The best Zoom alternatives in 2026: Expert tested and reviewed


Video calls are exhausting. You’re juggling screen sharing, managing participants, and dealing with spotty connections. The last thing you need is headache-inducing software.

Zoom became very popular during the pandemic, but it’s not your only option for video conferencing. Google Meet integrates seamlessly with your calendar. Microsoft Teams works better for enterprises. Platforms like Whereby require zero downloads. I’ve tested these platforms many times over my career, reviewing B2B software, watching them evolve with each major update. Some got better, others stayed stagnant, and a few surprised me with features that genuinely improved my workday.

Get more in-depth ZDNET tech coverage: Add us as a preferred Google source on Chrome and Chromium browsers.

What is the best Zoom alternative right now?

Google Meet takes the top spot for most teams. The platform supports up to 100 participants free and works directly in your browser. I particularly appreciate how it automatically pulls meeting details from Gmail and Calendar. No more copying links between apps.

Also: The best business messaging apps

The best Zoom alternatives of 2026

Show less

Google rolls out new features for Meet, including a 30 minute caption history and Gemini-powered 'Next Steps'

ZDNET

Google Meet has become my default recommendation for most teams, especially those already using Google Workspace. The free tier generously supports up to 100 participants, and everything runs smoothly in your browser without downloads. I found the automatic integration with Gmail and Calendar fully eliminates the constant back-and-forth of scheduling, which is a relief.

The video and audio quality consistently impressed me during testing. Google’s noise-cancelation filters out background sounds without making voices sound robotic. This matters when you’re on calls from coffee shops or busy homes. The platform now includes AI-powered features through Gemini integration on paid plans, offering meeting summaries and smart recaps that actually save time during follow-ups.

Also: This Google Meet tool could help you look better in meetings – even the early ones

Paid plans start at $6 per user monthly through Google Workspace Business Starter. This tier removes the 60-minute time limit and adds intelligent noise-cancelation plus dial-in numbers. The Business Standard plan at $12 monthly includes meeting recording saved directly to Google Drive, breakout rooms, and polling features that make interactive sessions much easier to manage.

The interface stays deliberately simple. Beginners appreciate this, but power users might find it limiting. You won’t get the extensive customization options that platforms like Zoom offer, but most teams don’t actually need those features anyway.

Google Meet features: Up to 500 participants | Meeting recording | Breakout rooms | Live captions | Noise cancellation | Screen sharing | Virtual backgrounds


Read More

Show Expert Take Show less

Show less

Microsoft New Teams

Microsoft

Microsoft Teams dominates in enterprise environments for good reason. The platform handles everything from quick video calls to massive company-wide broadcasts, with participant limits reaching 10,000 attendees on enterprise plans. I tested Teams multiple times over the last few years. The integration with Outlook, Word, Excel, and SharePoint creates a truly unified workspace with no context switching.

Security features justify the higher price tag for regulated industries. Teams includes end-to-end encryption, advanced compliance tools through Microsoft Purview, and granular administrative controls that IT departments actually need. The platform’s Together Mode creates an interesting shared virtual space that makes larger meetings feel more engaging than traditional grid layouts.

Also: Microsoft Copilot is taking over Teams. Here’s how AI will shape your daily workflow

Pricing starts at $4 per user monthly for Teams Essentials, which includes unlimited meetings up to 30 hours and 300 participants. Most businesses opt for Microsoft 365 Business Standard at $12.50 monthly, bundling Teams with desktop Office apps and 1TB cloud storage. The Business Premium plan costs $22 monthly and adds advanced security features including Microsoft Defender and endpoint management.

The main drawback that hits new users is that Teams packs so many features that the interface feels cluttered. You’ll need time to learn where everything lives. This makes it less ideal for occasional users or external collaborators who just need simple video calls.


Read More

Show Expert Take Show less

Show less

Zoho Meeting

Zoho

Zoho Meeting delivers remarkable value for budget-conscious businesses. The platform starts at just $1 per host monthly when billed annually, supporting 10 participants with essential features including screen sharing and recording. This pricing undercuts nearly every competitor while maintaining solid core functionality that actually works.

The interface strikes a nice balance between simplicity and capability. You won’t find advanced features like AI noise cancellation or fancy virtual backgrounds. But everything you need for professional meetings exists in easy-to-find locations. Teams already using other Zoho products benefit from excellent integration with Zoho CRM, Projects, and Calendar. But connections to non-Zoho tools remain sadly limited.

