Wise debuts on Nasdaq as London fintech applies for US banking charter and Federal Reserve master account



TL;DR

Wise began trading on Nasdaq under ticker WSE after moving its primary listing from London. The fintech processed 243 billion dollars in cross-border volume last year and is applying for a US banking charter and Federal Reserve master account as London’s stock market continues to lose its biggest tech companies.

 

Wise began trading on Nasdaq on Monday under the ticker WSE. Shares opened at 15.96 dollars. The London-founded fintech, which went public on the London Stock Exchange in July 2021 via a direct listing that valued it at 11 billion dollars, has moved its primary listing to New York while keeping a secondary listing in London. Nearly 91 per cent of class A shareholders voted in favour of the move. The company will now report in US dollars under US GAAP. It is not just changing exchanges. It is changing countries.

The Nasdaq listing is the most visible part of a broader American migration. Wise has applied for a national trust bank charter from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, with the proposed entity, Wise National Trust, based in Austin, Texas. If approved, the company intends to seek a master account at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, which would let Wise clear and settle US dollar payments directly through the Fed’s rails, including FedNow. A fintech that began by making international bank transfers cheaper is rebuilding itself as an American financial institution.

The numbers

For the fiscal year ended 31 March 2026, Wise processed 243 billion dollars in cross-border volume, an increase of 31 per cent year over year. Net revenue was 2.5 billion dollars, up 19 per cent. Transaction revenue grew 22 per cent to 1.9 billion dollars, split between 1.3 billion in cross-border revenue and 600 million in card and other revenue. Card revenue grew 34 per cent, the fastest-growing segment.

Active customers reached 18.9 million, up 21 per cent. Customer holdings in Wise accounts climbed 40 per cent to 39 billion dollars. Seventy-five per cent of payments are now delivered instantly, up from 65 per cent a year ago. The company guided its income before tax margin toward the top of its 13 to 16 per cent target range, including the costs of the Nasdaq listing itself. Wise saved its customers more than 3.3 billion dollars in fees during the year, a figure the company uses to illustrate the pricing gap between its service and traditional bank transfers.

The market capitalisation is approximately 14 billion dollars. That is a premium to its 2021 direct listing price but below the levels implied by comparable US-listed fintechs. The move to Nasdaq is, in part, a bet that American investors will pay more for a company growing revenue at 19 per cent, processing a quarter of a trillion dollars annually, and expanding into banking.

The migration

CEO and co-founder Kristo Kaarmann was blunt about why Wise left London. “We have current shareholders who would like to own more, but they can’t, because there is not enough trading volume for them in our shares,” he said.

Major investors including Peter Thiel, Andreessen Horowitz, and Baillie Gifford had shown interest since the 2021 listing but were constrained by London’s liquidity. The US has the world’s deepest and most liquid capital markets. London does not.

The national trust bank charter application, filed in June 2025, is the more consequential move. A charter gives Wise a single federal regulator and federal legitimacy.

A Fed master account would give it direct access to the payment rails through which money actually moves in the American financial system, eliminating the need to route transactions through intermediary banks. Fed Governor Chris Waller has said publicly that he is exploring a streamlined account structure for newly chartered entities, but no formal framework exists. The charter is not guaranteed. The master account is even less so.

If both are approved, Wise would become one of the few fintechs with direct Fed access, a position that would fundamentally alter its cost structure for US dollar transactions and position it as a competitor not just to other fintechs but to the correspondent banking network that currently intermediates cross-border payments. The Austin hub is not a regional office. It is the foundation of a US banking operation.

The exodus

Tech companies have been snubbing the London Stock Exchange for years, but the pace has accelerated. Arm opted for a New York IPO in 2023. CRH, the building materials group, delisted from London entirely after switching its primary listing to New York. Flutter moved its primary listing to New York in 2024 and is now considering dropping London altogether. Darktrace left the London market after a 4.3 billion pound sale to Thoma Bravo. Just Eat quit for Amsterdam. Tui moved to Frankfurt. Ashtead and Indivior are gone or going.

More than 100 billion dollars in market capitalisation has migrated away from the LSE in the past five years. The pattern is consistent: companies list in London, grow, discover that London cannot provide the liquidity, analyst coverage, or valuation multiples they need, and leave. Wise is the latest. It will not be the last. Revolut, valued at 75 billion dollars after a 2025 secondary share sale, has confirmed that its IPO will be on Nasdaq, targeting a valuation of 150 to 200 billion dollars. Klarna listed on the NYSE last year.

McKinsey has warned that Europe’s software sector is at a critical inflection point, with the continent producing more than 280 software companies generating over 100 million euros in annual recurring revenue but struggling to retain them as public companies. The talent, the capital, and the customers are in the United States. The companies follow.

The counterargument

Monzo quit the US to focus on Europe ahead of a London IPO, a decision that suggests not every fintech concludes the American market is worth the cost of entry. Monzo’s board calculated that European expansion offered better unit economics than competing in a US market where customer acquisition costs are higher and regulatory complexity is deeper. The company is preparing to list in London, not New York, betting that a home-market focus is what investors will reward.

Wise is making the opposite bet. Its US business is its largest growth opportunity. The American cross-border payments market is the biggest in the world by volume. A banking charter and Fed access would give Wise structural advantages that no amount of London liquidity could replicate. The question is whether the regulatory path is as clear as the commercial one. Eleven companies filed for or received OCC national trust bank charter approvals in 83 days earlier this year, a wave that includes Circle and Ripple alongside Wise. The Fed’s master account process is slower, more discretionary, and less predictable.

