TSMC plans a further $100 billion investment in the US


Apple’s main processor supplier TSMC has announced another increase in US investment, saying its new plants will include ones making its most advanced chips.

In May 2026, TSMC announced an additional $20 billion investment in its Arizona plants. Now according to the Financial Times, the company has revealed plans to build four more plants, costing a total of $100 billion.

Howard Lutnick, US commerce secretary, said that the extra investment would “create tens of thousands of American jobs and bring advanced semiconductor manufacturing back to America.”

The investment in new plants will reportedly include factories making “2nm and below” processors, plus advanced packaging. TSMC’s first Arizona plant is believed to be producing 4-nanometer wafers, though there were already plans for 2nm manufacturing by 2030.

In 2025, it was reported that TSMC’s Arizona plants were producing the A16 processor. That was used in the iPhone 14 and iPhone 15 ranges, which have not been in production for some time.

TSMC has not announced a schedule for the new investment. CEO CC Wei said that “we will try to speed it up as fast as possible,” but that it depends on “the market situation and customer demand.”

This announcement increases TSMC’s total US investment to $265 billion, and follows the company’s latest financial earnings report. That report says TSMC profits rose 77% and the company attributes this to the demand for AI processors.

CEO Wei said he believes that demand for AI processors will remain very strong until 2029-2030.

It is this demand that is causing the global shortage of chips, and consequently a drive to add new production facilities. There is also a political element for TSMC, which as the CIA privately briefed Tim Cook, has reasons to fear a Chinese invasion of Taiwan by 2027.

There has also been continued pressure from the Trump administration to reshore manufacturing. One of the reasons Apple secured an exemption from Trump’s tariffs is said to be a commitment to buy processors from US-based Intel.

That deal is said to be a multi-year commitment. It follows the Trump administration investing in Intel in return for shares.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


YouTube has an AI slop problem, and its crackdown is catching legitimate creators in the crossfire. Faceless channels, where no human host ever appears on screen, have existed for years and are not inherently AI-generated.

Many are run by solo creators who simply prefer to stay anonymous. The problem is that AI tools made it easy to flood the platform with low-effort faceless content at scale, and YouTube’s algorithm is now penalizing the format as a whole.

How bad is the AI slop problem on YouTube?

A Kapwing study found that roughly 21% of the first 500 videos recommended to a new YouTube account were classified as AI slop, while 33% fell into a broader brainrot category. The problem extends to children, too, as more than 40% of YouTube Shorts recommended to kids in a 15-minute session contained low-quality AI content.

YouTube’s response has been to tweak its algorithm to favor videos with real human faces on camera, which is hitting faceless creators even when their content is entirely human-made.

How is YouTube tackling its AI slop problem?

YouTube is now testing a new pop-up on mobile that asks viewers to rate whether a video feels like AI slop, on a scale from “not at all” to “extremely.” The idea sounds reasonable, but crowdsourcing AI detection has real problems. People are bad at spotting AI content, and they are getting worse at it as AI capabilities continue to improve.

There are also legitimate concerns that YouTube could use this viewer feedback as training data for its own AI models, potentially making future AI-generated content even harder to spot.

🚨 Did you just see what YouTube did?

YouTube isn’t banning AI slop.. They’re making you label it so they can train their next model to not look like slop.

Read that again…

You flag the bad AI content. YouTube collects it. Google feeds it into Veo 4… Then next year their… https://t.co/8UC2J3mjjv pic.twitter.com/mIrTChqC1b

— Tuki (@TukiFromKL) March 17, 2026

Meanwhile, faceless creators are scrambling to adapt. According to The Hollywood Reporter, some are hiring cheap on-camera hosts through platforms like Fiverr and Upwork. Others are doubling down on niche educational content, which has held up better than broad content farms.

The AI text-to-video space is still valued at enormous sums, with Higgsfield AI alone sitting at $1 billion, but on YouTube, the math for faceless creators is getting harder to work out every month.



Source link