The discontinued Kia that’s a pre-owned bargain


The Kia Forte quietly disappeared after the 2024 model year, replaced by the new K4 as Kia continued reshaping its sedan lineup. Unlike many discontinued cars, the Forte wasn’t pushed aside because it was outdated—it simply became another compact sedan overlooked as buyers moved toward SUVs.

That’s exactly what makes it interesting today. With used prices sitting below rivals like the Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla, the final-generation Forte has become one of those forgotten bargains that offers far more than its reputation suggests.

The Forte combines low running costs, modern features, and solid reliability into a package that makes a lot of sense for budget-conscious buyers. It may not have the badge recognition of its Japanese rivals, but its value becomes much harder to ignore once depreciation enters the picture.

In order to give you the most up-to-date and accurate information possible, the data used to compile this article was sourced from Kia and other authoritative sources, including CarEdge, J.D. Power, RepairPal, and TopSpeed.

Why Kia moved on from the Forte

The end wasn’t about the car

Static front 3/4 shot of a 2022 Kia Forte. Credit: NetCarShow.com

The compact sedan market has been shrinking for years, and the Forte eventually became another casualty of that shift. As buyers continued moving toward crossovers and SUVs, even affordable sedans with strong value propositions became harder to justify.

Kia ended Forte production after the 2024 model year, but the decision wasn’t because the sedan had lost its appeal. The Forte was replaced by the K4, which follows Kia’s newer naming strategy and gives the brand a more modern entry in the compact sedan segment.

The change also reflects how much Kia has evolved. The company that was once known mainly for offering affordable transportation now competes on styling, technology, and features, with vehicles that can stand alongside more established Japanese rivals.

That leaves the Forte in an interesting position. It’s a discontinued sedan with modern equipment, proven mechanicals, and the kind of depreciation that creates opportunities for used-car shoppers.

The used market tells the story

Why the Forte is a bargain

Dynamic rear 3/4 shot of a 2022 Kia Forte. Credit: NetCarShow.com

The Forte has never held onto its value like the Civic, Corolla, or Mazda3. That’s not necessarily because it’s a worse car, but because Kia still doesn’t carry the same resale reputation as its Japanese rivals.

According to CarEdge, the Forte is expected to lose around 39 percent of its value after five years, leaving it with an estimated resale value of $15,023. That puts it behind some competitors, but it also means used buyers can get a newer compact sedan without paying the premium attached to better-known nameplates.

The final 2024 model year is where things get especially interesting. CarEdge ranks the 2024 Forte as the best-value model year, with an estimated current price of $18,136, meaning buyers are paying around 74 percent of its original price while still getting around 92 percent of its useful life remaining.

That depreciation is exactly what creates the opportunity. The Forte may not win the resale battle against the Civic or Corolla, but used buyers are the ones who benefit from that difference.

Why it’s a worthy bargain

Reliability pays off

Dynamic front 3/4 shot of a 2022 Kia Forte. Credit: NetCarShow.com

A lower resale value doesn’t always mean a car is a bad buy. In the Forte’s case, depreciation has more to do with Kia’s reputation gap than any major weakness in the final generation of the compact sedan.

According to RepairPal, the Forte earns a 4.5 out of 5.0 reliability rating, ranking sixth out of 36 compact cars. Its average annual repair cost of $451 also undercuts the compact car average of $526, helping make it one of the more affordable cars in its class to own.

The Forte also benefits from sharing much of its engineering with the Hyundai Elantra. That means proven components, strong parts availability, and lower repair complexity compared with some rivals that rely on more expensive systems.

Shot of the engine under the hood of a 2022 Kia Forte. Credit: NetCarShow.com

For most buyers, the 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine paired with Kia’s Intelligent Variable Transmission is the sensible choice. It won’t deliver sports car thrills, but its simple setup is exactly what makes the Forte such an appealing long-term ownership proposition.

For enthusiasts, the Forte GT adds a different personality. With a turbocharged engine, sharper suspension tuning, and an available manual transmission, it turns Kia’s affordable sedan into something far more interesting than its price tag suggests.

