This rugged Windows tablet handles mud and rain – but didn’t impress with the basics


img-4304.jpg

pros and cons

Pros

  • Ruggedized package that’s ideal for heavy outdoor use.
  • Runs Windows 11 and Copilot+ features.
  • Lots of expansion possibilities.
Cons

  • Expensive.
  • Heavy.
  • Screen is a bit dim in bright light.

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


While laptops and PCs dominate the office space, they’re not always the best form factor for taking compute power out of the comfort and safety of the workspaces. This is where tablets come into play. They’re not only more portable than laptops or desktops, they’re far easier to ruggedize.

Sure, performance isn’t as good as what we’d expect from a more traditional system, but thanks to modern processors, the power that can be packed into a tablet is still pretty amazing.

Also: Cable, cords, and adapters I never throw away – and why these accessories are worth saving

The Getac G140 is a tablet that’s been built from the ground up to be powerful enough to run Microsoft’s Copilot+ AI tools, but also tough enough to survive rough handling by Mother Nature.

Best tablet deals of the week

Deals are selected by the CNET Group commerce team, and may be unrelated to this article.

The specs

The G140 features a 14-inch 1920 x 1200 IPS LCD touchscreen and an AMD processor from the Ryzen AI 5 and Ryzen AI 7 lines, even the Pro variants, between 16GB and 64GB of DDR5 RAM, and up to 2TB of PCIe NVMe SSD storage.

Also: I’ve tested dozens of power stations – here’s how I’m preparing for summer blackouts

Powering this are dual hot-swappable batteries, a bunch of built-in ports, a DisplayPort, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A port, Gigabit Ethernet, and audio in/out, along with the option to add HDMI 2.1 and two USB 2.0 Type-A ports. On the top of the tablet is a port that accepts an optional barcode reader, serial port, HF RFID reader, or USB 2.0 Type-A port.

All the ports are well protected from the elements.

All the ports are well protected from the elements.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Options galore. There’s also the obligatory front- and rear-facing cameras, with the front-facing camera featuring a privacy/protection cover that slides over it when you want privacy or worry something’s going to scratch the lens.

My review unit featured an AMD Ryzen AI 7 Pro CPU with a Radeon 860M GPU, 32GB of RAM, and 500GB of storage, which is near the top of the G140 spec sheet.

Built to last

All this tech is packed into a shell that’s been designed to pass MIL-STD-810H environmental tests and MIL-STD-461G electromagnetic compatibility tests, and is rated IP66, so it’s fully protected against dust ingress and high-pressure water jets from any direction.

Rain is nothing for the G140.

Rain is nothing for the G140.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The tablet measures 13.3 x 9.4 x 0.9 inches and weighs 3.95 pounds, so it’s a pretty hefty weight to hold in one hand. It’s also certified for safe use in hazardous locations with explosive atmospheres, as well as in marine environments where salt fog and corrosion are a real problem. Overall, it’s ideal for harsh outdoor conditions.

The question of price

All this hardware runs Windows 11 Pro, and it runs very smoothly, as I’d expect for a tablet that’ll set you back as much as $4,000. It also runs Microsoft Copilot+ features smoothly thanks to the Ryzen AI chip having an NPU capable of running at 50 TOPS.

Also: This ‘cardputer’ sits between the Raspberry Pi and Flipper Zero – but it’s uniquely better

But things take a bit of a dive when we look at the benchmarks. In Cinebench 2024, it scored a 433 in multi-core performance and a 92 in single-core performance. This isn’t all that impressive (my iPhone 17 blows it away), but remember that it is a full, no-compromise Windows system you can hold in your hand. Almost — it does weigh about the same as a watermelon.

The Cinebench 2024 score is also at the low end.

The Cinebench 2024 score is also at the low end.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Pros and cons

Performance-wise, I like the G140. Sure, it’s an underdog when it comes to benchmark results and won’t win any bragging rights. But it’s fast enough, and that’s what counts. It’s built for work, not running AAA games. The screen is also just good enough, even though at 1,000 nits, it’s a little bit on the dim side in bright sunlight. 

This could be down to the protective film that Getac has applied to the display, but it has very wide horizontal and vertical viewing angles, which is great, and does a great job of resisting smudges and dirt. I also like the hot-swappable batteries. This is great for situations where you can’t be tied to a charging cord.

The hot-swappable batteries are a great idea.

The hot-swappable batteries are a great idea.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Ruggedness is also top-notch. I’m not going to drive a mini digger over a this tablet, but I did give it a very good workout. It got used in the rain, put down in dirt and mud, dropped, and abused in a way that these sorts of devices get abused.

The downside of the ruggedness is the weight. It’s a hefty bit of kit. Getac has preempted this with various palm holders for the G140, but there’s no getting past how heavy it is to hold. 

Also: I set up a $4 router reboot timer, and it’s made my internet reliably faster

It’s also big. I know that’s a bit obvious — I mean, it is a 14-inch tablet — but this is bigger than you expect thanks to the oversized bezel and bumpers. It’s pretty much the size of two 16-inch MacBook Pros stacked on top of each other.