Video and audio quality generally performs well, though I’ve noticed occasional blurriness during bandwidth-constrained calls with larger groups. The platform includes separate editions for meetings and webinars, with webinar pricing starting at $7.50 monthly for 25 attendees. Recording capabilities and cloud storage come standard on paid plans, with recordings saved in the Zoho ecosystem for easy access.

Again, the biggest limitation affects companies that rely heavily on third-party integrations. While Zoho Meeting connects smoothly with other Zoho products, you’ll struggle to build complex workflows with external tools that platforms like Google Meet or Teams handle effortlessly.

Zoho Meeting features: Up to 250 participants | Screen sharing | Meeting recording | Webinar mode | Polls and Q&A | Calendar integration | Mobile apps


Read More

Show Expert Take Show less

Show less

Jitsi Meet

Jitsi

Jitsi is the premier open-source video conferencing platform for privacy-conscious organizations. Anyone can use the free public instance at meet.jit.si without creating accounts or installing software: Just share a link and start talking. The platform supports unlimited participants theoretically, though performance depends entirely on your server specifications when self-hosting.

Organizations wanting complete data control can deploy Jitsi on their own infrastructure. The setup process requires technical knowledge. It runs best on Ubuntu with proper configuration of components like Jitsi Videobridge and Jibri for recording. However, this gives you something valuable that commercial platforms can’t offer. You get absolute certainty that your meeting data stays on servers you control.

The platform implements end-to-end encryption and doesn’t collect user data, making it ideal for healthcare, legal, and government organizations with strict privacy requirements. Integration options include SIP support for traditional phone systems and APIs for embedding into custom applications. The active open-source community regularly contributes improvements and maintains extensive documentation.

I can say from experience that self-hosting demands ongoing maintenance and technical expertise. You’ll need someone who can handle server management, troubleshoot connectivity issues, and keep everything updated. For teams without dedicated IT resources, the free public instance works fine for basic needs but offers no guarantees around uptime or support.

Jitsi features: Unlimited participants | Screen sharing | Recording | End-to-end encryption | No downloads needed | Custom branding | SIP integration


Read More

Show Expert Take Show less

Show less

whereby homepage

Screenshot by Ritoban Mukherjee/ZDNET

Whereby wins on pure simplicity. You get a permanent room URL that works every single time. No generating new links, no scheduling interfaces, no confusion about where to click. I like how participants join instantly through their browsers without downloads, registrations, or technical friction that typically derails client meetings.

The free plan supports one host and up to 100 participants in a single room, perfect for consultants, therapists, or small business owners running regular client calls. Paid plans start at $9 monthly for the Pro tier, adding recording capabilities and removing the Whereby branding. The Business plan at $12 per host monthly supports up to 200 participants with custom branding and priority support.

Video and audio quality remain consistently reliable even on slower connections, though Whereby lacks the advanced noise cancellation found in Google Meet or Teams. The platform includes useful features like breakout rooms, virtual backgrounds, and waiting room controls that give hosts appropriate management capabilities without complexity.

Whereby deliberately keeps things minimal. That means missing features that power users expect. You won’t find extensive analytics, advanced security controls, or deep integrations with business tools. The platform works beautifully for straightforward video calls but struggles when you need sophisticated meeting management or enterprise-grade capabilities.

Whereby features: Up to 200 participants | Screen sharing | Breakout rooms | Virtual backgrounds | Recording | Custom branding | Waiting room


Read More

Show Expert Take Show less

Platform

Starting cost

Customizable?

Integrations

Easy to use?

Google Meet

Free (up to $22 per user per month)

Limited options

Extensive – Google Workspace, Calendar, Gmail

Yes – intuitive interface

Microsoft Teams

$4 per user per month

Highly customizable

Extensive – Office 365, SharePoint, over 1,000 apps

Requires training – complex interface

Zoho Meeting

$1 per host per month

Basic customization

Limited – mainly Zoho products

Yes – straightforward setup

Jitsi

Free (self-hosted)

Fully customizable open-source

Moderate – SIP, APIs available

Requires training – setup needs technical skills

Whereby

Free (up to $12 per host per month)

Basic branding options

Limited – Miro, Trello, Google Drive

Yes – extremely simple


Show more

Choose this platform…

If you want or need…

Google Meet

Seamless integration with Gmail and Google Calendar without installation hassles. Perfect for teams already using Google Workspace who want video calls that just work.

