UK demands Apple protects children from nude images


The UK government’s child safety crusade now demands that Apple blocks nude images from being seen by children. This is a feature that already exists in iOS, and is on by default.

The government of the United Kingdom has repeatedly demanded that Apple does something to protect children from the dangers of technology. Aside from discussions about blocking young people from social media and forcing stringent age checks on apps and websites, the government is still demanding that big tech firms do more.

Once more, it’s trying to get Apple to block nude imagery from children’s eyes. But this time, the UK really means it.

Speaking at London Tech Week on Monday, Prime Minister Kier Starmer called on tech companies to “introduce device controls that prevent children from sending and receiving sexually explicit images.” He also declared that this is “not an impossible challenge.”

The plans would require Apple, Google, and other major companies to build or enable features on smartphones and tablets to detect nude images, reports Reuters. While such imagery would be blocked for children, adults would be able to view the content using age verification.

A demand before a stronger demand

On Friday, the discussions about the inbound laws included the possibility of CEOs being jailed if they did not act. While the prospect of John Ternus being locked in a UK prison cell is still a possibility, the situation here is not quite that extreme.

For a start, the demand from Starmer is that companies should comply, or else the government will introduce legislation forcing them into compliance. Tech companies should do it voluntarily, in the government’s view, but it will make new laws to make them comply if needed.

From there, the legislation will call for fines and criminal liability for CEOs, which would theoretically be prison time at worst. More realistically, this would mean more fines and stern tutting.

The tech already exists

One thing that does help Apple in this instance is that it has already worked on the problem. It practically has a solution ready-made for this.

Back in 2021, it announced child safety features that would detect child abuse material stored in iCloud, as well as scanning for material on devices. After a lot of complaints regarding privacy and safety, Apple stepped back and thought about things more, and removed the iCloud scanning bit.

However, Communication Safety, a feature that blocked nudes, was implemented in iOS 15.2, and is still available. It’s a feature that is enabled by default for children and teenagers, as well as for adults who haven’t confirmed their age.

Later, in iOS 17, Apple added the Sensitive Content Warning feature, which lets adults block the same sort of content for themselves.

In both cases, the features used on-device machine learning to detect nude photos and videos before anyone could view them.

This meant things like photographs in Messages are automatically blurred, requiring a conscious choice by users to view the material. It also applies to FaceTime calls and video messages, shared photo albums, AirDropped images, and even Contact Posters.

In its current state, Communication Safety practically does what the UK government wants. It blocks the images and video unless the user confirms their age, and by default too.

However, there’s still the question of whether it blocks enough content to appease the lawmakers. At worst, the features may have to be expanded to cover more apps.

An almost sensible case of government overreach

The UK government has always bellowed the need to protect the innocent eyes and thoughts of children. It’s a reasonably reliable political point to press, since anyone who would object to any measures under it would be branded a monster.

Not acknowledging that the feature already exists is yet another example of the lack of knowledge that most government officials have about tech, while still legislating it.

However, the government hasn’t had much luck when it comes to some of its other orders.

The demand for apps and services to validate ages of users was a mess. Some services like Imgur withdrew from the country, while users had to deal with tougher age checks when they accessed not just adult websites, but also everyday apps that aren’t directly adult-leaning at all.

The less said about the whole Discord age-checking security snafu, the better.

Despite the lessons not being learned from that debacle, somehow the UK government has hit upon a demand that’s not entirely horrible. Indeed, it’s a thing that already exists in Apple’s operating systems.

For once, the demanding nanny-state that makes its orders toothless by nagging and pushing the consequences down the road has managed to do something almost reasonable.

It’s still something that curtails the rights and privileges of citizens, and we certainly can’t say the UK government is actually learning to do things in a smarter way.

But it is a step in the right direction. Albeit one that’s seemingly more luck than judgment.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


If you are a book purist, you might scoff when I recommend an e-reader instead of buying physical books, and I won’t blame you. The allure of the smell of pages, the weight of the book in my hands, the whole ritual, is hard to resist. 