The buttons on the bezel take some getting used to as well. I found myself constantly pressing them by accident, and it wasn’t something that got better with more use. I could disable the buttons, but that seemed like admitting defeat.

I just couldn't get used to the placement of these buttons.

I just couldn’t get used to the placement of these buttons.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

ZDNET’s buying advice

If you need a rugged Windows 11 Pro tablet that you can leave in the rain, drop into mud, and use on an oil rig without worrying about salt eating it or causing an explosion, the Getac G140 is perfect. But this is a niche device. It’s expensive, absolutely massive, and performance is limited. 

You can definitely buy cheaper, lighter, and more powerful tablets, but these would quit at the first drop or rain shower. You can also find cheaper rugged tablets, but you lose on performance and all the optional extras that you can add.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Whoop MG on arm

The Whoop is one of the devices that Google’s rumored screenless health tracker would compete with.

Nina Raemont/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways 

  • Google is poised to unveil a Whoop dupe soon. 
  • Steph Curry teased a screenless health band on his Instagram. 
  • Here’s what I’d like to see from a Google fitness band. 

Could Google’s latest fitness tracker return to its original, screenless Fitbit form? All signs say yes. Google has teased a screenless, Whoop-adjacent health tracker with the help of basketball star Steph Curry. A recent Instagram post from Curry shows him wearing a screenless, fabric band around his wrist, and the accompanying caption promotes “a new relationship with your health.” 

There are scant confirmed details on this next device, but rumors suggest the band will be called “Fitbit Air.” 

Also: I replaced my Whoop with a rival fitness band that has no monthly fees – and it’s nearly as good

Why a screenless fitness band? And why now? Google’s new device could be taking interest away from popular fitness brand Whoop. Whoop’s fitness band is on the more luxurious end of the health wearables spectrum. The company offers three subscription tiers, starting at $199, $239, and $359 annually. Google’s device, on the other hand, is rumored to be more affordable with the option to upgrade to Fitbit Premium. 

Google has the opportunity to make an accessibly priced fitness band with the rumored Fitbit Air and breathe new life into its older Fitbit product lineup, which hasn’t been updated in years. 

What I’m expecting 

Here’s what I expect to see and what I hope Google prioritizes in this new health tracker.

Given Fitbit’s bare-bones approach to fitness tracking, I assume Google will emphasize an affordable, accessible fitness band with the Fitbit Air. Most Fitbit products cost between $130 and $230, so I’m expecting this band to be on the lower end of that price range. I’d also expect Fitbit to give users a free trial of Fitbit Premium. 

Also: T-Mobile is practically giving away the Apple Watch Series 11 – here’s how to get one

A long, long, long battery life 

A smartwatch with a bright screen and integrations with an accompanying smartphone consumes a lot of power. That’s why some of the best smartwatches on the market have a middling battery life of one to two days, tops. 

A fitness band, on the other hand, is screenless. That makes the battery potential on this Fitbit Air double — or even triple — that of Google’s smartwatches.

Also: I use this 30-second routine to fix sluggish Samsung smartwatches – and it works every time

The Fitbit Inspire 3 has around 10 days of battery life — with a watch display. I hope the screenless Fitbit Air has at least 10 days of battery life, plus some change. Two weeks of battery life would be splendid. 

In addition to usage time, I also hope that a screenless fitness tracker addresses some of the issues Fitbit Inspire users have complained about. Many Inspire users report that the device’s screen died after a year of use. They could still access data through the app, but the screen was dysfunctional. Despite being a more affordable Google health tracker, the Fitbit Air should last users for a few years without any hardware issues — or at least I hope it does. 

Fitbit’s classically accurate heart rate measurements 

As Google’s Performance Advisor and the athlete teasing Google’s next device, Steph Curry is sending the message that this new device, one that offers wearers “a new relationship with your health,” will be built for athletes and exercise enthusiasts. I hope this device homes in on accurate heart rate measurements and advanced sensing, as other Fitbit devices do. 

Also: I walked 3,000 steps with my Apple Watch, Google Pixel, and Oura Ring – this tracker was most accurate

Like Whoop, I hope the insights the Fitbit Air provides are performance- and recovery-driven. Whoop grew in popularity for exactly this reason. Not only do Whoop users get their sleep and recovery score, but they also see, through graphs and health data illustrations, how their daily exercise exertion, strain, and sleep interact with and inform each other. 

I’m assuming that Fitbit Premium, with its AI-powered health coach and revamped app design, may do a lot of the heavy lifting for sleep and recovery insights with this new product. 

Also: Are AI health coach subscriptions a scam? My verdict after testing Fitbit’s for a month

But I also hope Google adds a few features on the app’s home screen that specifically target athletic strain and recovery, beyond the steps, sleep, readiness, and weekly exercise percentage already available on the Fitbit app’s main screen. 

Lots of customizable, distinct bands 

I hope the Fitbit Air is cheap — and the accompanying bands are even cheaper. If the rumors of affordability are true, then I’d hope Fitbit sells bands that can be worn with the device that match users’ styles and color preferences at a similarly affordable and accessible price point. Curry wears a gray-orange band in his teaser. I hope the colorways for this device are bold, patterned, and easily distinguishable from rival fitness bands. 





Source link