Brand is right, too, that maintainers haven’t gotten the laurels they deserve. Over the past few decades, scholars have shown that work from oiling tools to replacing worn parts to updating code bases all tends to be lower in status than “innovation.” Maintenance gets neglected in many organizational and social settings. (Just look at some American infrastructure!) And as the right-to-­repair movement has shown, companies in pursuit of greater profits have frequently locked us out of being able to do repairs or greatly reduced the maintainable life of their products. It’s hard to think of any other reason to put a computer in the door of a refrigerator.

Some of Brand’s earlier work helped inspire those insights. But his new book makes me think he doesn’t see things that way. For Brand, maintenance seems to be a solitary act, profound but more about personal success and fulfillment than tending to a shared world or making it better.


Born in 1938, Brand is 87 years old. A sense hangs over the book—with its battles against corrosion, rust, and decay, with its attempts to keep things going even as they inevitably falter—of someone looking over life and pondering its end. Maintenance: Of Everything connects to every stage of Brand’s life. It’s worth reviewing where it falls in that arc. Brand has always been interested in tools and fixing things, but rarely has he focused on the systems that need the most care. 

More than a half-century ago, Brand was a member of the Merry Pranksters, a countercultural, LSD-centered hippie collective famously led by Ken Kesey, the author of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. In 1966, Brand co-produced the Trips Festival, where bands like the Grateful Dead and Big Brother and the Holding Company performed for thousands amid psychedelic light shows.

Brand’s Whole Earth Catalog had a vision that might feel progressive, but its libertarian, rugged-individualist philosophy of remaking civilization alone stood in contrast to more collective social change movements.

In some ways, the Trips Festival set a paradigm for the rest of his life’s work. Brand’s biographers have described him as a network celebrity—someone who got ahead by bringing people together, building coalitions of influential figures who could boost his signal. As Kesey put it in 1980, “Stewart recognizes power. And cleaves to it.” 

Brand applied this network logic to the undertaking he will always be best remembered for: the Whole Earth Catalog. First published in 1968 and aimed at hippies and members of the nascent back-to-the-land movement, the publication had the motto “Access to tools.” Its pages were full of Quonset huts, geodesic domes, solar panels, well pumps, water filters, and other technologies for life off the grid. It was a vision that might feel progressive or left-leaning, but the libertarian, rugged-individualist philosophy of eschewing corrupt systems and remaking civilization alone stood in contrast to the more collective movements pushing for deep social change at the time—like civil rights, feminism, and environmentalism.

That vision also led straight to the empowerment that came with new digital tools, and to Silicon Valley. In 1985, Brand published the Whole Earth Software Catalog, the last of the series, and also cofounded the WELL—the Whole Earth ’Lectronic Link, a pioneering online community famous for, among other things, facilitating the trade of Grateful Dead bootlegs. He also wrote a hagiographic book about the MIT Media Lab, known for its corporate-sponsored research into new communications tech. “The Lab would cure the pathologies of technology not with economics or politics but with technology,” Brand wrote. Again, not collective action, not policymaking: tools. And Brand then cofounded the Global Business Network, a group of pricey consulting futurists that further connected him to MIT, Stanford, and the Valley. Brand had literally helped bring about the modern digital revolution.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews



Researchers at the University of Washington have developed a new prototype system that could change how people interact with artificial intelligence in daily life. Called VueBuds, the system integrates tiny cameras into standard wireless earbuds, allowing users to ask an AI model questions about the world around them in near real time.

The concept is simple but powerful. A user can look at an object, such as a food package in a foreign language, and ask the AI to translate it. Within about a second, the system responds with an answer through the earbuds, creating a seamless, hands-free interaction.

A Different Approach To AI Wearables

Unlike smart glasses, which have struggled with adoption due to privacy concerns and design limitations, VueBuds takes a more subtle approach. The system uses low-resolution, black-and-white cameras embedded in earbuds to capture still images rather than continuous video.

These images are transmitted via Bluetooth to a connected device, where a small AI model processes them locally. This on-device processing ensures that data does not need to be sent to the cloud, addressing one of the biggest concerns around wearable cameras.

To further enhance privacy, the earbuds include a visible indicator light when recording and allow users to delete captured images instantly.

Engineering Around Power And Performance Limits

One of the biggest challenges the research team faced was power consumption. Cameras require significantly more energy than microphones, making it impractical to use high-resolution sensors like those found in smart glasses.

To solve this, the team used a camera roughly the size of a grain of rice, capturing low-resolution grayscale images. This approach reduces battery usage and allows efficient Bluetooth transmission without compromising responsiveness.

Placement was another key consideration. By angling the cameras slightly outward, the system achieves a field of view between 98 and 108 degrees. While there is a small blind spot for objects held extremely close, researchers found this does not affect typical usage.

The system also combines images from both earbuds into a single frame, improving processing speed. This allows VueBuds to respond in about one second, compared to two seconds when handling images separately.

Performance Compared To Smart Glasses

In testing, 74 participants compared VueBuds with smart glasses such as Meta’s Ray-Ban models. Despite using lower-resolution images and local processing, VueBuds performed similarly overall.

The report showed participants preferred VueBuds for translation tasks, while smart glasses performed better at counting objects. In separate trials, VueBuds achieved accuracy rates of around 83–84% for translation and object identification, and up to 93% for identifying book titles and authors.

Why This Matters And What Comes Next

The research highlights a potential shift in how AI-powered wearables are designed. By embedding visual intelligence into a device people already use, the system avoids many of the barriers faced by smart glasses.

However, limitations remain. The current system cannot interpret color, and its capabilities are still in early stages. The team plans to explore adding color sensors and developing specialised AI models for tasks like translation and accessibility support.

The researchers will present their findings at the Association for Computing Machinery Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems in Barcelona, offering a glimpse into a future where everyday devices quietly become intelligent assistants.



Source link