System 7 transformed the Mac on May 13, 1991


When Apple released System 7 on May 13, 1991, it was the biggest change to the Mac since the start. While it came with some problems, it also brought us features we still use today, 35 years later.

It was a very different world in 1991. If you were a Mac owner, the release of System 7 was a thrill that had been years in the making. The New York Times even summed up the release by just saying that, “for Macintosh users, a very long wait is over.”

This is partly because System 7 didn’t make a giant impact outside of Mac users, though. To Windows users who even noticed, it was perhaps seen as more of a catch-up release than Apple would have liked. But if you had been working intensely with System 6, you wanted 7 badly.

And you may have got it badly, too. AppleInsider staff remember the 15 installation floppy disks and very well printed manuals arriving almost as well as we do the problems.

What was wrong with System 7

There were actual bugs, and it was a few months until an update was released to fix them. But the key issue was that you needed more RAM than you might have then had.

At the time, that would typically mean that you just couldn’t upgrade to a system that required more than you’d got. Except System 7 had a way of using hard disk space as virtual memory, so it allowed you to upgrade regardless of whether you had adequate actual RAM. It practically encouraged you.

“There are two basic reasons to upgrade to System 7,” said Chris Espinosa, Apple marketing manager, in a video promoting the system to businesses. “One is that you can make every Macintosh in your organization more powerful and easier to use.”

Espinosa did then go on to list what “every” Mac should have to make this work. Plus he showed how the upgrade included a compatibility checker that examined your Mac before installation.

Later on, macOS would thoroughly check your system and sideline incompatible apps, leaving them in an “Incompatible Software” or a “Relocated Items” folder. Back in 1991, the whole check was done via a HyperCard stack.

Really that meant that it was just a lookup table based on a list of compatible apps, as reported to Apple by software developers. Today you’d correctly be certain that there would be developers who wouldn’t get get around to reporting their work.

Yet in 1991, it all worked. Because in 1991, there were few apps for the Mac, compared to today.

It was such a different world in so many ways. If your Mac contained software that had not been updated to run under System 7, the HyperCard stack listed it, fine, but then also gave you developer’s phone number instead of their website.

Just as developers around 2020 had to adapt to Apple Silicon — and previously 64-bit apps, Intel and more — so they did have to make some changes to work under System 7. In comparison to whole platform changes, the work was simple, but it still took time for all developers to do it.

Whether people ignored the recommended RAM requirement of 2MB — not a misprint — or whether Apple was optimistic, there were people who installed that should not have done.

Remember that this was before SSDs, so when Apple said System 7 used your hard drive as virtual memory, it meant spinning discs. The result was Macs became very slow as System 7 read and wrote from those hard drives at length.

“And, second, you’ll be able to use the great new applications require System 7,” continued Espinosa. “And you don’t give up much because System 7 is compatible with the Macintosh computers, the networks, the applications and the documents that you use today.”

What was great about System 7

In our experience, it was hard to give up System 7 and downgrade back to System 6, and maybe chiefly because of MultiFinder. This was now built into the system and meant that, at last, you could run more than one app at a time.

True, it doesn’t sound riveting now. And there’s still an argument that you’re more productive if you stick to one app at a time. But in 1991, it was a relief and a blessing to have the option.

It was also a blessing how System 7 finally came with the feature that meant shutting down or restarting your Mac no longer automatically emptied the trash. That was a big deal.

Maybe Find was, too, when it first appeared in the File menu in System 7. But the vastly better Spotlight has erased that from our minds/

As changes go, though, the very smallest may have been the most surprising to Mac users of the time. System 7 introduced aliases, the way to effectively store one document in more than one place.

What you would do then and can still do now is select a document, an application, or a drive, and make an alias. That’s a very small file that when clicked, will open the original.

There was one reason not to —  unless you had a powerful enough Mac, System 7 would run slowly

There was one reason not to — unless you had a powerful enough Mac, System 7 would run slowly

You could copy that alias to a floppy drive and bring it to another Mac. As long as it was on the same AppleTalk network, clicking on the alias there was enough to open the original on this other Mac.

That was partly because System 7 also introduced Personal File Sharing.

And although we were all already used to double-clicking on documents to open them, System 7 gave us another tool. It was now possible to drag a document onto the icon for an application and open it.

That was only mildly convenient compared to double-clicking the document to open it, except when you wanted to use a different application. Now you could drag a Word document, say, to the now late and lamented WordPerfect for Mac and cross your fingers.

Speaking of word processors, it was in System 7 that we got TrueType fonts on the Mac.

And while it was less visible to most users, this is also the OS release that gave us Apple Events. You’ll know of Apple Events to this day if you ever write AppleScript to automate your Mac, although that has to be less likely since Shortcuts were introduced in 2014.

