The LA Metro Attack Wasn’t Hacktivism. It Was a State Operation With a Costume On.


The LA Metro Attack Wasn’t Hacktivism. It Was a State Operation With a Costume On.

Pierluigi Paganini
May 27, 2026

Iran’s “hacktivist” group Ababil of Minab, which hit LA Metro and wiped terabytes of data, is forensically linked to Iran’s intelligence service MOIS.

In late March, a group calling itself Ababil of Minab posted videos and screenshots online claiming it had broken into the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, wiped hundreds of terabytes of data, and stolen more than a terabyte of files. It framed itself as a pro-Iran hacktivist collective. Researchers at Israeli firm Gambit Security took one look at the infrastructure and didn’t buy it.

LA Metro confirmed the breach on April 2, 2026. The attack forced the authority to check hundreds of servers for signs of compromise before bringing them back online. Rail and bus services kept running, but internal operations were disrupted for weeks. The timing of the intrusion is visible in the attacker’s own footage: at 03:37 AM on March 17, LA Metro posted on X that service alerts were delayed and riders couldn’t load fares on the TAP Mobile App. That tweet went up hours after the attacker had already deleted virtual machines from LA Metro’s vCenter environment. The destruction wasn’t random clicking.

“The actor carried out destruction using two methods: scripted automation and hands-on keyboard. In the scripted mode, the operator runs a program that iterates through an inventory and issues the destructive command against each entry.” reads the report published by Gambit Security. “In the interactive mode, the operator opens the management consoles and operating system tools a legitimate administrator would use and deletes resources by pointing and clicking through them.”

The attacker opened vCenter, selected virtual machines, issued Power Off followed by Delete from Disk, and watched the task queue confirm each deletion. Then they moved to Windows guest VMs, opened Disk Management, and deleted partitions one by one, clicking through the OS warnings.

LA Metro wasn’t the only target. The same campaign hit the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority, a Saudi maintenance company called UNIMAC, and Vyncs, a consumer GPS vehicle tracking service. At UNIMAC, the attackers formatted storage volumes, deleted them, then created new volumes named “Minab” in their place. Not subtle. At Vyncs, they ran a custom Python script called main.py that iterated through a hardcoded list of 58 SQL Server instances, dropped every user database on each one, then manually deleted backup files and finally deleted the Windows operating system folder itself. The RDP session dropped mid-deletion, which confirmed the destruction had worked.

The attacker also used ChatGPT to refine the destruction script. In a video the group published, a browser tab briefly exposed a ChatGPT conversation where the operator was asking for help filtering system databases out of the enumeration so that DROP DATABASE would only hit user data. The recommended code pattern matched exactly what the script did at runtime. It’s a mundane detail, but it’s notable: an Iran-linked intelligence operation using consumer AI tooling to fix a bug in its wiper script.

The attribution to Iran came through forensic analysis of the attacker’s staging server. Gambit found that files had been transferred onto it from a second IP address, 31.172.87.20, which had previously served an SSL certificate for nefeshhope[.]com.

That domain was used in August 2025 as a fake trauma support portal targeting IDF soldiers, impersonating a legitimate mental health service to harvest personal information and deliver malware. The Israeli National Cyber Directorate took it down and attributed it to a known Iranian group. Additional analysis by ClearSky Cyber Security and researcher Simon Kenin linked the infrastructure to Black Shadow, an Iranian group operating on behalf of MOIS, Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security.

“Our investigation found that Ababil of Minab is unlikely to be a new, standalone hacktivist crew, as they claim.” continues the report. “Forensic evidence ties the operation to infrastructure and activity associated with Black Shadow, an Iran-linked group, which was attributed by the Israel National Cyber Directorate to Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security.”

Beyond the four public incidents, Gambit also identified additional victims on the attacker’s staging infrastructure that Ababil of Minab chose not to publicize.

“The victims include an Israeli organization in the media sector, an Israeli higher education institution, a Turkish insurance brokerage, and several additional websites across the restaurant, culture, digital services, and news sectors.” states the report.

Against these targets, Gambit found evidence of data exfiltration but not destruction — suggesting the group was selectively publicizing the most dramatic attacks while quietly looting others.

The exfiltration tooling is worth noting. The attackers built a custom Flask-based receiver in Python to collect stolen data in encrypted chunks, with endpoints for starting sessions, resuming interrupted transfers, and validating chunk hashes. The encryption used AES-CBC, but the key and IV were sent in the same POST request as the encrypted data, which means it protected nothing against anyone monitoring the traffic. They also deployed a bespoke C++ tool internally named FileFiend that could enumerate local drives and SMB shares and send files to a hardcoded server. A developer source path leaked in the binary strings: C:\Users\casio\Desktop\uploader v3. Someone named casio built this on their desktop.