The position

The argument that European startups need their own Nasdaq has been made for years. It has not happened. Instead, the companies that would anchor such an exchange keep leaving for the real one. Wise is now a Nasdaq-listed, Austin-headquartered, US GAAP-reporting company that happens to have been founded in London by two Estonians who were frustrated by the cost of sending money between the UK and Estonia.

The company processes a quarter of a trillion dollars a year. It has 18.9 million active customers. It is applying for a US banking charter. Its co-founder told investors that London could not provide enough liquidity for the shareholders who wanted to buy more. The Nasdaq listing is not the story. The banking charter is not the story. The story is that London built a fintech ecosystem, celebrated it, and is now watching it leave, one listing at a time, for markets that can price it properly.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


When you pick out a phone, you’re also picking out the operating system—that typically means Android or iOS. What if a phone didn’t follow those rules? What if it could run any OS you wanted? This is the story of the legendary HTC HD2.

Microsoft makes a mess with Windows Mobile

The HD2 arrives at an unfortunate time

windows mobile 6.5 Credit: Pocketnow

Officially, the HTC HD2 (HTC Leo) launched in November 2009 with Windows Mobile 6.5. Microsoft had already been working on Windows Phone for a few years at this point, and it was planned to be released in 2009. However, multiple delays forced Microsoft to release Windows Mobile 6.5 as a stopgap update to Windows Mobile 6.1.

Microsoft’s plan for mobile devices was a mess at this time. The HD2 didn’t launch in North America until March 2010—one month after Windows Phone 7 had been announced at Mobile World Congress. Originally, the HD2 was supposed to be upgraded to Windows Phone 7, but Microsoft later decided no Windows Mobile devices would get the new OS.

This left the HD2 stuck between a rock and a hard place. Launched as the final curtain was dropping on one OS, but too early to be upgraded to the next OS. Thankfully, HTC was not just any manufacturer, and the HD2 was not just any phone.

The HD2 was better than it had any right to be

HTC made a beast of a phone

HTC HD2 Credit: HTC

HTC was one of the best smartphone manufacturers of the late 2000s and 2010s. It manufactured the first Android phone, the first Google Pixel phone, and several of the most iconic smartphones of the last two decades. Much of the company’s reputation for premium, high-quality hardware stems from the HD2.

The HD2 was the first smartphone with a 4.3-inch touchscreen—considered huge at the time—and one of the first smartphones with a 1 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon processor. That processor, along with 512GB of RAM, made the HD2 more future-proof than HTC probably ever intended. Phones would be launching with those same specs for the next couple of years.

For all intents and purposes, the HD2 was the most powerful phone on the market. It just so happened to run the most limiting mobile OS of the time. If the software situation could be improved, there was clearly tons of potential.

The phone that could do it all

Android, Windows Phone, Ubuntu, and more

The key to the HD2’s hackability was HTC’s open design philosophy. It had an easily unlockable bootloader, and it could boot operating systems from the NAND flash and SD cards.

First, the community took to righting a wrong and bringing Windows Phone 7 to the HD2. This was thanks to a custom bootloader called “MAGLDR”—Windows Phone 7.5 and 8 would eventually get ported, too. The floodgates had opened, and Windows Phone was the least of what this beast of a phone could do.

Android on the HTC HD2? No problem. Name a version of the OS, and the HD2 had a port of it: 2.2 Froyo, 2.3 Gingerbread, 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, 4.1/2/3 Jelly Bean, 4.4 Kitkat, 5.0 Lollipop, 6.0 Marshmallow, 7.0 Nougat, and 8.1 Oreo. Yes, the HD2 was still getting ports seven years after it launched.

But why stop at Android? The HD2 was ripe for all sorts of Linux builds. Ubuntu—including Ubuntu Touch—, Debian, Firefox OS, and Nokia’s MeeGo were ported as well. The cool thing about the HD2 was that it could dual-boot OS’. You didn’t have to commit to just one system at a time. It was truly like having a PC in your pocket, and the tech community loved it.

Do a web search for “HTC HD2” now, and you’ll find many articles about the phone getting yet another port of an OS. It became a running joke that the HD2 would get new versions of Android before officially supported Android phones did. People called it “the phone that refuses to die,” but it was the community that kept it alive.

The last of its kind

“They don’t make ‘em like they used to”

HTC HD2 close up Credit: TechRepublic

The HTC HD2 was a phone from a very different time. It may have gotten more headlines, but there were plenty of other phones being heavily modded and unofficially upgraded back then. Unlockable bootloaders were much more common, and that created opportunities for enthusiasts.

I can attest to how different it was in the early years of the smartphone boom. My first smartphone was another HTC device, the DROID Eris from Verizon. I have fond memories of scouring the XDA-Developers forums for custom ROMs and installing the latest Kaos builds on a whim during college lectures. Sadly, it’s been many years since I attempted that level of customization.

It’s not all doom and gloom for modern smartphones, though. Long-term support has gotten considerably better than it was back in 2010. As mentioned, the HD2 never officially received Windows Phone 7, and it never got any other updates, either. My DROID Eris stopped getting updates a mere eight months after release.

Compare that to phones such as the Samsung Galaxy S26, Google Pixel 10, and iPhone 17, which will all be supported through 2032. You may not be able to dual-boot a completely different OS on these phones, but they won’t be dead in the water in less than a year. We will likely never see a phone like the HTC HD2 from a major manufacturer again.

HTC Droid Eris


A Love Letter to My First Smartphone, the HTC Droid Eris

No, not that DROID.



Source link