This could be the final form of the iPhone 18 Pro, and it’s expectedly boring


We’re already in May, which means the next big iPhone season is slowly getting closer. In just a few months, iPhone 18 Pro will finally step into the spotlight, and I can’t deny it, I still get excited every year when a new iPhone launch approaches. There’s something fun about the buildup, the leaks, the keynote anticipation, and all the speculation that comes with it.

But recently, a new video from Jon Prosser at Front Page Tech gave us what could be an early look at the upcoming Pro model, and honestly, it left me a little underwhelmed. If these renders are even somewhat accurate, the phone feels way too familiar. It does not look bad or unattractive; it just looks safe in a way that makes it hard to feel excited about. At first glance, it barely feels like a new-generation iPhone at all.

The circle of iPhone life continues

According to Jon Prosser, the biggest visual change on the iPhone 18 Pro could be a slightly smaller Dynamic Island compared to last year’s Pro model. And that is where the “new design” conversation seemingly begins and ends. Earlier rumors about under-display Face ID also do not appear to be happening this year, so from the front, the phone may end up looking almost identical to what we already have today.

Honestly, that is the part that feels a little disappointing. Every year, there’s hope that Apple will surprise us with something visually fresh, something that makes the new iPhone feel exciting the moment you pick it up. But if these leaks are accurate, the iPhone 18 Pro seems more like a careful refinement. A smaller Dynamic Island is nice, sure, but it hardly feels like the kind of change people will notice outside tech circles.

As for colors, Prosser claims Apple could introduce shades like light blue, dark cherry, dark gray, and silver this year. Around the back, the phone is still expected to pack 48MP camera sensors across the board, but the real highlight may not be the megapixel count. According to him, Apple could finally bring a variable-aperture main camera to the iPhone, allowing the lens to adjust how much light it lets in based on the scene. In real-world use, that could translate to sharper shots, better low-light performance, and more natural-looking depth in photos.

The engine got louder, but the road still looks the same

That said, there may also be a small compromise. The Camera Control button reportedly supports only pressure-sensitive inputs this time, possibly because Apple wants to cut manufacturing costs. So while the company could be pushing camera hardware forward, it may also be simplifying a few things behind the scenes.

Internally, the iPhone 18 Pro is rumored to run on Apple’s new A20 Pro chip, which Prosser says could be around 50% faster and 30% more power efficient than the previous generation. Battery upgrades, however, seem fairly modest. The Pro Max model may reportedly move from a 5,100mAh battery to a slightly larger 5,200mAh unit, which does not exactly scream “massive leap.” One genuinely interesting addition, though, could be Apple’s new C2 modem. The Pro models are said to support satellite-based 5G connectivity, which sounds futuristic.

But perhaps the most telling part of Prosser’s leak is that even he seemed more excited about Apple’s rumored foldable device, supposedly called the iPhone Ultra. According to him, that is the product expected to truly steal attention this year. And honestly, that says a lot. The iPhone 18 Pro sounds polished, powerful, and predictably premium, but it also feels like another lap around a very familiar track.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Vibe coding has taken the development world by storm—and it truly is a modern marvel to behold. The problem is, the vibe coding rush is going to leave a lot of apps broken in its wake once people move on to the next craze. At the end of the day, many of us are going to be left with apps that are broken with no fixes in sight.

A lot of vibe “coders” are really just prompt typers

And they’ve never touched a line of code

An AI robot using a computer with a prompt field on the screen. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

Vibe coding made development available to the masses like never before. You can simply take an AI tool, type a prompt into a text box, and out pops an app. It probably needs some refinement, but, typically, version one is still functional whenever you’re vibe coding.

The problem comes from “developers” who have never written a line of code. They’re just using vibe coding because it’s cool or they think they can make a quick buck, but they really have no knowledge of development—or any desire to learn proper development.

Think of those types of vibe coders as people who realize they can use a calculator and online tools to solve math problems for them, so they try to build a rocket. They might be able to make something work in some way, but they’ll never reach the moon, even though they think they can.

Anyone can vibe code a prototype

But you really need to know what you’re doing to build for the long haul

For those who don’t know what they’re doing, vibe coding is a fantastic way to build a prototype. I’ve vibe coded several projects so far, and out of everything I’ve done, I’ve realized one thing—vibe coding is only as good as the person behind the keyboard. I have spent more time debugging the fruits of my vibe coding than I have actually vibe coding.

Each project that I’ve built with vibe coding could have easily been “viable” within an hour or two, sometimes even less time than that. But, to make something of actual quality, it has always taken many, many hours.

Vibe coding is definitely faster than traditional coding if you’re a one-man team, but it’s not something that is fast by any means if you’re after a quality product. The same goes for continued updates.

I’ve spent the better part of three months building a weather app for iPhone. It’s a simple app, but it also has quite a lot of complex things going on in the background.

It recently got released in the App Store—no small feat at all. But, I still get a few crash reports a week, and I’m constantly squashing bugs and working on new features for the app. This is because I’m planning on supporting the app for a long time, not just the weekend I released it, and that takes a lot more work.

Vibe coders often jump from app to app without thinking of longevity

The app was a weekend project, after all

A relaxed man lounging on an orange beanbag watches as a friendly yellow robot works on a laptop for him, while multiple red exclamation-mark warning icons float around them. Credit: Lucas Gouveia/How-To Geek | ViDI Studio/Shutterstock

I’ve seen it far too often, a vibe coder touting that they built this “complex app” in 48 hours, as if that is something to be celebrated. Sure, it’s cool that a working version of an app was up and running in two days, but how well does it work? How many bugs are still in it? Are there race conditions that cause a random crash?

My weather app has a weird race condition right now I’m tracking down. It crashes, on occasion, when opened from Spotlight on an iPhone. Not every time does that cause a crash, just sometimes.

If a vibe coder’s only goal is to build apps in short amounts of time so they can brag about how fast they built the app, they likely aren’t going to take the time to fix little things like that.

I don’t vibe code my apps that way, and I know many other vibe coders that aren’t that way—but we all started with actual coding, not typing a prompt.


Anyone can be a vibe coder, but not all vibe coders are developers

“And when everyone’s super… no one will be.” – Syndrome, The Incredibles. It might be from a kids’ movie, but it rings true in the era of vibe coding. When everyone thinks they can build an app in a weekend, everyone thinks they’re a developer.

By contrast, not every vibe coder is actually a developer, and that’s the problem. It’s hard to know if the app you’re using was built by someone who has plans to support the app long-term or not—and that’s why there’s going to be a lot of broken apps in the future.

I can see it now, the apps that people built in a weekend as a challenge will simply go without updates. While the app might work for the first few weeks or months just fine, an API update comes along and breaks the app’s compatibility. It’s at that point we’ll see who was vibe coding to build an app versus who was vibe coding just for online clout—and the sad part is, consumers will lose out more often than not with broken apps.



Source link