What a Forte offers

More than just value

Close-up shot of the headlight on a 2022 Kia Forte. Credit: NetCarShow.com

The Forte’s biggest problem was never that it was a bad car—it was that it was easy to overlook. In a segment dominated by the Civic, Corolla, and Mazda3, the Forte often got lost despite offering many of the same everyday strengths.

The final-generation model brought a cleaner design, better technology, and a more premium feel than many buyers expected from an affordable compact sedan. After the 2022 facelift, the Forte gained sharper LED lighting, a sportier front end, and Kia’s updated design language that helped it look far more expensive than it was.

Inside, the Forte continued that theme with a simple, modern cabin layout. Higher trims could be equipped with dual 10.25-inch displays, a Harman Kardon sound system, wireless connectivity features, and the kind of equipment that helped separate it from basic economy cars.

The materials won’t quite match something like the Mazda3, but the Forte delivers a comfortable and well-organized interior for daily use. It’s a car that focuses on giving buyers more features for their money rather than chasing luxury pretensions.

Solid or spirited mechanicals

The GT adds some fun

Dynamic front-end shot of a 2022 Kia Forte. Credit: NetCarShow.com

The Forte was never designed to be a performance sedan first, but its mechanical lineup gave buyers two very different personalities to choose from. The standard setup focused on efficiency and low running costs, while the GT added the kind of driving character that most compact sedans have moved away from.

Most 2024 Forte models came equipped with a 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine producing 147 horsepower and 132 lb-ft of torque. Paired with Kia’s IVT transmission, this combination was built for easy commuting, strong fuel economy, and affordable ownership rather than outright excitement.

The Forte GT took a completely different approach. Its turbocharged 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine produced 201 horsepower and 195 lb-ft of torque, with buyers able to choose between a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic or a six-speed manual transmission.

Dynamic rear 3/4 shot of a 2022 Kia Forte. Credit: NetCarShow.com

Unlike many front-wheel-drive performance cars that struggle with excessive understeer, the Forte GT feels surprisingly balanced when pushed. The turbo engine delivers its power smoothly, the chassis feels eager to rotate, and the available sport-tuned suspension gives it a level of engagement that makes it a genuine alternative to cars like the Civic Si.

It isn’t a high-performance machine, but that was never the point. The Forte GT succeeds because it delivers a lightweight, affordable, and entertaining driving experience without the price tag attached to more established enthusiast sedans.

What to watch for before you buy

Choosing the right Forte

The Forte’s reputation has improved significantly over the years, but buying any used car still requires some homework. The final-generation models are the ones to focus on, as they benefit from Kia’s latest improvements and avoid many of the issues that affected older vehicles from the brand.

The biggest advantage of shopping for a 2022–2024 Forte is that these cars represent the most refined version of the formula. The facelift brought updated styling and technology, while the core mechanical components had already been proven over several years.

The standard 2.0-liter engine is the safer pick for buyers prioritizing simplicity and long-term ownership. It pairs well with Kia’s IVT transmission and offers the kind of low-stress reliability that makes sense for a commuter or first-time used-car buyer.

Close-up shot of the gear shift paddle behind the steering wheel of a 2022 Kia Forte. Credit: NetCarShow.com

The Forte GT is the more appealing choice for enthusiasts, but it comes with a few extra considerations. The turbocharged engine and dual-clutch transmission add more performance and character, although buyers should pay closer attention to service history, especially on higher-mileage examples.

As always, checking the vehicle history, confirming maintenance records, and getting a pre-purchase inspection are worthwhile steps. The Forte is already one of the more affordable ways into a modern compact sedan, and finding a well-maintained example only strengthens its value proposition.

Why it’s only getting more appealing

A bargain after goodbye

Close-up shot of the badge on the hood of a 2022 Kia Forte. Credit: NetCarShow.com

The Forte may not have disappeared because it was a bad car, but because Kia was moving its lineup in a different direction. The arrival of the K4 effectively replaced the Forte, giving Kia a more modern compact sedan that fits its current naming strategy.

That’s what makes the final Forte models more interesting today. Buyers are getting the last version of a proven formula, with modern technology, solid reliability, and a price point that has already taken the biggest depreciation hit.

