Galaxy Watch has the feature your smart home needs—but Samsung won’t let you use it


Samsung smartwatches like the Galaxy Watch 8 are incredible fitness trackers and productivity tools. However, the NFC (Near Field Communication) feature on the Galaxy Watch is largely out of bounds for smart home use, and that’s a shame.

Here’s how those tags should work, and what they could enable through the gadget on your wrist.

Run a whole routine without looking at a screen

If you use an NFC-friendly smart home platform like Home Assistant, you can set up automations that perform multiple functions at once when you activate a tag. You can turn on a whole set of lights, shut off your home theater, or cue up music just by bringing a device close. So long as your hardware is compatible (and it probably is, SmartThings changes aside), it’s just a question of what you want to do rather than whether it’s possible.

That makes it far easier to manage a smart home. You can wake up your entire household when you walk through the door, prime your living room for movie night, or otherwise handle tasks that would normally require tapping on screens or pressing buttons. I gave up on my early smart home when I realized how many headaches were involved, but NFC tags have eliminated a lot of that pain.

Yes, Samsung has a SmartThings app on the Galaxy Watch that lets you control automated scenes. If you just need core functionality and are willing to be slightly more patient, that’s plenty. But it’s not as sophisticated as a tool like Home Assistant, and NFC tags are simply faster. If you’re tired at the end of a long day, wouldn’t you rather activate a tag and crash on the couch instead of navigating an app?

Ever use your shoe to turn on a security system?

A storage bin with an NFC tag stuck to the outside of it. Credit: Adam Davidson / How-To Geek

Samsung is also missing out simply because of what and where you could place tags to control using a Galaxy Watch. You don’t need dedicated tags—payment cards, gym fobs, and even your shoes work as long as there’s an NFC chip inside. Imagine tapping the tongue of your sneakers to activate your home security system, or prepping for your pet’s nap time by tapping the Bluetooth tracker in their collar.

Moreover, you can place NFC tags wherever they make sense, including locations where it would be easier to use a smartwatch for activation than anything else. Want to let everyone know you’re home? Flick your wrist near a tag on the front door. Need reminders to water the houseplants? Put stickers on the pots so that you set timely alerts, even while you’re holding the watering can. If you’re forgetful like me, this can save you a lot of hassle.

And if you’re worried about security, you can always put NFC tags in secret locations or require specific devices. If you’d rather not enter a code (or hop into your car) to open your garage door from the outside, you can link a tag to your Galaxy Watch. Want to be smooth when you’re setting up your apartment for date night? Hide a tag near a lamp so that you can dim the lights without making it too obvious.


Why doesn’t Samsung open NFC on the Galaxy Watch?

Samsung has previously justified its NFC restrictions on the Galaxy Watch as a security measure. This theoretically makes it harder for hackers to steal payment data, or to compromise the device itself. That’s understandable at a time when even public USB chargers are security risks—you don’t want attackers ruining your day thanks to a rogue card reader.

However, the absence of NFC tag support also shuts down the realm of possibilities. For now, you’ll still have to poke at your watch’s display or set up special controllers to streamline your smart home. And that’s a shame when there’s the potential to remove most of the friction — I’d be more likely to automate my entire house if I could quickly control it without having to poke or say anything.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


1,000W, 10-port charger for $45... predictably disappointing.

1,000W, 10-port charger for $45… predictably disappointing. 

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Things that look “too good to be true” invariable are just that.
  • This example got dangerously hot in a short period of time before dying. 
  • There’s no legitimate charger that comes close to delivering on the 1,000W promise.

Being a tech reviewer for a living means that I get offered some very interesting things. Not interesting as in Bugatti supercars or jewel-encrusted Fabergé eggs, but interesting as in “this thing could easily be a fire hazard — want to take a look?”

Also: The best GaN chargers of 2026: Expert tested

Submissively, I often say yes. And I’m glad I did with the most recent pitch, because it was very interesting indeed.