Microsoft Teams

Enterprise-grade security and collaboration tools with deep Office 365 integration. Best for larger organizations needing advanced compliance features and unified communications.

Zoho Meeting

Maximum value for your budget without sacrificing core functionality. Ideal for small businesses and Zoho ecosystem users prioritizing cost savings over extensive integrations.

Jitsi

Complete control over your meeting data with open-source flexibility. Perfect for privacy-focused organizations with technical resources to self-host and maintain their own infrastructure.

Whereby

The absolute simplest video conferencing experience with permanent room links. Great for consultants, therapists, and service providers who want clients to join instantly without technical friction.


Show more

Selecting the right video conferencing platform requires looking beyond headline features. You need to understand how it fits your specific workflow. Here are the key factors that actually matter in daily use:

  • Integration capabilities: Your video platform needs to connect smoothly with existing tools. Google Meet excels for Gmail users. Teams dominates in Microsoft environments. Zoho Meeting works best within the Zoho ecosystem. Consider which calendar system you use, where you store files, and which CRM or project management tools your team relies on daily.

  • Participant limits and pricing structure: Free tiers vary dramatically in their restrictions. Google Meet caps free meetings at 60 minutes for groups. Whereby limits participants but allows longer sessions. Calculate your typical meeting size and frequency to avoid hitting artificial limits or paying for capacity you don’t need.

  • Setup friction for external participants: Platforms requiring downloads or account creation create barriers that derail client meetings. Whereby and Google Meet work directly in browsers. This makes them ideal when working with external stakeholders who resist installing software. Consider how tech-savvy your typical participants are and whether they’ll tolerate setup steps.

  • Security and compliance requirements: Healthcare, legal, and financial organizations need platforms meeting specific regulatory standards. Microsoft Teams offers enterprise-grade compliance tools. Jitsi provides complete data control through self-hosting. Review your industry’s requirements before committing to any platform.

  • Recording and transcript capabilities: Many platforms lock recording behind paid tiers or limit storage. Google Meet saves recordings to Drive on paid plans. Teams includes transcription. Whereby adds recording at the Pro level. Determine whether you need recordings for compliance, training, or reference purposes.

  • Mobile experience quality: Teams on the go need apps that actually work well on phones and tablets. Test the mobile versions thoroughly if you have field staff or frequently join meetings away from your desk. Some platforms prioritize desktop experiences while neglecting mobile functionality.

  • Technical support availability: Free tiers often lack responsive support when things break. Consider whether you can troubleshoot issues yourself or need guaranteed response times. Enterprise plans from Microsoft and Google include priority support that matters when critical meetings hang in the balance.


Show more

I’ve been reviewing B2B software for over eight years now. I’ve tested each video conferencing platform dozens of times as they roll out updates. So, I know which platforms have improved dramatically and which ones keep making the same mistakes. This experience helps me distinguish between genuinely useful features and marketing fluff.

I evaluated these platforms through hands-on testing that mimics real-world use rather than controlled demos. Each platform was tested across different scenarios — quick one-on-one calls, team meetings with screen sharing, and larger presentations with audience participation. I paid special attention to setup friction because that’s where most platforms lose users. I timed how long it takes from initial signup to actually starting a productive meeting.

Video and audio quality matter more than feature lists. I tested each platform under various network conditions and with different numbers of participants. 


Show more

Meeting participants can join Google Meet calls through shared links without accounts on paid plans. However, hosting meetings requires a Google account. The free tier lets anyone with a Google account create meetings supporting up to 100 participants for 60 minutes.


Show more

All platforms reviewed offer mobile apps for iOS and Android. Google Meet and Microsoft Teams provide full-featured mobile experiences with most desktop capabilities. Whereby works directly in mobile browsers without requiring app downloads, though the dedicated app offers better performance. Jitsi includes mobile apps, but the experience varies depending on whether you’re using the public instance or self-hosted deployment.


Show more

Security levels vary significantly. Microsoft Teams offers enterprise-grade security features including advanced compliance tools and endpoint management. Jitsi provides complete data control through self-hosting with end-to-end encryption. Google Meet includes solid security appropriate for most business use. Each platform has addressed the security concerns that plagued early video conferencing, but regulated industries should carefully review specific compliance requirements.