The hacktivist branding was cover. The infrastructure, the tooling, the targeting pattern, and the prior activity all point to a state intelligence operation that put on a persona to create ambiguity and complicate attribution. It worked for a few weeks. It didn’t hold up to a serious look.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, LA Metro)







Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Modern displays are amazing when it comes to detail, brightness, color, and all the ingredients that make for an impressive picture—except motion clarity.

CRT screens are still the king of motion clarity, but plasma flat-panel screens hold a respectable second place, and in many ways I still miss my old 720p 51-inch plasma TV and the crisp motion I gave up by switching to a 4K LCD.

Plasma solved motion the “right” way

Plasma displays didn’t just show an image—they flashed it.

While they operate on different principles, CRTs and plasma TVs have a few things in common. First, the phosphors used by CRTs and plasma displays are the same. Second, because these phosphors fade quickly, they need to be continuously refreshed.

In a CRT, the electron beam scanning from the top to the bottom of the screen achieves this, and in a plasma, a high-speed electric pulse does the same. Because of this rapid pulse-and-fade, these screen technologies have crisp perceptual motion, since our brains tend to interpret moving images that don’t pulse as “smearing” across our retinas.

The pulsing nature of plasma technology isn’t the only reason for its better motion reproduction. These screens also have very low latency and very fast pixel response times. Combined, it’s not quite as good as CRT motion handling, but it’s significantly better than LCD and OLED technology, even today.

Modern TVs rely on sample-and-hold—and that’s the problem

Stand and deliver blurry images

Blur Busters UFO Test

Modern LCD and OLED televisions are “sample and hold” technologies. They can hold each frame of video perfectly for the entire duration of that frame without deviating in brightness and then instantly snap to the next frame without any dipping to black in-between.

On paper, this sounds like a good thing, but your eyes don’t stay still when tracking motion. As they follow a moving object, the image being held on screen effectively drags across your retina, creating the perception of blur. Even if the panel itself is perfectly sharp.

You might not even realize how blurry motion is on modern displays if all you’ve ever seen with the naked eye is an LCD or plasma. However, if you see a CRT or plasma in person, the difference is quite striking.

The sample and hold issue means that no matter how much you increase the refresh rate, that type of blur persists. It’s why my 85Hz CRT monitor is clearly less blurry in motion than my 240Hz LCD monitor. It’s especially apparent when you’re playing 2D games that scroll the entire screen, with LCDs or OLEDs smearing the image in a way that gives me a bit of a headache if I’m being honest.

Playing Diablo 2 on a CRT. Credit: Sydney Louw Butler/Shutterstock.com

It creates this weird situation where a modern TV can be incredibly sharp in a freeze frame but somehow look softer than a lower-resolution display that isn’t sample and hold as soon as you press play.

Motion interpolation is a workaround, not a solution

It’s an abomination, that’s what it is

One of the “fixes” that TV makers came up with to reduce unwanted motion blur is a technology known as frame interpolation, or more commonly “motion smoothing.” Here an algorithm creates fake frames that guess at what the middle step of motion would look like if it were captured. This creates a high frame-rate video output, which we see as smoother and more crisp.

While this doesn’t take away sample-and-hold blur, it does improve motion clarity. Unfortunately, it also destroys the intended frame rate that shows and movies were meant to be seen at. It’s also useless for video games, because it introduces an enormous amount of input lag. NVIDIA’s DLSS technology is also frame interpolation, but it works for games because of several mitigations NVIDIA put into the technology. These measures don’t exist on TVs.

While some people think motion smoothing isn’t all bad, TV makers are no longer activating it by default as much anymore, and my advice is to always turn it off because the trade-offs are just not worth it.

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 9.21.03 AM

7/10

Brand

TCL

Display Size

85-inches

The 2025 model TCL QM6K Google TV delivers a stunningly clear and bright picture with a new Mini-LED panel, improved local dimming zones, Dolby Vision IQ, and a neat new Halo Control system for improved visuals. Get this TV and elevate your living room. 


Black frame insertion tries to recreate plasma—but comes with trade-offs

Who turned out the lights?

The other trick sample-and-hold screens have to mimic what CRTs and plasma TVs do naturally is called BFI, or Black Frame Insertion. As the name suggests, the display inserts a full black frame between every original frame. This provides an instant and dramatic increase in motion clarity. However, it also has a big impact on brightness. As much as half of the light is now gone, so the image is much dimmer. Pushing overall brightness to compensate makes things hotter and more energy-hungry.

Some BFI implementations cause visible flicker, for which I personally have no tolerance at all, but the biggest problem here is that BFI doesn’t have the smooth pulsing roll off of the phosphors used in CRTs and plasma.


The future might circle back—but we’re not there yet

That might be changing, however, because a new generation of LCDs can leverage the power of multi-zone backlight technology to strobe the backlight across the screen in a way that mimics a CRT scanline.

NVIDIA’s G-SYNC Pulsar has received rave reviews from the biggest motion blur haters, and I sincerely hope that a similar technology becomes standard in TVs going ahead, so we can go back to enjoying the crisp motion we used to have without all the compromises.



Source link