The internet keeps telling you to 3D print these—don’t


When you first gain access to a 3D printer, you might be tempted to print everything and anything you can. This urge can be amplified by the number of models available online and the passion of the 3D printing community.

Here are 10 things you should avoid 3D printing where possible.

Cable clips

A super-common project that’s rarely worth it

Cable clips of the Govee Outdoor String Lights 2. Credit: Jerome Thomas / How-To Geek

Cable clips are available in almost any color and design at a better price than you can print at home. You can find clips with adhesive strips already attached or pins that are ready to tap in. You can get them in packs of 60, 100, 400, or more (and the more you buy, the cheaper they get).

If you need something a little sturdier, they’re still only a dollar or so each if you look in the right place. The time and material cost means that printing your own usually isn’t worth it, unless you have some very unique use case in mind.

With very few exceptions

Some tools can absolutely benefit from a 3D printer, like battery mounts for power tools and router jigs for getting the perfect cut. That said, 3D printed tools that are going to be under pressure, like wrenches or handles for hammers, probably aren’t worth it.

A tool is only as strong as the material it is printed with, and the tougher the filament, the more the tool is going to cost you. Since tools that need to be reliable will consume more filament, you’re probably better off heading down to the hardware store and buying something more affordable that’s made from wood, metal, or injection-molded plastic instead.

Rebar chairs

Your filament isn’t strong enough

Rebar chairs sit beneath a length of rebar so that when you pour concrete on top of them, the rebar sits in the middle of the layer. You’ll find models for these in many 3D printer marketplaces, but in order to withstand the weight of the rebar, they have to be pretty sturdy.

Considering you can buy these chairs for under a dollar each at hardware stores (with the price dropping dramatically as you buy in bulk), it’s best to avoid wasting your time or filament on them.

Storage containers

A massive waste of time and money

Vinyl records sitting in a container at CES 2024. Credit: Justin Duino / How-To Geek

3D-printed storage solutions could be some of the most useful things you ever print. Gridfinity, for example, is a modular and open-source storage system that allows you to design custom bins and baseplates to keep items organized regardless of the drawer size.

But 3D-printing simple storage containers that you can pick up for a few cents at a dollar store, or anything that’s designed to be “rugged” and thus requires a more substantial filament commitment, probably isn’t worth it. Pelican brand cases are renowned for being tough and water-resistant, with a price tag to match, but you can find many similar products at lower prices in hardware stores that will outlast any 3D-printed model.

Trinkets that only collect dust

This one might be a little controversial, and I’ll be the first to say that you should print things you like, that make you happy, and that you want to look at. But it’s no secret that 3D printing has a plastic junk problem. For me, nothing is more egregious than those multi-colored articulated dragons that appear everywhere from shopping malls to market stalls.

The problem with many 3D printed items is that they can look cheap, especially unfinished, straight out of the printer. It’s one thing to design, prime, and paint miniatures for a specific purpose, but it’s another to dedicate reels of filament to items that do little but collect dust that you’ll quickly grow tired of looking at.

A few considered items from your favorite movies and games? Great. A fidget toy that sits on your desk to curb your doomscrolling? Fantastic. An articulated octopus that shatters into a hundred pieces the first time you drop it? Pass.

Fasteners

Don’t trust plastic to do metal’s job

The stripped out screw. Credit: Nick Lewis / How-To Geek

Screws, bolts, nuts, washers, and any type of threaded fastener probably aren’t worth the time or effort of 3D printing. Not only are these cheap, but they’re usually made of metal that is far more durable than any 3D printer filament. The threads are also well-defined, something that can be hard to achieve with a 3D printer.

Instead, 3D print yourself some sort of Gridfinity organizer to sort and store any fasteners you buy or salvage from other items for use in your projects.

Anything that touches food

Just buy food-safe utensils and call it a day

There are so many reasons to avoid 3D printing objects that are to be used around food, but model repositories are littered with items regardless. Some will point to the fact that PLA and PETG filaments are generally regarded as food safe, but there’s more to it than that.

Filament itself can come with all manner of impurities, which is one of the reasons it might not be a good idea to share your poorly-ventilated living space with a 3D printer. Since 3D printers work by adding filament layer by layer, it’s possible that moisture and bacteria can penetrate these layers, making them hard to clean, causing bacterial growth over time.

Even 3D printer nozzles can be a source of concern, given that many include non-stick coatings that help prevent blockages. Over time, this coating can wear away and be deposited within the prints. Some recommend the use of a food-grade sealer on any item that will be around food, which further adds to the cost and effort involved.

For safety’s sake, you’re better off just buying something that’s already food-safe instead.

Large items you can buy for a few dollars

Your filament costs money, so stop pretending your prints are free

There are some good arguments for printing small, bespoke items that would be hard to find in a shop. The material cost is often worth it in order to get something that does the job perfectly. You could pay for postage and wait a few days for an item to arrive, or you could 3D print and put the item to use within an hour.

Larger items have a far greater material cost associated with them, and they take much longer to print. I’m talking about waste baskets, decorative plant pots, vases, and other items that can typically be found for less money in more durable forms.

Solutions where wood is a better choice

Your 3D printer can’t replace everything

person using Ryobi cutoff saw Credit: Ryobi

The great thing about 3D printing is that you can design entirely bespoke items to fix problems you might have. Sometimes, this is absolutely worth it. Other times, the allure of a wasteful model that fits just right can cloud your judgement.

For example, I recall a post where someone had extended the legs on their sofa by designing a print that fit perfectly and achieved the desired height. While impressive, the amount of filament required and potential durability issues had many commenters asking why they hadn’t just used wood instead.

