Windows rivals to MacBook Neo are arriving – but can you handle their shortcomings?


MacBook Neo

Kerry Wan/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • The MacBook Neo raised the bar for the budget PC market. 
  • Existing budget PCs are inferior to the Neo. 
  • Google may be better positioned to compete with the Neo than Windows is.

Apple’s $599 MacBook Neo was a shock to the Windows PC market — and that’s a good thing. The most affordable MacBook ever brings a new experience to budget laptops, forcing Microsoft and its partners to respond with higher-tier products that can actually compete. 

Let’s face it, the low-end of the PC market is a little dismal: uninspired displays, clunky form factors, and lackluster performance. Sure, you get what you pay for, but the Neo is so popular because it punches above its price point. In fact, since its March 2026 release, it’s been flying off shelves, exceeding Apple’s projected numbers and resulting in a backlog on Apple’s official site

Also: We compared the MacBook Neo to its closest Windows and Chromebook rivals: by the specs

You can bet that Microsoft is working on a follow-up. It’s only been a few months, but we’re starting to see the first PCs at similar prices with similar features, including some rumored developments. We’ve already identified a handful of Windows PCs (and Chromebooks) that could rival the MacBook Neo, but how do they actually hold up?

The side-by-side

PC makers have grown accustomed to releasing products of a certain caliber in this price range. That means lower-resolution displays, less expensive build materials such as plastic rather than aluminum, and modest processor technology. When you put these laptops next to the Neo, the differences are glaring. 

For example, take a look at this laptop that seems like a solid competitor on the surface: LG’s Gram Book 15-inch for, you guessed it: $599. It’s a slick-looking laptop with 8GB of RAM and 512GB of storage — the same as the Neo. 

LG Gram Book 15

Kyle Kucharski/ZDNET

The processors are also comparable. The Gram Book houses an Intel Core Ultra 5 115U in Intel’s Meteor Lake series from 2024, and the Neo’s A18 Pro chip is also from that year. Additionally, the Gram Book has way more ports than the Neo: two USB-Cs, two USB-As, an HDMI, a headphone jack, and a lock slot. 

But the Neo pulls ahead when you look at the details. Its display is smaller, but it has a 2408 x 1506 resolution compared to the 1920 x 1080 FHD on the Gram Book, meaning it will look far sharper. The Gram Book’s matte display is bordered by plastic bezels, whereas the Neo’s all-glass panel feels way more premium. The Neo’s aluminum build also beats out the Gram Book’s mostly plastic chassis. 

Also: Framework Laptop 13 Pro vs. MacBook Neo: These Windows rivals are more similar than expected

And that’s not even mentioning the Apple integrations the Neo has for iPhone users: Messages, FaceTime, Phone Mirroring, and quality-of-life features like AirDrop. Windows’ smartphone app doesn’t compare. 

Google rising?

The Neo certainly converted some Windows users, but it’s not the only alternative to Microsoft’s ubiquitous operating system. Google’s ChromeOS offers a lightweight, streamlined platform with some very affordable devices.

I made the case that the Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14 is the closest Chromebook competitor to the Neo, even doing a few things better. It has a stunning OLED display, a lightweight build, and fantastic keyboard and speakers. Plus, the MediaTek Kompanio ARM-based processor is fast and battery-efficient. But it’s more expensive. The Neo still wins on value. 

Lenovo Chromebook Plus

Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14

Kyle Kucharski/ZDNET

ChromeOS is limited in functionality in comparison to the decades of maturation that MacOS has under its belt. But Google also most certainly has plans to compete. Rumors of a ChromeOS redesign have been circulating for months, and Google has a big opportunity here to go head-to-head with Apple in its smartphone integrations. 

If Google can bring more Android features to ChromeOS, it’ll join Apple with native features that unify the laptop and smartphone experience — something Windows doesn’t have. That could be huge. 