It’s easy to overlook a discontinued compact sedan when newer models are grabbing attention. But for buyers who care more about value than chasing the latest badge, the Forte makes a strong case with its low ownership costs and generous equipment list.

The Forte was never the class leader in resale value or brand prestige, but that’s exactly why it works as a used bargain. With production over and prices staying accessible, this overlooked Kia is one of the few compact sedans left that delivers a lot of car without asking for much in return.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


TL;DR

Meta stripped NameTag facial recognition code from its AI app one day after WIRED exposed it on 50 million phones. Meta says no decision has been made.

Meta removed nearly all traces of an unreleased facial recognition system from its smart glasses companion app on Friday, one day after WIRED reported that the software had been quietly embedded in an app installed on more than 50 million phones. The feature, which Meta internally called NameTag, was designed to convert faces captured by the company’s Ray-Ban smart glasses into unique biometric signatures and compare them against a database stored on the user’s device. WIRED also found that faces the system failed to recognise were cropped, indexed, and stored locally for future processing.

Andy Stone, Meta’s vice president of communications, told WIRED on Monday that the feature is “purely exploratory,” adding that no final decision has been made on what to do with it. That characterisation sits uneasily with the evidence WIRED documented. The version of Meta AI published the day of WIRED’s Thursday report contained several code libraries explicitly named for face recognition, a process for running the NameTag recognition pipeline, and a “Person recognised” alert the app would have shown if someone were identified.

Friday’s release stripped all of it out, along with a folder where the app would have stored the cropped images and biometric signatures of unrecognised faces. Meta did not answer WIRED’s questions about why the code was removed or whether the changes were planned before the story was published. A few fragments remain in the latest version, including an internal debug menu label and a dormant link meant to open a recognised person’s profile, pointing to parts of the system that are no longer there.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The gap between Meta’s public statements and the code WIRED found is the central tension. Before the Thursday report, Stone dismissed the findings by writing that the company could not answer questions about how the system would work because “the feature does not exist.” Andrew Bosworth, Meta’s chief technology officer, called the reporting “incredibly misleading” and “absolutely dishonest.” Yet the code was functional enough to include three AI models, one to detect faces, another to crop them, and a third to encode them as biometric data, all embedded in the companion app for a product already at the centre of a mounting privacy crisis.

Meta declined to answer ten questions WIRED posed before publishing, including whether it had already created the database of face profiles NameTag uses, how long the app retains photographs and biometric data of unrecognised people, and whether that data would ever be sent back to Meta’s servers. The company also did not respond to questions about whether it was building NameTag for blind or low-vision users, or to criticism from privacy advocates who warned the system could let stalkers and abusers identify strangers in public.

NameTag first surfaced in February, when The New York Times, citing internal Meta documents, reported that the company was developing face recognition for its smart glasses and considering a launch as early as this year. One internal memo reportedly described releasing the feature during a “dynamic political environment” when privacy and civil liberties advocates would be distracted by other concerns. WIRED subsequently found that much of NameTag’s machinery had been built into the Meta AI app as early as January, months before any public acknowledgement, adding another layer to the company’s pattern of shipping first and disclosing later when it comes to its smart glasses.

Kade Crockford, director of the technology for liberty programme at the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, said the removal does not undo the original decision to ship the code and pointed to it as evidence that consumer privacy needs stronger legal protection than Congress has been willing to provide. The Massachusetts House of Representatives last week unanimously passed a consumer privacy bill that, if enacted as written, would impose strong enforcement provisions including a private right of action allowing aggrieved users to sue. “State lawmakers need to do their job and step up to protect consumer privacy,” Crockford said.

Meta’s sneaky tactics in slipping the face-recognition code into its smart glasses show exactly why data privacy bills need the teeth of strong enforcement,” Crockford added. “Companies like Meta prioritise their bottom line, so lawmakers need to speak in the only language its C-suite understands.” Whether a code removal prompted by investigative reporting constitutes a victory or merely a tactical retreat depends on what Meta does next, and on whether the regulatory pressure building on both sides of the Atlantic produces enforceable consequences before the feature quietly returns under a different name.



Source link