At this point in time, if your PC still has certain ports, it’s officially too old. But that doesn’t mean that those ports (and your PC by extension) weren’t genius in their own right, or that they weren’t (in some ways) better than USB.
Whether they’re fully legacy, outdated, and forgotten, or only legacy-adjacent, some ports really could do it all. Here are some of those old-school ports that I honestly wish were still commonplace, because they addressed problems that USB cannot.
These ports weren’t 100% better, but they had their perks
They had USB beat in one key way each
I’m not here to claim that the ports I’ll talk about below are universally better. They’re not.
USB is flexible, compact, hot-swappable, and it’s literally everywhere, which matters more than any single advantage an older port might have had. But when you think about these ports, it’s hard not to think “what if,” and wish we could have some magical version of USB that actually had all these perks and more.
Some of these old ports were extremely good at the one job they were built to do. PS/2 had its keyboard perks, VGA could rescue you if you were dealing with ancient display equipment, and so on. Here’s why those outdated ports were actually pretty awesome.
Quiz
USB standards & connectors
Trivia Challenge
From clunky Type-A plugs to lightning-fast USB4 — test your knowledge of the universal serial bus revolution.
HistoryConnectorsSpeedsStandardsHardware
In what year was the original USB 1.0 specification officially released?
Correct! USB 1.0 was released in January 1996 by a consortium led by Intel, Compaq, Microsoft, and others. It aimed to replace the chaotic mix of serial ports, parallel ports, and PS/2 connectors that plagued early PCs.
Not quite — USB 1.0 launched in January 1996. It was developed by a consortium including Intel and Microsoft to simplify the frustrating tangle of legacy ports on personal computers at the time.
What is the maximum data transfer rate of USB 2.0, also known as ‘Hi-Speed’ USB?
Correct! USB 2.0 tops out at 480 Mbps, which is why it earned the ‘Hi-Speed’ label when it launched in 2000. That was a massive leap over USB 1.1’s 12 Mbps Full Speed ceiling, making it practical for external hard drives and cameras.
Not quite — the correct answer is 480 Mbps. USB 2.0 is branded ‘Hi-Speed’ and launched in 2000, offering a 40x improvement over USB 1.1’s Full Speed 12 Mbps mode, which made external storage far more viable.
Which USB connector type was specifically designed for use with mobile phones and cameras, featuring a distinctive 5-pin trapezoidal shape?
Correct! USB Mini-B was the go-to connector for early digital cameras and mobile phones before being largely replaced. It features a recognizable five-pin trapezoidal design and was formally specified in USB 2.0, though it has since been superseded by Micro-B and USB-C.
The correct answer is USB Mini-B. It was the standard connector for early digital cameras and many mobile phones, featuring a 5-pin trapezoidal shape. It was eventually displaced by the slimmer Micro-B connector, which allowed for thinner device designs.
USB 3.0 was later rebranded by the USB Implementers Forum. What is its current official name?
Correct! The USB-IF rebranded USB 3.0 as USB 3.2 Gen 1 to fit into a unified naming scheme. It still delivers the same 5 Gbps ‘SuperSpeed’ transfer rate — the confusing renaming was meant to streamline the standard’s versioning but arguably made it more complicated.
Not quite — USB 3.0 is now officially called USB 3.2 Gen 1. The USB Implementers Forum rebranded the entire USB 3.x family to create a unified naming structure, though the 5 Gbps SuperSpeed performance of the original USB 3.0 remains unchanged.
What key physical feature makes USB Type-C different from all previous USB connector types?
Correct! USB Type-C’s most celebrated feature is its symmetrical, reversible design — you can plug it in either way without fumbling. Introduced in 2014, it also supports far higher power delivery and data speeds than older connectors, making it a true universal solution.
The standout feature is its fully reversible design — you can insert a USB-C plug either way up, ending the frustration of guessing the correct orientation. Introduced in 2014, USB-C also supports higher power delivery and data speeds than its predecessors.
Which organization is responsible for developing and publishing the USB specification?
Correct! The USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) is the non-profit organization formed by the original USB developers to maintain and promote the USB specification. Founded in 1995, it certifies compliant products and grants the right to use the official USB logo.
The correct answer is the USB-IF, or USB Implementers Forum. This non-profit was founded in 1995 by the companies that originally developed USB, including Intel and Microsoft. It maintains the specification, runs compliance programs, and certifies products to carry the USB logo.
What maximum power output did USB Power Delivery 3.1 introduce, enabling charging of high-performance laptops?
Correct! USB Power Delivery 3.1, released in 2021, dramatically raised the ceiling to 240 watts using Extended Power Range (EPR) mode. This is enough to charge even power-hungry gaming laptops and workstations over a single USB-C cable, replacing bulky proprietary chargers.