What didn’t last

All of these features continue in the Mac today, but there were some elements that got slowly forgotten over time. The most visible of these was Balloon Help.

Turn on Balloon Help and when you moved your cursor over a control or a window, you would get pop-up information about it. Eventually.

There was also Publish & Subscribe. This let you “publish,” say, part of your Excel spreadsheet. Then another user could “subscribe” to that and so when you changed the sheet, they saw the new data.

It was like Microsoft’s Object Linking and Embedding (OLE) of the time. And while it scored over OLE for having a name you could comprehend, the feature itself was complex and cumbersome enough that it fade away from lack of use.

Today we have the ability to send documents around and optionally collaborate on them. But Apple has put all of these features under the umbrella term of the Share menu.

Unimaginable in 1991 and still surprising in 2015 when it was done —  but this is System 7 running on an Apple Watch

Unimaginable in 1991 and still surprising in 2015 when it was done — but this is System 7 running on an Apple Watch

The excitement of System 7

The New York Times may have shrugged about it, but for a Mac user in 1991, System 7 was a huge deal. For the first time in some years, it felt as if you had a new Mac.

Of course, in some cases, you did. Because you had to.

But the feel of it was fresh and modern and it seemed as if Apple were doing something right. It was. System 7 became the longest-lasting of the classic Mac OS releases, being current up until System 7.6.1 in 1997.

Even then, there’s an argument that Apple only moved on to System 8 because it helped with the clone contracts that Steve Jobs wanted to get out of.

That’s not the best ending for an operating system, but overall System 7 is up there with the best of the Mac. And if we can’t exactly miss it, more than three decades on, we can still look back supremely fondly to the days of the Mac SE/30 and the like.

Fondly enough that there have been many projects to let present day users see System 7 on modern Macs. And just to illustrate how long 35 years is in technology, a developer got System 7 working on an Apple Watch.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Three-row family SUVs are expected to do everything; carry passengers comfortably, handle long road trips, keep running costs manageable, and remain dependable for years. Finding one that checks every box without becoming too expensive can be difficult, especially when fuel economy starts to matter as much as space. One hybrid Toyota stands out by delivering all of those priorities in a single package.

This three-row SUV combines the practicality families need with the efficiency advantages of hybrid power. It offers spacious seating, strong everyday comfort, and the kind of long-term reliability Toyota is known for, while using significantly less fuel than many traditional V-6 rivals in the same segment.

For buyers balancing family needs with ownership costs, that combination makes a major difference. It proves that a large SUV doesn’t have to be expensive to run or stressful to own, just thoughtfully engineered around what families actually need most.

In order to give you the most up-to-date and accurate information possible, the data used to compile this article was sourced from various manufacturer websites, including the EPA, CarEdge, and J.D. Power.

Mercedes-Benz 2027 C-Class Electric


Mercedes’ 2027 electric C-Class is its sportiest version yet—EV or not

You can also expect long range and ample in-cabin tech.

The 2026 Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid is affordable and built to last

Dependability is a big priority here

If you’re looking for a family SUV that is spacious, light on gas, and will last you a long time with few issues, then the Grand Highlander Hybrid feels like a no-brainer. It is slightly pricier than some of its direct rivals, but Toyota’s experience in developing hybrid means that you can rest peacefully knowing that this three-row SUV should last you years without any problem.

2026 Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid trims and pricing

Model

Starting MSRP

LE

$45,210

XLE

$46,380

Limited

$52,710

Nightshade Edition

$53,690

Platinum

$59,775

Compared to other hybrid three-row SUVs, the Grand Highlander is priced pretty well. While there are some more affordable options, like the Hyundai Palisade and Santa Fe, it undercuts rivals like the Kia Telluride and the Mazda CX-90. This middle of the pack pricing is about on-par for Toyota.

Of the above trims, we think that opting for the XLE gets you the best bang for your buck. It comes with all the features you’d want in a family hauler, such as a power-operated liftgate, a spattering of USB-C ports throughout the cabin, heated front seats, faux-leather upholstery, and a very comprehensive suite of driver aids.

Warranties, maintenance, and reliability

  • Reliability score: 82/100 (J.D. Power)
  • Limited warranty: 3 years or 36,000 miles
  • Powertrain warranty: 5 years or 60,000 miles
  • Complimentary maintenance: 2 years or 24,000 miles
  • Average ten-year maintenance costs: $6,299 (CarEdge)

Toyota offers a pretty standard warranty package to back up their reputation for reliability. While the Grand Highlander is technically a newer model, it is essentially just a long wheelbase version of the regular Highlander, meaning its mechanical components have proven themselves to be dependable.

Your first two years or scheduled maintenance visits are free with your purchase of a Grand Highlander. After that point, maintenance is reasonably affordable. CarEdge estimates that the average SUV would cost you $1,867 more to maintain over ten years than the Grand Highlander.

