If you’re planning to buy a gaming laptop with Intel’s latest chips, it might not be as simple as picking your favorite brand. As per PCWorld’s report, Intel is rolling out its new Core Ultra 200HX Plus processors in phases.
Intel
Essentially, it means that some laptop makers are getting early access while others may have to wait months. That creates a slightly awkward situation for buyers, because two laptops with similar specs on paper may launch at very different times depending on which brand you’re looking at.
Why are some laptops getting the new chips earlier?
The staggered rollout appears to come down to how Intel is distributing its supply. The report states that laptops from brands like Lenovo (Legion 7i) and Razer (Blade 18) are among the first to ship with the new chips. Meanwhile, systems from companies like Dell, MSI, Acer, and ASUS may not arrive until Q2 or even Q3 2026.
In other words, Intel seems to be prioritizing certain OEM partners, at least in the early stages of the launch. At the same time, Intel itself has said that Core Ultra 200HX Plus-powered systems will roll out “throughout the year”, which aligns with the idea of a phased release rather than a single global launch. Interestingly, the ASUS TUF 2026 lineup, which was revealed recently, does feature the new 200HX Plus series chips, though ASUS hasn’t revealed the pricing or availability.
What does this mean for buyers?
This isn’t just a behind-the-scenes supply issue, as it directly impacts what buyers can actually purchase. If someone is loyal to a specific brand like ASUS or MSI, they may have to wait months to get a laptop with Intel’s latest chips, while more flexible buyers could get newer hardware sooner.
It also makes comparisons tricky. Some laptops may seem better simply because they launch earlier, even if similar models are still on the way. In this case, timing matters just as much as specs when choosing the right laptop.
Do you ever walk past a person on the streets exhibiting mental health issues and wonder what happened to their family? I have a brother—or at least, I used to. I worry about where he is and hope he is safe. He hasn’t taken my call since 2014.
James and his brother as young children playing together before his brother became sick. James is on the right and his brother is on the left.
When I was 13, I had a very bad day. I was in the back of the car, and what I remember most was the world-crushing sound violently panging off every surface: he was pounding his fists into the steering wheel, and I worried it would break apart. He was screaming at me and my mother, and I remember the web of saliva and tears hanging over his mouth. His eyes were red, and I knew this day would change everything between us. My brother was sick.
Nearly 20 years later, I still have trouble thinking about him. By the time we realized he was mentally ill, he was no longer a minor. The police brought him to a facility for the standard 72-hour hold, where he was diagnosed with paranoid delusional schizophrenia. Concluding he was not a danger to himself or others, they released him.
There was only one problem: at 18, my brother told the facility he was not related to us and that we were imposters. When they let him out, he refused to come home.
My parents sought help and even arranged for medication, but he didn’t take it. Before long, he disappeared.
My brother’s decline and disappearance had nothing to do with the common narratives about drug use or criminal behavior. He was sick. By the time my family discovered his condition, he was already 18 and legally independent from our custody.
The last time he let me visit, I asked about his bed. I remember seeing his dirty mattress on the floor beside broken glass and garbage. I also asked about the laptop my parents had gifted him just a year earlier. He needed the money, he said—and he had maxed out my parents’ credit card.
In secret from my parents, I gave him all the cash I had saved. I just wanted him to be alright.
My parents and I tried texting and calling him; there was no response except the occasional text every few weeks. But weeks turned into months.
Before long, I was graduating from high school. I begged him to come. When I looked in the bleachers, he was nowhere to be seen. I couldn’t help but wonder what I had done wrong.
The last time I heard from him was over the phone in 2014. I tried to tell him about our parents and how much we all missed him. I asked him to be my brother again, but he cut me off, saying he was never my brother. After a pause, he admitted we could be friends. Making the toughest call of my life, I told him he was my brother—and if he ever remembers that, I’ll be there, ready for him to come back.
I’m now 32 years old. I often wonder how different our lives would have been if he had been diagnosed as a minor and received appropriate care. The laws in place do not help families in my situation.
My brother has no social media, and we suspect he traded his phone several years ago. My family has hired private investigators over the years, who have also worked with local police to try to track him down.
One private investigator’s report indicated an artist befriended my brother many years ago. When my mother tried contacting the artist, they said whatever happened between them was best left in the past and declined to respond. My mom had wanted to wish my brother a happy 30th birthday.
My brother grew up in a safe, middle-class home with two parents. He had no history of drug use or criminal record. He loved collecting vintage basketball cards, eating mint chocolate chip ice cream, and listening to Motown music. To my parents, there was no smoking gun indicating he needed help before it was too late.
The next time you think about a person screaming outside on the street, picture their families. We need policies and services that allow families to locate and support their loved ones living with mental illness, and stronger protections to ensure that individuals leaving facilities can transition into stable care. Current laws, including age-based consent rules, the limits of 72-hour holds, and the lack of step-down or supported housing options, leave too many families without resources when a serious diagnosis occurs.
Governments and lawmakers need to do better for people like my brother. As someone who thinks about him every day, I can tell you the burden is too heavy to carry alone.
James Finney-Conlon is a concerned brother and mental health advocate. He can be reached at [email protected].
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.