Meet the “interesting” charger

This time around, the thing of interest was a charger that claimed to deliver an incredible 1,000W through its ten ports — four 140W USB-C ports, four 100W USB-C ports, and two 20W USB-A ports. 

The person who bought this charger told me that they’d plugged it in, used it to charge their phone for “a few minutes,” got worried when it became “a little hot,” and unplugged it.

That's a lot of promise... but (spoilers), they don't deliver!

That’s a lot of promise… but (spoilers), they don’t deliver!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The unit was suspiciously light and plasticky, especially given its built-in power supply. Compare this to Ugreen’s Nexode 500W charger, which weighs a hair under 5 lb.

There was also a slight whiff of melty plastic, which made me think that this had been a bit more than a little hot. 

Also: This $4 router reboot timer is the cheap internet fix I didn’t know I needed – and it works reliably

Color me suspicious, but I had a gut feeling that the only way this charger would be able to push out 1,000W would be if it caught fire. 

Turns out I wasn’t far wrong.

How long would it last? Answer: Minutes

Talk is cheap. It was time to test the charger. 

So I plugged it in, turned it on, and started using it. Within a couple of minutes of starting to use it, I noticed a few things:

  • No matter what I tried, I couldn’t persuade the charger to deliver more than about 60W from any of the ports. 
  • As for peak output, I managed to get close to 250W.
  • The power output was very uneven and noisy, fluctuating wildly. The more ports I used, the worse it got.
  • The unit got very hot to the touch very quickly, even under light loads. 
  • But… before I could get the thermal camera out to check how hot it got, there was a pop and the unmistakable smell of “Magic Smoke.” The charger had been sent to Silicon Heaven within minutes.

Annnnd… POP! This is the moment the charger gave up the ghost.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Diagnosis time

Time to take it apart and have a look inside. For an item that plugged into the mains power, this unit was shockingly easy to take apart. 

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

And even unplugged and broken, it was capable of delivering zaps! If the case came off while this was plugged into an outlet, it could very easily be deadly.

There’s charge still in some of the capacitors, and these could deliver quite a zap despite the unit being broken and unplugged!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

After getting inside, the unit was filled with a grey goo that I’d seen in a previous disappointing charger I’d taken apart. This is a thermal paste that’s used to try to dissipate the heat generated by the components. 

It’s not really going to work because it’s sealed in a plastic box with no effective heatsink. It’s a token gesture at best. At worst, it creates a mass that’ll slowly heat up and hold temperature because it’s got no way to get rid of it.

Behold the grey goo!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Next to this goo was a bank of capacitors — the black cylinders in the photo — which were the cause of the failure. They’d clearly overheated, with three of them showing signs of bulging.

The problem!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Well there’s the problem!

I also noticed that two of the components — bridge rectifiers that are used to turn AC mains into DC — have been fixed on an angle to make the touch a metal heatsink. It’s not really an effective way to cool down components.

The bottom line

Another “too good to be true” device bites the dust. It’s not the first one I’ve come across, and it won’t be the last.

Moral of the story here is that manufactures are using big number marketing — in this case 1,000W and masses of ports — to scalewash poor quality products. 

This might be a half-decent product if it was built to deliver 100W, but there’s no end of competition at that end of the market. Silkscreen “1,000W” on the outside, sprinkle in a few reviews that feel scripted and fake, and all of a sudden it’s interesting and exciting… right up until it blows up. 

Also: My top 7 laptop-bag essentials now, after decades of remote work

I know of no 1,000W charger. In fact, the 500W Ugreen Nexode is the highest-power charger that I’ve tested that’s legit. And the price is also legit — $250. 

But it’s built to deliver on what it promises and is packed with safety features, including “tip-over protection,” which cuts the output when the unit tips over and prevents it from falling on its side, where it can’t dissipate heat effectively. Now that’s an attention to safety that I like to see in a product that handles that much power. 

But if you want 1,000W of output, you’ll have to buy two and duct tape them together.





Source link