A silver Lexus GX 460 parked on a street alongside a sidewalk in a city.


Forget Mercedes—this Lexus SUV is the smarter luxury buy

Mercedes may lead luxury, but this Lexus SUV delivers the same upscale feel with way less ownership stress.

There is plenty of space in all three rows of the Grand Highlander Hybrid

Its cabin is simple but exceptionally practical

While the cabins of Toyota’s vehicles are usually a little pedestrian, there is something to be said about how versatile they are, as well as how easy they are to live with. The Grand Highlander definitely follows this trend. While it lacks the flair that some of its rivals offer, it delivers three rows of spacious seating, tons of modern tech, and loads of storage space.

Interior dimensions and comfort

Front row headroom

41.5 inches

Front row legroom

41.7 inches

Second row headroom

40.2 inches

Second row legroom

39.5 inches

Third row headroom

37.2 inches

Third row legroom

33.5 inches

Cargo capacity (behind third row)

20.6 cubic feet

The ‘Grand’ in Grand Highlander refers to the fact that it is quite a bit bigger than the traditional Highlander, with much more room on the inside. While the third row is still best suited for the kids, you could definitely fit a pair of adults back there at a push. We’re also really impressed with how much cargo space there is behind the third row.

The cabin layout of the Grand Highlander is very neat. Everything is easy to find and there are a ton of storage compartments scattered throughout. Its design won’t blow you away, but you’ll be pleased with just how intuitive all the controls are. The most affordable trims focus on the essentials, but top trims can come with some pretty plush features, including genuine leather upholstery, heated and ventilated front seats, and captain’s chairs in the second row.

Amazon Basics Trunk Organizer

Material

Oxford

Organizer Dimensions

21″L x 14.6″W x 10.3″H

Special Feature

Foldable

This 13.5-gallon trunk organizer features compartments to organize and store groceries, sports equipment, emergency supplies, and other daily essentials.


Infotainment and technology

Every Grand Highlander comes equipped with a 12.3-inch infotainment screen mounted to the top of the dashboard. Lower trim levels come with a hybrid gauge cluster that includes a seven-inch display in the middle, but from the Limited up you get a fully digital 12.3-inch unit instead.

As we already mentioned, there are a number of USB-C ports throughout the cabin, so that the whole family can charge their devices. A wireless charging pad is also included. Three-zone automatic climate control and wireless smartphone mirroring are standard on every trim level. Top trims also offer some better tech, including a heads-up display and an 11-speaker JBL sound system.

Hauling the family doesn’t have to mean spending a ton on gas

The Grand Highlander hybrid is impressively thrifty

Full view of a black 2025 Toyota Grand Highlander driving. Credit: Toyota

Toyota’s ideology of function over form definitely translates into how they tune the performance of their cars. The Grand Highlander Hybrid may not be the most interesting SUV from behind the wheel, but its fuel-sipping powertrain and plush ride means that it will save you money in the long run and keep the family happy.

Grand Highlander Hybrid performance and efficiency

Model

Hybrid

Hybrid MAX

Engine

2.5-liter naturally aspirated inline-four

2.4-liter turbocharged inline-four

Transmission

CVT

6-speed automatic

Horsepower

245 HP

362 HP

Torque

288 LB-FT

400 LB-FT

Driveline

FWD or AWD

AWD

0-60 MPH

7.8 seconds

5.6 seconds

The Grand Highlander Hybrid comes in two different forms. Most models feature a naturally aspirated inline-four under the hood. The Platinum comes exclusively with the Hybrid MAX setup, though, with the Limited offering a choice of either. The standard hybrid powertrain better suits the Grand Highlander in our mind, with the Hybrid MAX’s quick acceleration clashing with the SUV’s laid-back personality, especially because it takes it toll when it comes to efficiency.

As is the case with a lot of Toyota’s mainstream models, the Grand Highlander lacks excitement, even accounting for the Hybrid MAX’s quick acceleration. Steering is exceptionally light and vague, and the suspension is clearly set up for comfort. This isn’t a bad thing in our eyes, though, as the mission of the Japanese SUV is to get your family from A to B. This is where its comfortable ride quality really shines through.

Fuel economy

Model

City

Highway

Combined

Hybrid FWD

37 MPG

34 MPG

36 MPG

Hybrid AWD

36 MPG

32 MPG

34 MPG

Hybrid MAX AWD

26 MPG

27 MPG

27 MPG


There are few SUVs as well-suited to family life

Toyota skips the flash and the gimmicks that a lot of other brands have leaned into in the last couple of years. They focus instead on proven technology and long-term dependability. If you’re buying a family vehicle, that should be high up on your list of priorities. Any parent will tell you that they’d take simple functionality over anything, which is what makes the Grand Highlander Hybrid such a solid choice in this segment.



Source link