Also: The case for buying a MacBook Neo right now – especially for students

One thing is certain: The MacBook Neo has pushed PC and Chromebook manufacturers to set a new standard for budget devices, and this is great news for consumers. We’ll see if Microsoft can pull off devices in 2026 that can truly rival the king of budget computing. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Vibe coding has taken the development world by storm—and it truly is a modern marvel to behold. The problem is, the vibe coding rush is going to leave a lot of apps broken in its wake once people move on to the next craze. At the end of the day, many of us are going to be left with apps that are broken with no fixes in sight.

A lot of vibe “coders” are really just prompt typers

And they’ve never touched a line of code

An AI robot using a computer with a prompt field on the screen. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

Vibe coding made development available to the masses like never before. You can simply take an AI tool, type a prompt into a text box, and out pops an app. It probably needs some refinement, but, typically, version one is still functional whenever you’re vibe coding.

The problem comes from “developers” who have never written a line of code. They’re just using vibe coding because it’s cool or they think they can make a quick buck, but they really have no knowledge of development—or any desire to learn proper development.

Think of those types of vibe coders as people who realize they can use a calculator and online tools to solve math problems for them, so they try to build a rocket. They might be able to make something work in some way, but they’ll never reach the moon, even though they think they can.

Anyone can vibe code a prototype

But you really need to know what you’re doing to build for the long haul

For those who don’t know what they’re doing, vibe coding is a fantastic way to build a prototype. I’ve vibe coded several projects so far, and out of everything I’ve done, I’ve realized one thing—vibe coding is only as good as the person behind the keyboard. I have spent more time debugging the fruits of my vibe coding than I have actually vibe coding.

Each project that I’ve built with vibe coding could have easily been “viable” within an hour or two, sometimes even less time than that. But, to make something of actual quality, it has always taken many, many hours.

Vibe coding is definitely faster than traditional coding if you’re a one-man team, but it’s not something that is fast by any means if you’re after a quality product. The same goes for continued updates.

I’ve spent the better part of three months building a weather app for iPhone. It’s a simple app, but it also has quite a lot of complex things going on in the background.

It recently got released in the App Store—no small feat at all. But, I still get a few crash reports a week, and I’m constantly squashing bugs and working on new features for the app. This is because I’m planning on supporting the app for a long time, not just the weekend I released it, and that takes a lot more work.

Vibe coders often jump from app to app without thinking of longevity

The app was a weekend project, after all

A relaxed man lounging on an orange beanbag watches as a friendly yellow robot works on a laptop for him, while multiple red exclamation-mark warning icons float around them. Credit: Lucas Gouveia/How-To Geek | ViDI Studio/Shutterstock

I’ve seen it far too often, a vibe coder touting that they built this “complex app” in 48 hours, as if that is something to be celebrated. Sure, it’s cool that a working version of an app was up and running in two days, but how well does it work? How many bugs are still in it? Are there race conditions that cause a random crash?

My weather app has a weird race condition right now I’m tracking down. It crashes, on occasion, when opened from Spotlight on an iPhone. Not every time does that cause a crash, just sometimes.

If a vibe coder’s only goal is to build apps in short amounts of time so they can brag about how fast they built the app, they likely aren’t going to take the time to fix little things like that.

I don’t vibe code my apps that way, and I know many other vibe coders that aren’t that way—but we all started with actual coding, not typing a prompt.


Anyone can be a vibe coder, but not all vibe coders are developers

“And when everyone’s super… no one will be.” – Syndrome, The Incredibles. It might be from a kids’ movie, but it rings true in the era of vibe coding. When everyone thinks they can build an app in a weekend, everyone thinks they’re a developer.

By contrast, not every vibe coder is actually a developer, and that’s the problem. It’s hard to know if the app you’re using was built by someone who has plans to support the app long-term or not—and that’s why there’s going to be a lot of broken apps in the future.

I can see it now, the apps that people built in a weekend as a challenge will simply go without updates. While the app might work for the first few weeks or months just fine, an API update comes along and breaks the app’s compatibility. It’s at that point we’ll see who was vibe coding to build an app versus who was vibe coding just for online clout—and the sad part is, consumers will lose out more often than not with broken apps.



Source link