However, if you allow me some leeway to convince you, there’s a strong argument to be made against physical books and in favor of using e-readers. So let me make the case for e-readers, because once you understand what you’ve been missing, it’s hard to go back.

Your entire library fits in your bag

This is the most obvious advantage, but it doesn’t get enough credit. I always read more than one book at a time, and carrying two or three physical books around is not realistic. Thick books alone are a chore to carry.

With an e-reader, you carry hundreds of books in a slim package. Switching between titles takes a second. If you travel frequently, this alone is reason enough to make the switch.

A thousand-page hardcover is great for your bookshelf but terrible for your commute.

Fat books are a workout, not a reading experience

If, like me, you are into fantasy books, you know they can be a behemoth to handle. You have to constantly shift how you’re holding it, find a way to keep it open, and somehow also stay comfortable. Thin books are fine, but the moment a book crosses a certain thickness, it starts working against you.

An e-reader weighs the same regardless of whether you’re reading a short novel or a massive fantasy series. That’s it. Whether I am reading The Count of Monte Cristo or the next book in Brandon Sanderson’s The Stormlight Archive series, my Supernote Nomad remains the same. 

Reading at night without waking anyone up

I do a lot of my reading at night, and this is where physical books completely fall apart for me. Lamps and book lights never feel comfortable. The light is never quite right, and if you share a room with someone, the whole setup becomes a problem.

Most e-readers, including Kindles, have a built-in backlight that you can dim to whatever level feels right. You can even switch to warm light mode, making it easier on your eyes. 

I’ve read at 3 AM with the brightness all the way down, and it felt completely natural. No lamp and no squinting required. 

Look up any word without losing your place

English is not my first language, and even for native speakers, encountering an unfamiliar word in the middle of a chapter is common. With a physical book, your options are to grab your phone and look it up, which almost always leads to distraction, or skip it and lose a bit of meaning.

On a Kindle or most other e-readers, you tap the word and the definition appears instantly. You can translate it, add it to a vocabulary list, and get back to reading in seconds. I look up far more words now than I ever did with physical books, and my reading comprehension is genuinely better for it.

Taking notes you’ll actually use later

I used to annotate physical books with a pen, and those notes would just sit there on the page, never to be seen again. Transferring them somewhere useful took more effort than I was ever willing to put in.

With my Supernote Nomad, I can use its Digest feature to clip what I am reading and quickly add any additional handwritten notes. I can then export those notes to Obsidian and process them. 

If you use any e-reader, highlighting a passage and adding a note will take a couple of seconds. Most e-readers also aggregate all your highlights and notes in one place, allowing you to quickly riffle through your notes without flipping pages. 

With physical books, my notes died on the page. With an e-reader, they became something I actually use.

Since these are digital notes, you can process them into your note-taking app to further digest the material.

Books are cheaper and easier to buy

Buying physical books is always more expensive than getting the digital version. Also, since most publishers are phasing out mass-market paperbacks, we are left with trade paperback and hardcover options, which may look better but also cost significantly more.

E-books don’t have that problem. I have purchased several books at less than half the price I would have paid for a physical version. Also, most of the time, e-books are on sale, making them even more affordable. 

And when you find a book you want to read at midnight, you don’t have to wait for a delivery or drive to a store. You buy it and start reading immediately. The convenience is hard to overstate once you get used to it.

Should you switch?

If you love the experience of physical books, the covers, the smell, the shelf aesthetic, that’s a completely valid reason to stick with them. There’s nothing wrong with it. I myself am curating my own bookshelf, and there will always be a place for those special books. 

But for convenience and ease of discovery and reading, I recommend you at least invest in one e-reader. It’s also one of the best times to buy them, as you can get good options around $100

Since these are e-readers, you don’t even need to upgrade them as often as your phone. If you don’t accidentally break them, they can easily last 5-6 years, making them worth the investment.



Source link