Like a phoenix rising from the ashes, vinyl has come back from the digital brink, outselling CDs in the U.S. since 2020 to become the leader in physical media sales. You’d have thought that success was solely on the back of nostalgia and reliving the glory days. But you’d be wrong. Generations that grew up streaming have also decided that holding a black petroleum disc in their hands is more valuable than a Spotify subscription.
Fascinatingly, though, CDs are staging their own quiet comeback and are being sought after by a growing audience, not only for their nostalgia factor but also for their affordability and availability when compared to vinyl.
But if you’re starting (or rebuilding) a physical collection in 2026, which format is actually more fun to collect? For me, it’s vinyl—and it has nothing to do with “warmth” or the tired analog-versus-digital argument that audiophiles like to harp on about. It’s about the ritual, the artwork, the scene, and the joy of the hunt. CDs do have real advantages, and I’ll get to those. But they don’t beat vinyl on the thing that matters most: the experience of collecting itself.
The ritual is half the fun
The hands-on ceremony CDs and streaming can’t replicate
Playing a record is like a small ceremony—flipping through to find the one, carefully sliding it out of its sleeve, placing it on the platter, running the dust brush around it, dropping the needle, and enjoying the warm, crackly sound while you dive into the artwork. The deliberate, hands-on engagement is the entire point.
But it’s about musical engagement, too. Vinyl encourages you to listen to a record the way the artist built the album. Side A, side B. You sit with the track order as it was meant to be heard.
Quiz
Iconic album covers
Trivia challenge
From prisms to swimming babies — can you name these legendary albums from a description of their cover art?
RockHip-HopArtClassicsVisuals
This album cover features four men walking in single file across a black-and-white zebra crossing in north London, with one of them famously barefoot. Which album is it?
Correct! The Abbey Road cover was photographed on August 8, 1969, outside EMI Studios. The barefoot man is Paul McCartney, which famously fueled the wild ‘Paul is dead’ conspiracy theory among fans.
Not quite — it’s Abbey Road by The Beatles. The iconic crossing outside EMI Studios in London is still a pilgrimage site for fans today, and the barefoot Paul McCartney sparked one of rock’s most enduring conspiracy theories.
A beam of white light enters a triangular prism and exits as a rainbow spectrum on a stark black background. This minimalist, scientifically inspired image graces which legendary album?
Correct! The Dark Side of the Moon cover was designed by Storm Thorgerson of the design group Hipgnosis. The prism and light refraction concept was actually suggested by guitarist Richard Wright, who wanted something bold and simple.
Not quite — it’s The Dark Side of the Moon by Pink Floyd. The striking prism design was created by Hipgnosis and remains one of the most reproduced images in music history, appearing on everything from t-shirts to tattoos worldwide.
A naked baby boy chases a dollar bill on a fishhook through a swimming pool. No band name or album title appears on the front of the cover. Which 1990s grunge landmark is this?
Correct! The Nevermind cover features Spencer Elden, who was just four months old at the time of the shoot. Elden has since spoken publicly about the image throughout his life and even filed a lawsuit regarding it decades later.
Not quite — it’s Nevermind by Nirvana. The baby in the pool is Spencer Elden, photographed at just four months old. Kurt Cobain reportedly added the fishhook and dollar bill concept as a commentary on capitalist temptation.
A simple yellow banana is printed on a plain white background. Andy Warhol produced the cover, and early pressings of the album encouraged listeners to peel the banana sticker to reveal a flesh-colored one underneath. Which album is this?
Correct! Andy Warhol designed the cover for The Velvet Underground & Nico and served as the album’s producer. The peelable banana on early pressings is now a prized collector’s item, as most owners peeled theirs long ago.
Not quite — it’s The Velvet Underground & Nico. Andy Warhol, who managed and produced the band at the time, designed the iconic banana sleeve. Original copies with an intact peelable sticker are extremely rare and highly sought after by collectors.
A series of jagged white lines resembling a radio wave or mountain range pulse across a solid black background. There is no text, no band photo, and no color — just stark, abstract data visualization. Which post-punk classic does this represent?
Correct! The Unknown Pleasures cover depicts a radio signal from pulsar CP 1919, sourced from a Cambridge astronomy encyclopedia. Designer Peter Saville chose it without the band even seeing it first, and it became one of the most recognizable images in alternative music.
Not quite — it’s Unknown Pleasures by Joy Division. The image is a visualization of radio waves emitted by pulsar CP 1919, and designer Peter Saville discovered it in a Cambridge astronomy textbook. It has since become one of the most tattooed and reproduced images in music culture.
A colorful military-style band poses in front of a collage of over 70 famous figures, wax figures, and cultural icons. The band members themselves wear bright satin uniforms. Which groundbreaking album features this densely packed, theatrical cover?
Correct! Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band features a crowd of over 70 notable figures chosen by the band and designer Peter Blake. The collage took two weeks to assemble and reportedly cost £2,800 — an enormous sum for album art at the time.
Not quite — it’s Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band by The Beatles. The elaborate cover was designed by Peter Blake and Jann Haworth and features figures ranging from Karl Marx to Marilyn Monroe. It won a Grammy Award for Best Album Cover in 1968.
A guitarist is shown mid-smash, slamming his instrument into the stage floor. The image is rendered in a high-contrast, almost newsprint-style photograph with bold pink and green tones. Which punk album does this explosive cover belong to?
Correct! The London Calling cover shows bassist Paul Simonon smashing his Fender Precision Bass at the Palladium in New York City in 1979. Photographer Pennie Smith almost didn’t submit the shot because she felt it was too blurry, but it went on to be named the greatest rock photo of all time by Q magazine.
