YouTube Premium’s price goes up to $15.99 in June – but you can save $32 with one change


I was overpaying for YouTube Premium for months without realizing it - check yours ASAP

Elyse Betters Picaro / ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • YouTube is raising prices by $2 to $4 a month.
  • The increase applies to all monthly subscriptions and the annual plan.
  • This is just the latest move among streaming services to boost prices.

Do you subscribe to YouTube Premium? If so, you’ll soon be paying premium prices to watch your favorite videos.

Both new and existing subscribers are getting socked by higher price tags due to go into effect with the June billing cycle. The sign-up page for YouTube Premium reveals the gory details. But here are the increases for each plan:

  • Lite plan: $8.99 per month, up from $7.99.
  • Student plan: $8.99 per month, up from $7.99.
  • Individual plan: $15.99 per month, up from $13.99.
  • Family plan: $26.99 per month, up from $22.99.

Also: I was overpaying for YouTube Premium for months without realizing it – check yours ASAP

One way to save money on an individual plan is to opt for an annual subscription instead of a monthly one. But even here, YouTube is boosting the price to $159.99, up from $139.99. If you subscribe through Apple, the news is even worse. With Apple taking its usual 30% cut of the action, you’ll shell out 30% more than if you sign up for YouTube Premium at the website.

YouTube has been alerting current subscribers about the price increases via email. One person who has the individual plan through Apple shared the email on Reddit, which read in part: “To continue delivering great service and features, we’re increasing your price to $20.99/month. We don’t make these decisions lightly, but this update will allow us to continue to improve Premium and support the creators and artists you watch on YouTube.”

Save by signing up directly on YouTube

The email also told this person that they would save on their Premium subscription by signing up directly on the website, where the new rate would be $15.99/month.

Compared with free YouTube, a Premium plan offers several perks. You can watch videos ad-free, download and play them offline, and run videos in the background while doing something else. With all plans except Lite, you can listen to music ad-free in the YouTube Music app and enjoy other benefits.

Also: Why YouTube with ads just isn’t worth it for me anymore – even if it’s free

The last time YouTube bumped up the cost of its Premium subscriptions was in 2023. At that point, the price of an individual plan rose to $13.99 a month from $11.99, while the cost of an annual plan increased to $139.99 from $119.99.

Over the past year, price increases have run rampant among video streamers. Last month, Netflix raised the cost of its standard plan with ads by $1 per month and the cost of its ad-free standard and premium plans by $2. Last October, the price tag for Hulu with Live TV jumped to $90 a month, up from $82. In September, Disney+ raised subscription prices across the board by $2 to $3 per month.

Time to review your subscriptions

The irony here is that streaming video services were initially touted as a cheaper alternative to a full cable TV subscription. While that’s still true individually, many of us pay for multiple streaming services, which means our monthly bills may be even more exorbitant.

With YouTube and other services all boosting their prices, now is as good a time as any to review all your streaming subscriptions and see which ones you can downgrade or cancel outright. Also consider free or inexpensive streaming services, such as Roku TV or Tubi TV, both of which offer a variety of movies and TV series to enjoy.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Vibe coding has taken the development world by storm—and it truly is a modern marvel to behold. The problem is, the vibe coding rush is going to leave a lot of apps broken in its wake once people move on to the next craze. At the end of the day, many of us are going to be left with apps that are broken with no fixes in sight.

A lot of vibe “coders” are really just prompt typers

And they’ve never touched a line of code

An AI robot using a computer with a prompt field on the screen. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

Vibe coding made development available to the masses like never before. You can simply take an AI tool, type a prompt into a text box, and out pops an app. It probably needs some refinement, but, typically, version one is still functional whenever you’re vibe coding.

The problem comes from “developers” who have never written a line of code. They’re just using vibe coding because it’s cool or they think they can make a quick buck, but they really have no knowledge of development—or any desire to learn proper development.

Think of those types of vibe coders as people who realize they can use a calculator and online tools to solve math problems for them, so they try to build a rocket. They might be able to make something work in some way, but they’ll never reach the moon, even though they think they can.

Anyone can vibe code a prototype

But you really need to know what you’re doing to build for the long haul

For those who don’t know what they’re doing, vibe coding is a fantastic way to build a prototype. I’ve vibe coded several projects so far, and out of everything I’ve done, I’ve realized one thing—vibe coding is only as good as the person behind the keyboard. I have spent more time debugging the fruits of my vibe coding than I have actually vibe coding.

Each project that I’ve built with vibe coding could have easily been “viable” within an hour or two, sometimes even less time than that. But, to make something of actual quality, it has always taken many, many hours.

Vibe coding is definitely faster than traditional coding if you’re a one-man team, but it’s not something that is fast by any means if you’re after a quality product. The same goes for continued updates.

I’ve spent the better part of three months building a weather app for iPhone. It’s a simple app, but it also has quite a lot of complex things going on in the background.

It recently got released in the App Store—no small feat at all. But, I still get a few crash reports a week, and I’m constantly squashing bugs and working on new features for the app. This is because I’m planning on supporting the app for a long time, not just the weekend I released it, and that takes a lot more work.

Vibe coders often jump from app to app without thinking of longevity

The app was a weekend project, after all

A relaxed man lounging on an orange beanbag watches as a friendly yellow robot works on a laptop for him, while multiple red exclamation-mark warning icons float around them. Credit: Lucas Gouveia/How-To Geek | ViDI Studio/Shutterstock

I’ve seen it far too often, a vibe coder touting that they built this “complex app” in 48 hours, as if that is something to be celebrated. Sure, it’s cool that a working version of an app was up and running in two days, but how well does it work? How many bugs are still in it? Are there race conditions that cause a random crash?

My weather app has a weird race condition right now I’m tracking down. It crashes, on occasion, when opened from Spotlight on an iPhone. Not every time does that cause a crash, just sometimes.

If a vibe coder’s only goal is to build apps in short amounts of time so they can brag about how fast they built the app, they likely aren’t going to take the time to fix little things like that.

I don’t vibe code my apps that way, and I know many other vibe coders that aren’t that way—but we all started with actual coding, not typing a prompt.


Anyone can be a vibe coder, but not all vibe coders are developers

“And when everyone’s super… no one will be.” – Syndrome, The Incredibles. It might be from a kids’ movie, but it rings true in the era of vibe coding. When everyone thinks they can build an app in a weekend, everyone thinks they’re a developer.

By contrast, not every vibe coder is actually a developer, and that’s the problem. It’s hard to know if the app you’re using was built by someone who has plans to support the app long-term or not—and that’s why there’s going to be a lot of broken apps in the future.

I can see it now, the apps that people built in a weekend as a challenge will simply go without updates. While the app might work for the first few weeks or months just fine, an API update comes along and breaks the app’s compatibility. It’s at that point we’ll see who was vibe coding to build an app versus who was vibe coding just for online clout—and the sad part is, consumers will lose out more often than not with broken apps.



Source link