You’re using your NAS wrong if you aren’t separating your data


At this point, I have several NAS servers around my house. The best thing I ever did, though, wasn’t setting up five NAS servers. It was separating the important data from replaceable data. That is when running a NAS finally clicked with me, and I wish I had done it a long time ago.

My homelab used to have just one NAS for everything

If that NAS was down, everything was down

A Lenovo RD440 rack-mount server mounted to a 27U rack in a homelab. Credit: Patrick Campanale / How-To Geek

Like many homelabbers, my homelab started out fairly small. Originally, I had a 4-bay Synology NAS, and eventually replaced that with a 12-bay retired enterprise server. In both scenarios, I only had one storage server up and running at one time.

For a while, that was fine. My NAS (network attached storage server) really didn’t do much more than house my Plex media. However, over time, I started to want to store more and more data on the NAS, and found myself hesitant because I didn’t have a real backup solution.

Not only that, but I also didn’t want to deal with the downtime potential that was there. I love my enterprise server, but it required a ton of maintenance up front when I first got started with everything.

Because of this, every time my server was down, my storage was down. This is fine if the storage is just used for incidental files, like movies and TV shows, but it’s not acceptable if it’s production files like photos or videos actively being worked on.

So, I basically only kept archival files on the NAS. Active projects never went to the NAS because it wasn’t ready for it. That all changed once I got a second NAS.

Once I got a second NAS, I started separating my data

Important files go on one, and easy to obtain files go on the other

Once I had two NAS systems in my homelab, I actually started using them in the way they were intended. Originally, while I wanted my NAS to be a place to store files, it became a place to store only my movies and TV shows.

When I got my second one, I actually started to be able to use it and rely on it. My original Lenovo RD440 rack-mount server kept its initial use: storing media server files. I migrated everything else off of the RD440 to my second NAS and it was such a better experience.

Now, I have several NAS systems in my homelab, but each one plays a very important role. Some NAS servers only store replaceable data—things I can re-download in a few moments. I have one NAS whose sole purpose is keeping a local backup of my Google Drive in case anything ever happens to my Google account—that’s easy to replace (unless Google cans the account).

Other NAS servers are where my important data live. I have my photography archives going back over a decade stored on one of my NAS servers. That’s irreplaceable to me. I could never get those photos back again, so it has to be on a NAS with new drives, plenty of redundancy, and cloud backup.

It’s just really nice to know which NAS can be shut down without worry and which I need to be worried about uptime with. Separating the NAS servers gave me a peace I didn’t know I was missing.

I can now back the systems up to each other for added redundancy

RAID isn’t a backup

Synology DS225 Plus 2-bay NAS with a Synology HAT3300-4T drive sliding into the front bay. Credit: Patrick Campanale / How-To Geek

One more thing that played into me having more confidence in the NAS systems was the ability to back up to each other. Whereas before, I only had one NAS server, so I could only have one copy on the server and one in the cloud, now I can have multiple.

Important information I can have stored on my primary NAS and then automatically have it back up to another NAS every night. This gives me two local copies, plus the remote copy I have when it backs up to the cloud.

Some might say that my backup strategy is overkill—having multiple network attached storage servers at home plus cloud backup. But, there’s just some information that I simply don’t want to risk losing, and this is the best way I’ve found to avoid that.

  • Synology DS225+ Network Attached Storage server.

    Brand

    Synology

    CPU

    Intel Celeron J4125

    Memory

    2GB

    Drive Bays

    2

    Expansion

    None

    Ports

    2x USB 3.2 Gen 1

    The Synology DS225+ is a great beginner storage server. It features two 3.5-inch hard drive bays and both 2.5Gb Ethernet and Gigabit Ethernet. Designed around Synology’s Disk Station Manager operating system, this NAS offers a simplified experience that anyone will feel at home using. 


  • UGREEN NASync DSP2800 thumbnail

    Brand

    UGREEN

    CPU

    Intel 12th Gen N-Series

    Memory

    8GB (Upgradeable to 16GB)

    Drive Bays

    2 x 22TB

    Ports

    2.5GbE, USB-C, USB-A (x3)

    Caching

    Expandable up to 8TB

    This cutting-edge network-attached storage device transforms how you store and access data via smartphones, laptops, tablets, and TVs anywhere with network access.


  • UGREEN NAS DXP4800 Plus 4-Bay Desktop NASync.

    CPU

    Intel Pentium Gold 8505 5-Core

    Memory

    8GB DDR5

    Drive Bays

    4

    Dimensions

    10.14″D x 7.01″W x 7.01″H

    Weight

    3.79 Kilograms

    With 4 bays available to add up to 136TB of storage, the UGREEN NAS DXP4800 can store all of your data safely and securely.



Sometimes, redundancy is the best solution

While I don’t have mirrored NAS servers like some out there, I think that my setup is perfect for me. I’m able to keep the important documents on a newer NAS that has newer drives in it, and then the replaceable files live on the older system with refurbished drives.