The answer is 240 watts. USB Power Delivery 3.1, introduced in 2021, added an Extended Power Range (EPR) mode that maxes out at 240W over a USB-C cable. Earlier PD versions were capped at 100W, which was insufficient for many high-performance laptops.
USB4, released in 2019, is based on which company’s proprietary technology that was donated to the USB-IF?
Correct! Intel donated the Thunderbolt 3 specification to the USB-IF, which became the foundation for USB4. This means USB4 at its fastest tier (40 Gbps) is technically compatible with Thunderbolt 3 devices, blurring the line between the two standards significantly.
The correct answer is Intel’s Thunderbolt 3. Intel donated its Thunderbolt 3 spec to the USB Implementers Forum, and it became the basis for USB4. The top USB4 speed tier of 40 Gbps mirrors Thunderbolt 3, and the two standards share a high degree of compatibility.
Your Score
/ 8
Thanks for playing!
5 legacy ports that still beat USB
How many of these are you familiar with?
I’ve used every single port listed below. They’re all but extinct, with one or two notable exceptions, but personally, I haven’t used any of these in a long time.
1. PS/2
The PS/2 port was a round, usually purple or green connector you’d find on older PCs, and it was used for keyboards and mice. PS/2 showed up on countless motherboards, office PCs, and prebuilt desktops, but you’ll mostly only see it today on older systems or a handful of enthusiast motherboards that still keep it around for compatibility.
What made PS/2 interesting is that it was a dedicated input port, not just one device competing for attention on a shared USB controller. Its big technical claim to fame is that it used interrupts instead of USB-style polling, which is why you’ll sometimes hear that it has lower latency or better keyboard rollover.
2. RS-232 serial
The RS-232 serial ports, often just called COM ports, were once found on desktop PCs, laptops, modems, networking gear, and all sorts of hardware. They used those chunky D-sub connectors, usually with nine pins on PCs, and they were good at letting one device talk to another.
Believe it or not, the COM port had USB beat with its simplicity. USB is faster and more convenient, but it depends on device detection, drivers, operating system support, and a whole lot more negotiation before anything useful happens. RS-232 is much dumber, and I mean that in the nicest way possible. Once the basic settings match, it can send plain commands back and forth with little to no overhead. That made it useful for modems, networking consoles, industrial machines, and so on. As a result, USB-to-serial adapters exist today.
3. The 3.5mm audio jack
I have a feeling that this is the entry that’s going to get the most pushback, but I stand by it: the 3.5mm audio jack is on its way out, whether we like it or not. It may not truly be dead on desktop PCs, where motherboard audio ports are still common, but most phones, tablets, and thin laptops have already waved goodbye to the humble 3.5mm audio jack.
For decades, this little round port was the default way to connect audio equipment. It still beats USB in the same way some other ports on this list do: with simplicity. No pairing, no charging, no dongle, no drivers. It just works as long as you plug it into the correct jack. USB audio can be excellent, and Bluetooth is convenient, but the 3.5mm audio jack is still hard to beat.
4. Optical S/PDIF
Optical S/PDIF, often called TOSLINK, was the little square-ish audio port with a flap or red light hiding inside it. Unlike the 3.5mm jack, it didn’t carry analog audio, but it carried digital audio over light through a fiber-optic cable, which already made it feel far fancier and more futuristic than it actually was.
Its biggest win over ISB lies in isolation. Because optical audio uses light instead of an electrical connection, it can avoid some of the grounding and electrical noise problems that can creep into PC audio setups.
5. FireWire
FireWire, also known as IEEE 1394, was a high-speed port that showed up on some desktops, Macs, camcorders, external drives, and pro audio gear. It was especially common for MiniDV and HDV camcorders, where it could transfer digital video from tape to a computer.
FireWire’s advantage was that it was built for steady, reliable data transfer, especially for audio and video work. It also had peer-to-peer capabilities, meaning devices could communicate without leaning on the host system in the same way USB did (and still does).
Old ports are only useless until you need one
USB is universal, but it’s not perfect
Most of the ports on the list above are all but useless now, but in the rare event that you own a device that connects through them, you’ll probably wish you could have a PC that can still support them. While it’d certainly be nice to have a computer that can support a million different ports, the reality of it would be so impractical that it makes sense to let go and embrace USB fully, with all of its perks and its downsides.
Flexibility definitely wins these days
Each of these ports managed to beat USB in some way, all the while no longer being the current standard. The reason is simple: flexibility always wins. USB may be confusing, but most devices support it these days, and that convenience is more important than an (often insignificant) performance improvement.
