that’s used to try to dissipate the heat generated by the components. 

It’s not really going to work because it’s sealed in a plastic box with no effective heatsink. It’s a token gesture at best. At worst, it creates a mass that’ll slowly heat up and hold temperature because it’s got no way to get rid of it.

Behold the grey goo!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Next to this goo was a bank of capacitors — the black cylinders in the photo — which were the cause of the failure. They’d clearly overheated, with three of them showing signs of bulging.

The problem!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Well there’s the problem!

I also noticed that two of the components — bridge rectifiers that are used to turn AC mains into DC — have been fixed on an angle to make the touch a metal heatsink. It’s not really an effective way to cool down components.

The bottom line

Another “too good to be true” device bites the dust. It’s not the first one I’ve come across, and it won’t be the last.

Moral of the story here is that manufactures are using big number marketing — in this case 1,000W and masses of ports — to scalewash poor quality products. 

This might be a half-decent product if it was built to deliver 100W, but there’s no end of competition at that end of the market. Silkscreen “1,000W” on the outside, sprinkle in a few reviews that feel scripted and fake, and all of a sudden it’s interesting and exciting… right up until it blows up. 

Also: My top 7 laptop-bag essentials now, after decades of remote work

I know of no 1,000W charger. In fact, the 500W Ugreen Nexode is the highest-power charger that I’ve tested that’s legit. And the price is also legit — $250. 

But it’s built to deliver on what it promises and is packed with safety features, including “tip-over protection,” which cuts the output when the unit tips over and prevents it from falling on its side, where it can’t dissipate heat effectively. Now that’s an attention to safety that I like to see in a product that handles that much power. 

But if you want 1,000W of output, you’ll have to buy two and duct tape them together.





Source link