I don’t expect the old system to die at all, but it just gives that extra peace of mind that I needed before diving into using a NAS the way I now do.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Lincolns often get written off as just fancy Fords, but that really undersells what they’re trying to do. Sure, they share parts underneath, but Lincoln usually goes all-in on making things feel quieter, softer, and more premium inside.

A good example is the Lincoln MKC from about a decade ago. It’s closely related to the Ford Escape, but the way it drives and feels puts it closer to compact luxury SUVs like the BMW X3 than you might expect.

Fast-forward to today, and depreciation has done its thing. That same MKC has quietly become a bit of a bargain if you’re shopping used and trying to avoid modern new-car prices.

In order to give you the most up-to-date and accurate information possible, the data used to compile this article was sourced from BMW and Lincoln, as well as other authoritative sources including CarBuzz, CarComplaints (1/2), and RepairPal.


Close-up shot of the dashboard of a 2024 Toyota RAV4 at night with its ambient lighting.


Luxury Car Features That Are Now Available in Affordable Vehicles

Even the most affordable cars now offer luxury experiences with advanced technology and premium comforts once reserved for high-end models.

Lincoln’s quiet shift into compact luxury

How the brand moved beyond its old-school limo image

2009-2011 Lincoln Town Car Silver Front View Driving Credit: Lincoln

For a long time, Lincoln was all about big, plush sedans and the heavyweight Navigator SUV. It wasn’t really a brand people thought of for small, everyday crossovers.

That started to change when luxury makers began chasing more mainstream buyers with compact SUVs. Lincoln stepped in with models like the MKC, especially after Mercury was shut down in 2010 and Ford needed Lincoln to cover more of that “premium but not outrageous” space.

Lincoln jumped straight into the segment with the MKC, which first appeared as a lightly disguised concept at the 2013 Detroit Auto Show. It then reappeared later that year in near-production form at the Los Angeles Auto Show.

Static side profile shot of a white 2013 Lincoln MKC Concept. Credit: NetCarShow.com

Sales began for the 2015 model year, backed by a marketing push starring Matthew McConaughey. His moody, slow-burn commercials helped give Lincoln a more modern image and got people talking.

The strategy worked, especially with younger luxury buyers. Around half of MKC buyers were new to Lincoln, many coming from Mercedes, Lexus, and BMW.

The MKC shared its front-wheel-drive architecture with the third-generation Ford Escape and stayed on sale through 2020 before being replaced by the current Lincoln Corsair. Despite that mainstream foundation, it still managed to feel properly upscale in day-to-day driving.

It launched at just under $34,000 for 2015 and came loaded with features, punchy turbocharged engines, and one of the quieter, more relaxed rides in its class. For a vehicle with Escape roots, it did a surprisingly good job of feeling like something more premium.

Static rear 3/4 shot of a silver 2015 Lincoln MKC. Credit: NetCarShow.com

Lincoln gave the MKC a pretty big refresh for 2019, and that’s the version most buyers should be looking at today. It brought a cleaner front-end design, a nicer interior, and more standard tech across the board.

On top of that, it refined what was already a fairly comfortable, quiet SUV. The result is a 2019 MKC that feels even more like a genuine alternative to the BMW X3 than earlier models did.


2026 Buick Envision


Forget the Lexus NX—This American SUV offers more value for less money

This hidden gem from GM may outshine the NX terms of value and features.

How the MKC holds up today

A budget luxury SUV that still feels surprisingly refined

The 2019 MKC came with two turbocharged four-cylinder engines, with the more powerful one reserved for higher trims. That engine was paired exclusively with all-wheel drive, pushing fully-loaded Black Label models close to $50,000.

By comparison, the 2019 BMW X3 started around $41,000 with its turbo four, offering similar real-world performance but in a more tightly engineered package. The Lincoln doesn’t really try to win on dynamics—it leans hard on equipment instead.

Even base MKC models were well-equipped with 18-inch wheels, a power tailgate, parking sensors, remote start, a Wi-Fi hotspot, Apple CarPlay, and Android Auto. Forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking were standard, while blind-spot monitoring, lane-keeping assist, cross-traffic alert, and active park assist were available higher up the range.

The X3, despite its higher price, made Apple CarPlay part of an optional package and didn’t offer Android Auto at all.

2019 Lincoln MKC

2019 BMW X3

Engine

2.0-liter inline-4 turbo

2.3-liter inline-4 turbo

2.0-liter inline-4 turbo

3.0-liter inline-6 turbo

Transmission

6-speed automatic

8-speed automatic

Drivetrain

FWD/AWD

AWD

RWD/AWD

AWD

Power

245 hp

285 hp

248 hp

355 hp

Torque

275 lb-ft

305 lb-ft

258 lb-ft

369 lb-ft

0–60 mph

7.5 seconds (est)

6.8 seconds (est)

6.0 seconds

4.6 seconds

EPA fuel economy

18–20 mpg city / 25–27 mpg highway / 20–23 mpg combined

20–23 mpg city / 27–30 mpg highway / 23–26 mpg combined

Starting MSRP

$33,995

$43,035

$41,000

$54,500

Inside, the MKC is very much focused on comfort. The front seats are soft, supportive, and come standard with heating, which on the X3 was only available through an extra package.

