Tesla is back to year-over-year growth, if you don’t look at EV sales


Tesla has reported its earnings for the first quarter of 2026. The automaker is reporting $22.4 billion in total revenue, a 16 percent year-over-year increase, and $0.41 earnings per share (non-GAAP).

Those beat market expectations of $22.3 billion in revenue, 14% growth, and $0.27 earnings per share. Tesla had one of its worst quarters in recent memory in Q1 2025, when it made $19.3 billion in revenue.

However, as the company previewed earlier in April, deliveries fell short of targets. The company moved a total of 358,023 cars in Q1 2026, or about 7,600 vehicles short of the expected volume. It also made more than 50,000 unsold EVs, suggesting the company might reduce production in Q2 (April to June) to clear inventory.

Tesla’s Q1 2026 revenue is up despite poor sales

A tariff refund and higher selling prices helped

Tesla partly credited the better-than-expected Q1 2026 results to “one-time benefits related to warranty and tariffs.” The company may have received a tariff refund in light of a court ruling overturning government policies. The firm also touted lower material costs and a tariff-related energy benefit.

However, the EV company also pointed to higher average selling prices as well as increases in Full Self-Driving purchases (1.28 million customers have bought or subscribed to the package). The gross profit margin climbed from 16.3 percent at the start of 2025 to 21.1 percent a year later. Shoppers are choosing more expensive configurations, even if there aren’t as many as Tesla hoped.

The subpar deliveries, meanwhile, might come from a rough overall EV market. Cox Automotive found that sales in the U.S. dropped 27 percent year-over-year in the first quarter as the end to the federal EV tax credit limited demand. Tesla took a relatively mild blow as its sheer size and the refreshed Model Y helped it gain market share, but it still faced an eight-point decline.

What’s next for Tesla in Q2 2026?

The company is still betting on AI and the Semi

Dynamic front 3/4 overhead shot of a red 2026 Tesla Model S Plaid. Credit: Tesla

In its outlook for Q2 2026, Tesla declined to shared numbers and instead provided general expectations. Deliveries would be affected by “aggregate demand” and the supply chain, the company said.

Tesla Cybertruck on display


Stop spending thousands on Cybertruck upgrades—these 5 Amazon finds cost $200 total

You could buy designer jeans that look like they were run over by a Cybertruck, or spend it on the actual truck itself.

It’s also still counting on an “acceleration” of profits from AI, fleet, and software sources. The company still expects to start Cybercab production this year, and is ending sales of the Model S and Model X to repurpose its Fremont factory for Optimus humanoid robots. Semi electric trucks and Megapack 3 energy storage are also going into volume production this year.


Will we learn more during the earnings call?

While Tesla’s Q1 2026 earnings call has not been completed as of this writing, we wouldn’t count on the company saying much more. It’s reportedly back to making a more affordable EV despite CEO Elon Musk downplaying it in 2024, but there’s been no official confirmation. The rumored car is still believed to be in the early stages and wouldn’t be ready in time to influence 2026 results.

Source: Tesla



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Vibe coding has taken the development world by storm—and it truly is a modern marvel to behold. The problem is, the vibe coding rush is going to leave a lot of apps broken in its wake once people move on to the next craze. At the end of the day, many of us are going to be left with apps that are broken with no fixes in sight.

A lot of vibe “coders” are really just prompt typers

And they’ve never touched a line of code

An AI robot using a computer with a prompt field on the screen. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

Vibe coding made development available to the masses like never before. You can simply take an AI tool, type a prompt into a text box, and out pops an app. It probably needs some refinement, but, typically, version one is still functional whenever you’re vibe coding.

The problem comes from “developers” who have never written a line of code. They’re just using vibe coding because it’s cool or they think they can make a quick buck, but they really have no knowledge of development—or any desire to learn proper development.

Think of those types of vibe coders as people who realize they can use a calculator and online tools to solve math problems for them, so they try to build a rocket. They might be able to make something work in some way, but they’ll never reach the moon, even though they think they can.

Anyone can vibe code a prototype

But you really need to know what you’re doing to build for the long haul

For those who don’t know what they’re doing, vibe coding is a fantastic way to build a prototype. I’ve vibe coded several projects so far, and out of everything I’ve done, I’ve realized one thing—vibe coding is only as good as the person behind the keyboard. I have spent more time debugging the fruits of my vibe coding than I have actually vibe coding.

Each project that I’ve built with vibe coding could have easily been “viable” within an hour or two, sometimes even less time than that. But, to make something of actual quality, it has always taken many, many hours.

Vibe coding is definitely faster than traditional coding if you’re a one-man team, but it’s not something that is fast by any means if you’re after a quality product. The same goes for continued updates.

I’ve spent the better part of three months building a weather app for iPhone. It’s a simple app, but it also has quite a lot of complex things going on in the background.

It recently got released in the App Store—no small feat at all. But, I still get a few crash reports a week, and I’m constantly squashing bugs and working on new features for the app. This is because I’m planning on supporting the app for a long time, not just the weekend I released it, and that takes a lot more work.

Vibe coders often jump from app to app without thinking of longevity

The app was a weekend project, after all

A relaxed man lounging on an orange beanbag watches as a friendly yellow robot works on a laptop for him, while multiple red exclamation-mark warning icons float around them. Credit: Lucas Gouveia/How-To Geek | ViDI Studio/Shutterstock

I’ve seen it far too often, a vibe coder touting that they built this “complex app” in 48 hours, as if that is something to be celebrated. Sure, it’s cool that a working version of an app was up and running in two days, but how well does it work? How many bugs are still in it? Are there race conditions that cause a random crash?

My weather app has a weird race condition right now I’m tracking down. It crashes, on occasion, when opened from Spotlight on an iPhone. Not every time does that cause a crash, just sometimes.

If a vibe coder’s only goal is to build apps in short amounts of time so they can brag about how fast they built the app, they likely aren’t going to take the time to fix little things like that.

I don’t vibe code my apps that way, and I know many other vibe coders that aren’t that way—but we all started with actual coding, not typing a prompt.


Anyone can be a vibe coder, but not all vibe coders are developers

“And when everyone’s super… no one will be.” – Syndrome, The Incredibles. It might be from a kids’ movie, but it rings true in the era of vibe coding. When everyone thinks they can build an app in a weekend, everyone thinks they’re a developer.

By contrast, not every vibe coder is actually a developer, and that’s the problem. It’s hard to know if the app you’re using was built by someone who has plans to support the app long-term or not—and that’s why there’s going to be a lot of broken apps in the future.

I can see it now, the apps that people built in a weekend as a challenge will simply go without updates. While the app might work for the first few weeks or months just fine, an API update comes along and breaks the app’s compatibility. It’s at that point we’ll see who was vibe coding to build an app versus who was vibe coding just for online clout—and the sad part is, consumers will lose out more often than not with broken apps.



Source link