Not quite — it’s London Calling by The Clash. The photo captures bassist Paul Simonon destroying his bass at New York’s Palladium in 1979. Photographer Pennie Smith thought the image was too out of focus to use, but it was chosen anyway and is now considered one of the greatest rock photographs ever taken.
A group of Black men celebrate joyfully on the steps and lawn of what appears to be the White House, with the central figure holding cash and bottles aloft. A judge appears in the background as if overwhelmed. Which critically acclaimed rap album features this powerful, triumphant cover?
Correct! The To Pimp a Butterfly cover was photographed in front of the White House and directed by Kendrick Lamar himself. The man in the judge’s chair appears to be slumped or overwhelmed, while the group celebrates — a powerful visual statement about race, power, and American identity.
Not quite — it’s To Pimp a Butterfly by Kendrick Lamar. The striking cover was shot in front of the White House and conceived by Kendrick himself. It’s widely interpreted as a commentary on Black triumph, systemic inequality, and the complex relationship between African Americans and American institutions.
Your Score
/ 8
Thanks for playing!
CDs? Pop in the disc, press play, walk away. Meh. The listening experience is closer to streaming than to anything nostalgic or charming, and a quick press of a button is all it takes to skip or shuffle all the thought out of it or skip that deep cut you haven’t given a chance yet. Yes, the sound is cleaner and free of pops and crackles (I personally love that about it). But the experience is more passive and forgettable in a way vinyl just isn’t.
Album art the way it was meant to be seen
The visual experience CDs were never designed for
One of the best arguments for vinyl over CDs can be measured with a ruler. A 12-by-12-inch sleeve gives album art much more visual impact and space for liner notes and lyrics you can actually read. Add to that excellent gatefolds that unfold into panoramas, lyric inserts, posters, and packaging that feels designed instead of compressed.
Some covers simply don’t work when shrunk down to five inches. The prism on Dark Side of the Moon, the pulsar radio waves on Joy Division’s Unknown Pleasures, the infinitely explorable cover of Sgt. Pepper’s (and the legend inside!)—they were built for the bigger canvas. The CD turned them into postage stamps.
And don’t get me started on variant pressings! Collectible splatter pressings, colored vinyl, etched versions, liquid-filled records (The Flaming Lips and Heady Fwends included drops of blood donated by Chris Martin, Kesha, and Sean Lennon!), and more, add to the fun possibilities of vinyl.
I have owned some genuinely beautiful CD box sets, though—themed carrying cases, posters, tchotchkes, the works—and they’re a real pleasure to have. But the format itself was built around shrinking the visual (and sometimes audio) experience, not celebrating it.
A collection that doubles as decor
Vinyl is fun to play and display
In much the same way that a wall of book-lined shelves looks cool (and makes you look smart), a wall or shelving unit of vinyl spines looks even cooler in a living room or dedicated listening room. My 14-year-old likes to prop the records she’s listening to on special vinyl wall shelves in her bedroom or mount them on the wall like art. And crates parked next to a turntable look cool and are functional, too. People who don’t even own a record player are buying vinyl for the look, which tells you everything about its visual pull.
Tall, slender CD towers had their ‘90s moment, and I had several, but they just don’t have the same impact. And those Case Logic CD binders, while convenient for traveling, hide the collection entirely. Even neatly displayed jewel cases don’t carry the same visual weight.
The thrill of the dig
The hunt, the scene, the camaraderie
Bin-flipping at a record store is a sensory experience CDs never matched. The dusty smell, grimy fingers at the end of a long dig through the used bins, the High Fidelity s**t-talk at the counter, the surprise find in the dollar bin, and the staff recommendation that turns into your favorite record of the year. Record Store Day, record fairs, in-store performances—there’s a living scene around vinyl that CDs are only just starting to rebuild, and I honestly hope it gets there.
Even online, hunting Discogs for a specific pressing has a chase quality that regular CD shopping rarely produces. You’re not buying an album so much as tracking down a particular physical object—a specific pressing, country, or year. The hunt is its own reward.
Where CDs have vinyl beat
The practical (jewel) case for the silver disc
To be fair, CDs win on real, practical fronts. Storage is the obvious one. Vinyl collectors are perpetually out of shelf space, so if you’re tight on space, a CD collection might make a lot more sense. And moving day with hundreds of pounds of records is its own special kind of hell. CDs are more likely to survive a cross-country move without warping and are also easier to maintain (no cleaning or anti-static brushes here).
Finding rarities is way easier with CDs, too. The vinyl market is saturated with collectors, and the holy grail pressings that used to turn up in dollar bins are mostly gone or eye-wateringly expensive. CDs are still a buyer’s market, and they’re more durable, so finding one in playable shape is easier. More importantly, entire eras of music—much of the late ’90s and early 2000s—were originally on CD-only. As a 90s kid, plenty of bands I loved never pressed anything on vinyl back then, or they did in such small runs that they’re near impossible to find—Beck’s Mellow Gold, I’m looking at you. The CD isn’t a compromise there; it’s an artifact.
And then there’s cost. Vinyl’s resurgence is a snake eating its own tail—what used to cost $25 new now costs $50+. Used prices have also climbed, and the gear costs more. CDs are the budget-friendly format across the board.
Don’t get me wrong—I’m a music lover, first and foremost, and whatever format gets the sound into your ears the best way for you is the entire point. But while CDs may be easier, cheaper, and more abundant to collect, vinyl is still the fun format I look forward to pulling off the shelf.
Stephan is the sports journalist for the Maple Grove Report.