The same is often true for thin solutions, like a riser that can be cut out of a thin sheet of plywood.

Benchies

The most common waste of filament

A Benchy is a small boat, thusly named as it’s designed as a method of benchmarking your 3D printer. While this type of model certainly has its place, for most users, it has little practical use and only ends up wasting time and filament. Unless you test 3D printers for a living, you probably don’t ever need to print a Benchy.

Resist the urge to make this your first 3D print and pick something with utility instead.


Hungry for more 3D printing hot takes? Here are five uncomfortable truths that you need to hear.

Bambu Lab P2S 3D printer.

Build Volume

256x256x256mm

Printing Speed

600mm/s




Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


TL;DR

India debates sovereign AI after the US forced Anthropic to kill Fable 5, with proposals for a $5B fund and calls to embrace open-source models.

When the US government ordered Anthropic to shut down Fable 5 and Mythos 5 on 12 June, the export control directive was aimed at restricting foreign nationals from accessing America’s most capable AI. In India, Anthropic’s second-largest market, it landed as a warning shot about what happens when your AI infrastructure runs on someone else’s politics.

The suspension cut off Indian developers and enterprises from Claude’s most advanced models overnight. India’s Claude run-rate revenue had doubled since October 2025, and Tata Consultancy Services had announced a partnership just one day earlier, on 11 June, to train 50,000 employees on Claude and build a dedicated Anthropic business unit. That deal is now in limbo.

The timing has turned what was already a simmering debate about AI sovereignty into a full strategic reckoning. Proposals that sounded ambitious a week ago now sound urgent.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Mohandas Pai, former Infosys CFO and one of India’s most prominent tech investors, has called for a ₹50,000 crore (roughly $5 billion) annual sovereign AI fund. He has also proposed a ₹2 lakh crore (approximately $21 billion) credit guarantee to finance cloud infrastructure, hardware procurement, and semiconductor development. The figures dwarf the government’s existing commitment.

India approved its IndiaAI Mission in March 2024 with a budget of ₹10,372 crore, approximately $1.25 billion. The programme has deployed around 38,000 GPUs so far. Pai’s proposal would quadruple annual spending and add a credit backstop an order of magnitude larger.

Sridhar Vembu, the founder of Zoho, has gone further. He argued that India should embrace smaller and open-source models, including Chinese ones, rather than depend on American frontier systems that can be switched off by executive order. “Technology is the ultimate weapon,” Vembu said. “Globalization is dead and Bharat must find her own way ahead.

The argument has teeth because the suspension demonstrated exactly the vulnerability Vembu is describing. Amazon’s CEO reportedly triggered the government crackdown by telling Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that researchers had used Fable 5 to obtain information that could be used in cyberattacks. Anthropic called the action disproportionate, but compliance was immediate and global.

Policy expert Prasanto Roy put it bluntly: “American AI models are bound to American geopolitics.” For Indian enterprises that had built workflows around Claude, the lesson was that access to frontier AI is a privilege that can be revoked without notice, without consultation, and without regard for the commercial relationships it disrupts.

The Indian startup ecosystem is already adapting. Sarvam, a Bengaluru-based AI company, released 30-billion and 105-billion parameter open-source models at the India AI Impact Summit in 2026. Krutrim, founded by Ola’s Bhavish Aggarwal, has pivoted from building foundational models to providing cloud and AI infrastructure services, reporting ₹3 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2026.

Neither company is close to matching the capabilities of Fable 5 or Mythos 5. But the argument for sovereign AI was never about matching frontier performance immediately. It is about ensuring that the floor does not fall out when Washington makes a unilateral decision about who gets to use which models.

Aakrit Vaish, founder of the AI startup Activate, said the suspension “completely changes things” for the sovereign AI debate. Vijay Rayapati, CEO of Atomicwork, raised concerns about what the precedent means for Indian companies with multi-country teams that depend on American AI providers. If the US can shut off model access to enforce export controls, any country that relies on American AI is one policy decision away from disruption.

Not everyone agrees that India needs to build its own frontier models. Hemant Mohapatra, a partner at Lightspeed Venture Partners, argued that talent and compute access matter more than capital for building competitive AI. India has the engineering workforce, but the compute gap is significant, and closing it requires either massive domestic investment or continued access to foreign cloud infrastructure.

Anthropic opened a Bengaluru office as part of its India expansion, and the TCS partnership was designed to be a cornerstone of its enterprise strategy in the country. Whether those plans survive the suspension intact depends on how quickly Anthropic can restore access and whether Indian enterprises still trust a provider whose most capable models can vanish overnight.

The broader pattern is unmistakable. The US has spent four years tightening controls on AI technology, from chip export restrictions to model-level interventions. Each escalation pushes more countries toward the conclusion that dependence on American AI infrastructure carries political risk. India, with its 1.4 billion people and rapidly growing technology sector, is now asking whether it can afford that risk, and what it would cost to eliminate it.

The Opendoor layoffs in June 2026, which shut the company’s India office and affected roughly 250 employees, added another dimension. CEO Kaz Nejatian cited AI-native teams as the reason, suggesting that some US companies are using AI to reduce their reliance on Indian engineering talent at the same time that India is debating its reliance on American AI. The relationship is becoming less complementary and more competitive.

For now, the sovereign AI proposals remain proposals. Pai’s fund has no legislative vehicle, Vembu’s call for open-source adoption has no coordinated policy framework, and the IndiaAI Mission’s GPU deployment is still in early stages.

But the Anthropic suspension has done something that years of policy papers and conference speeches could not: it has given the sovereign AI movement a concrete, recent, and viscerally felt example of why dependence on foreign AI is a strategic liability. The debate is no longer theoretical.



Source link