You also get 12-way power adjustment with four-way lumbar support, while the BMW sticks to 10-way seats without power lumbar adjustment. It’s a clear win for the Lincoln on everyday comfort and convenience.

Materials up front are generally decent, but things do feel a bit cheaper as you move into the rear. Rear headroom is also on the tight side, especially with the panoramic roof, and that’s where the X3 pulls ahead.

The BMW also has a noticeable advantage when it comes to cargo space.

Make and model

2019 Lincoln MKC

2019 BMW X3

Headroom front / rear

39.6 inches / 38.7 inches

41.1 inches / 39.1 inches

Legroom front / rear

42.8 inches / 36.8 inches

40.3 inches / 36.4 inches

Cargo space behind rear seats / maximum

25.2 cu ft / 53.1 cu ft

28.7 cu ft / 62.7 cu ft

Dimensions L/W/H

179.2 inches / 73.4 inches / 65.2 inches

185.9 inches / 74.4 inches / 66.0 inches

On the road, the MKC is more composed than you’d expect, and even a bit sporty if it’s fitted with the adaptive dampers. It doesn’t come close to the X3 for steering sharpness or overall balance, but it’s more capable than its comfort-first image suggests.

The BMW still feels like the better driver’s SUV, thanks to its rear-wheel-drive foundation. It delivers tighter body control, better feedback, and a more cohesive feel overall.

The MKC’s engines are responsive enough for everyday driving, but they’re not exactly exciting. The X3, on the other hand, feels more energetic across the board, with a sharper turbo four and a much stronger inline-six option—though you’ll pay a lot more for it.


Front 3/4 shot of a 2026 BMW iX3


How BMW Takes the Fight To Tesla With the New 2026 iX3

BMW has just revealed its all-new 2026 iX3, a sleek electric SUV designed to rival Tesla with cutting-edge tech, bold design, and impressive range.

What you’ll pay for a used MKC today

Luxury SUV comfort without the luxury price tag

Looking on the CarBuzz Marketplace, used MKCs are still surprisingly affordable, even for later models with lower mileage. As mentioned earlier, the 2019 version is the one to aim for thanks to its updated styling, tech, and overall refinement.

With around $15,000 to spend, you get a lot of SUV for the money considering the standard equipment. Prices can start near $10,000, but those examples usually come with well over 100,000 miles.

Push closer to that $15,000 mark and the options open up quite a bit. Clean 2019 MKCs with around 60,000 miles or less start to become realistic, making it feel like a proper bargain.

Most listings come with the standard 2.0-liter turbo engine, while AWD typically doesn’t add much to the price. The more powerful 2.3-liter turbo usually costs a bit more, often a couple thousand dollars extra.

Dynamic front-end shot of a white 2019 Lincoln MKC. Credit: NetCarShow.com

Compared to the 2019 BMW X3, the MKC looks even more tempting, since clean X3s with under 100,000 miles rarely drop below the $15,000 mark. Based on CarBuzz pricing trends, the BMW typically costs about $4,300 more on average, although there are far more listings to choose from.

That said, there are a few things to keep in mind. The 2019 MKC has above-average reliability ratings from RepairPal, but it’s not completely trouble-free.

CarComplaints has reported recurring engine issues, especially coolant intrusion problems with the 2.0-liter that can lead to serious failures. The optional 2.3-liter turbo is generally considered the safer bet, with stronger performance and better long-term durability.

Earlier MKCs can show similar issues, so it’s important to check service history carefully. A full pre-purchase inspection is a must before committing to any example.

Dynamic rear 3/4 shot of a white 2019 Lincoln MKC. Credit: NetCarShow.com

The 2019 X3 generally scores better for reliability, but it’s still not completely problem-free. CarComplaints notes reports of coolant leaks, cooling system failures, and the odd electronic issue, especially as mileage climbs.

The six-cylinder models tend to be seen as the most solid and desirable, but they also come with a much higher price tag on the used market. And like most older BMWs, running costs and repairs can end up being noticeably higher than what you’d typically see with domestic brands.


Front 3/4 shot of a 2019 Lexus UX


10 Used Hybrids That Deliver Luxury On A Budget

These 10 used hybrids offer premium features, smooth rides, and great efficiency—proving you don’t need to spend big for luxury.

Luxury SUV value, but not without trade-offs

Big comfort and low prices, balanced by a few ownership risks

Static front 3/4 shot of a white 2019 Lincoln MKC parked on a driveway. Credit: NetCarShow.com

For buyers willing to live with a few compromises, the Lincoln MKC offers a lot of luxury SUV for not much money. A clean 2019 example can undercut a comparable BMW X3 by thousands while still bringing strong comfort, plenty of features, and decent performance.

That said, it’s not a totally worry-free buy. Known issues—especially around the 2.0-liter engine—can take some of the shine off the deal. Shopping carefully and leaving room in the budget for potential repairs is key if the MKC’s bargain pricing is going to stay that way.



Source link