Show more

Recording capabilities remain locked behind paid tiers on most platforms. Google Meet requires Business Standard or higher for recording. Microsoft Teams includes recording on paid plans starting with Essentials. Zoho Meeting adds recording on paid tiers. Whereby offers recording with Pro plans and above. Jitsi supports recording when self-hosted with proper Jibri configuration, but the free public instance doesn’t include this feature.


Show more

Other Zoom alternatives to consider

Show less

GoTo Meeting

Screenshot via ZDNET

Business-oriented video conferencing with reliable performance and easy screen sharing, priced competitively for small to mid-sized organizations needing straightforward meeting tools.


Read More

Show Expert Take Show less

Show less

Slack

Screenshot via ZDNET

Lightweight audio-first meetings with optional video built directly into Slack channels and DMs, perfect for teams already using Slack who want spontaneous conversations without leaving their collaboration platform.


Read More

Show Expert Take Show less





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Do you ever walk past a person on the streets exhibiting mental health issues and wonder what happened to their family? I have a brother—or at least, I used to. I worry about where he is and hope he is safe. He hasn’t taken my call since 2014.

James and his brother as young children playing together before his brother became sick. James is on the right and his brother is on the left.

James and his brother as young children playing together before his brother became sick. James is on the right and his brother is on the left.

When I was 13, I had a very bad day. I was in the back of the car, and what I remember most was the world-crushing sound violently panging off every surface: he was pounding his fists into the steering wheel, and I worried it would break apart. He was screaming at me and my mother, and I remember the web of saliva and tears hanging over his mouth. His eyes were red, and I knew this day would change everything between us. My brother was sick.

Nearly 20 years later, I still have trouble thinking about him. By the time we realized he was mentally ill, he was no longer a minor. The police brought him to a facility for the standard 72-hour hold, where he was diagnosed with paranoid delusional schizophrenia. Concluding he was not a danger to himself or others, they released him.

There was only one problem: at 18, my brother told the facility he was not related to us and that we were imposters. When they let him out, he refused to come home.

My parents sought help and even arranged for medication, but he didn’t take it. Before long, he disappeared.

My brother’s decline and disappearance had nothing to do with the common narratives about drug use or criminal behavior. He was sick. By the time my family discovered his condition, he was already 18 and legally independent from our custody.

The last time he let me visit, I asked about his bed. I remember seeing his dirty mattress on the floor beside broken glass and garbage. I also asked about the laptop my parents had gifted him just a year earlier. He needed the money, he said—and he had maxed out my parents’ credit card.

In secret from my parents, I gave him all the cash I had saved. I just wanted him to be alright.

My parents and I tried texting and calling him; there was no response except the occasional text every few weeks. But weeks turned into months.

Before long, I was graduating from high school. I begged him to come. When I looked in the bleachers, he was nowhere to be seen. I couldn’t help but wonder what I had done wrong.

The last time I heard from him was over the phone in 2014. I tried to tell him about our parents and how much we all missed him. I asked him to be my brother again, but he cut me off, saying he was never my brother. After a pause, he admitted we could be friends. Making the toughest call of my life, I told him he was my brother—and if he ever remembers that, I’ll be there, ready for him to come back.

I’m now 32 years old. I often wonder how different our lives would have been if he had been diagnosed as a minor and received appropriate care. The laws in place do not help families in my situation.

My brother has no social media, and we suspect he traded his phone several years ago. My family has hired private investigators over the years, who have also worked with local police to try to track him down.

One private investigator’s report indicated an artist befriended my brother many years ago. When my mother tried contacting the artist, they said whatever happened between them was best left in the past and declined to respond. My mom had wanted to wish my brother a happy 30th birthday.

My brother grew up in a safe, middle-class home with two parents. He had no history of drug use or criminal record. He loved collecting vintage basketball cards, eating mint chocolate chip ice cream, and listening to Motown music. To my parents, there was no smoking gun indicating he needed help before it was too late.

The next time you think about a person screaming outside on the street, picture their families. We need policies and services that allow families to locate and support their loved ones living with mental illness, and stronger protections to ensure that individuals leaving facilities can transition into stable care. Current laws, including age-based consent rules, the limits of 72-hour holds, and the lack of step-down or supported housing options, leave too many families without resources when a serious diagnosis occurs.

Governments and lawmakers need to do better for people like my brother. As someone who thinks about him every day, I can tell you the burden is too heavy to carry alone.

James Finney-Conlon is a concerned brother and mental health advocate. He can be reached at [email protected].



Source link